Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1972 Nov 30;136(6):1344–1355. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.6.1344

SPECIFIC ADHERENCE OF IN VITRO DIFFERENTIATED LYMPHOCYTES TO TARGET CELLS

Nurit Hollander 1, Haim Ginsburg 1
PMCID: PMC2139323  PMID: 4641852

Abstract

Blast cells which were derived from rat lymphocytes by stimulation with phytohemagglutinin (PHA), concanavalin A (Con A), or pokeweed mitogen (PWM) transformed within 2–3 days into a new type of lymphocytes when plated without mitogen on embryo fibroblast monolayers. These lymphocytes were termed secondary lyrophocytes. Upon addition of PWM to PWM-secondary lymphocytes a marked adherence to fibroblast monolayers was observed. The degree of adherence was estimated (a) by direct count of the lymphocytes in the medium and in the trypsinized fibroblast fraction, and (b) by using 51Cr-labeled lymphocytes. The adherence process required incubation at 37°C. The process started immediately after the addition of PWM and reached a plateau at 6 hr. At this time more than 80% of the lymphocytes adhered. In the absence of PWM only 12% of the lymphocytes were found in the fibroblast fraction. Unlike PWM-lymphocytes. Con A-lymphocytes, PHA-lymphocytes, and ordinary lymphocytes taken directly from the rat lymph nodes adhered only slightly more in the presence of PWM (10–20% adherence of ordinary lymphocytes) than in its absence (8% adherence). The adherence of the secondary lymphocytes and the ordinary lymphocytes was also studied in the presence of Con A and PHA. These mitogens induced high rate of adherence and they did not demonstrate specificity in their action. The adherence was accompanied by transformation of the lymphocytes to blast cells endowed with target-cell lytic ability. This transformation occurred mostly in the adhering fraction of the lymphocyte population. The results support the notion that target-cell recognition and destruction in cellular immunity involve contact between the cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (648.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BUNTING W. L., KIELY J. M., OWEN C. A., Jr Radiochromiumlabeled lymphocytes in the rat. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1963 Jun;113:370–374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bach F. H., Bock H., Graupner K., Day E., Klostermann H. Cell kinetic studies in mixed leukocyte cultures: an in vitro model of homograft reactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Feb;62(2):377–384. doi: 10.1073/pnas.62.2.377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berke G., Ax W., Ginsburg H., Feldman M. Graft reaction in tissue culture. II. Quantification of the lytic action on mouse fibroblasts by rat lymphocytes sensitized on mouse embryo monolayers. Immunology. 1969 May;16(5):643–657. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brondz B. D., Snegiröva A. E. Interaction of immune lymphocytes with the mixtures of target cells possessing selected specificities of the H-2 immunizing allele. Immunology. 1971 Apr;20(4):457–468. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ginsburg H. Graft versus host reaction in tissue culture. I. Lysis of monolayers of embryo mouse cells from strains differing in the H-2 histocompatibility locus by rat lymphocytes sensitized in vitro. Immunology. 1968 May;14(5):621–635. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ginsburg H., Hollander N., Feldman M. The development of hypersensitive lymphocytes in cell culture. J Exp Med. 1971 Oct 1;134(4):1062–1082. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.4.1062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ginsburg H. Lysis of target cell monolayers by lymphocytes stimulated with pokeweed mitogen. Transplantation. 1971 Apr;11(4):408–412. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197104000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ginsburg H., Sachs L. Destruction of mouse and rat embryo cells in tissue culture by lymph node cells from unsensitized rats. J Cell Physiol. 1965 Oct;66(2):199–219. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030660207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ginsburg H. The function of the delayed sensitivity reaction as revealed in the graft reaction culture. Adv Cancer Res. 1970;13:63–95. doi: 10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60164-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Golstein P., Erik M. D., Svedmyr A. J., Wigzell H. Cells mediating specific in vitro cytotoxicity. I. Detection of receptor-bearing lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1971 Dec 1;134(6):1385–1402. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.6.1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. KOPROWSKI H., FERNANDES M. V. Autosensitization reaction in vitro. Contactual agglutination of sensitized lymph node cells in brain tissue culture accompanied by destruction of glial elements. J Exp Med. 1962 Oct 1;116:467–476. doi: 10.1084/jem.116.4.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lonai P., Wekerle H., Feldman M. Fractionation of specific antigen-reactive cells in an in vitro system of cell-mediated immunity. Nat New Biol. 1972 Feb 23;235(60):235–236. doi: 10.1038/newbio235235a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McFarland W., Heilman D. H., Moorhead J. F. Functional anatomy of the lymphocyte in immunological reactions in vitro. J Exp Med. 1966 Nov 1;124(5):851–858. doi: 10.1084/jem.124.5.851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. ROSENAU W., MOON H. D. Lysis of homologous cells by sensitized lymphocytes in tissue culture. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1961 Aug;27:471–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wilson D. B., Blyth JL NOWELL P. C. Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. 3. Kinetics of the response. J Exp Med. 1968 Nov 1;128(5):1157–1181. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.5.1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilson D. B. QUANTITATIVE STUDIES ON THE BEHAVIOR OF SENSITIZED LYMPHOCYTES IN VITRO : I. RELATIONSHIP OF THE DEGREE OF DESTRUCTION OF HOMOLOGOUS TARGET CELLS TO THE NUMBER OF LYMPHOCYTES AND TO THE TIME OF CONTACT IN CULTURE AND CONSIDERATION OF THE EFFECTS OF ISOIMMUNE SERUM. J Exp Med. 1965 Jul 1;122(1):143–166. doi: 10.1084/jem.122.1.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES