Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1973 Jun 1;137(6):1526–1531. doi: 10.1084/jem.137.6.1526

PRODUCTION OF A RABBIT ANTIMOUSE EOSINOPHIL SERUM WITH NO CROSS-REACTIVITY TO NEUTROPHILS

Adel A F Mahmoud 1, Kenneth S Warren 1, Dov L Boros 1
PMCID: PMC2139341  PMID: 4709271

Abstract

Antieosinophil serum (AES), obtained by immunizing rabbits with a highly purified suspension of mouse eosinophils, contains high titers of specific agglutinating and cytotoxic antibodies to eosinophils. Absorption with macrophages, lymphocytes, and neutrophils does not affect the antieosinophilic activity while it is markedly lowered by absorption with eosinophils. One dose of AES (0.1 ml) injected into mice with schistosomiasis mansoni caused a mean decrease in circulating eosinophils of 90% within 1 h which was maintained for 5 days, followed by gradual recovery. No other changes in the total or differential white cell counts were noted. In normal mice AES markedly depressed exudation of eosinophils in the peritoneal cavity after repeated saline stimulation. Some of the immunological and clinical implications of a monospecific AES are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (315.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ARCHER G. T., BOSWORTH N. Phagocytosis by eosinophils following antigen-antibody reactions in vitro. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1961 Apr;39:157–163. doi: 10.1038/icb.1961.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ARCHER G. T., HIRSCH J. G. ISOLATION OF GRANULES FROM EOSINOPHIL LEUCOCYTES AND STUDY OF THEIR ENZYME CONTENT. J Exp Med. 1963 Aug 1;118:277–286. doi: 10.1084/jem.118.2.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Basten A., Beeson P. B. Mechanism of eosinophilia. II. Role of the lymphocyte. J Exp Med. 1970 Jun 1;131(6):1288–1305. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.6.1288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boros D. L., Warren K. S. Effect of antimacrophage serum on hypersensitivity (Schistosoma mansoni egg) and foreign body (divinyl-benzene copolymer bead) granulomas. J Immunol. 1971 Aug;107(2):534–539. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boros D. L., Warren K. S. The bentonite granuloma. Characterization of a model system for infectious and foreign body granulomatous inflammation using soluble mycobacterial, histoplasma and schistosoma antigens. Immunology. 1973 Mar;24(3):511–529. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cochrane C. G. Immunologic tissue injury mediated by neutrophilic leukocytes. Adv Immunol. 1968;9:97–162. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60442-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Day R. P. Eosinophil cell separation from human peripheral blood. Immunology. 1970 Jun;18(6):955–959. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fliedner T. M., Fache I., Adolphi C. Uber die Umsatzkinetik der Leukocyten bei keimfreien Mäusen. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1966 Sep 17;96(37):1236–1238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lawrence J. S., Craddock C. G., Jr, Campbell T. N. Antineutrophilic serum, its use in studies of white blood cell dynamics. J Lab Clin Med. 1967 Jan;69(1):88–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Parish W. E., Coombs R. R. Peripheral blood eosinophilia in guinea-pigs following implantation of anaphylactic guinea-pig and human lung. Br J Haematol. 1968 Apr;14(4):425–445. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1968.tb06994.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pierce L. E., Hosseinian A. H., Constantine A. B. Disseminated eosinophilic collagen disease. Blood. 1967 Apr;29(4):540–549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. SAMTER M. The response of eosinophils in the guinea pig to sensitization, anaphylaxis and various drugs. Blood. 1949 Mar;4(3):217–246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Simpson D. M., Ross R. Effects of heterologous antineutrophil serum in guinea pigs. Hematologic and ultrastructural observations. Am J Pathol. 1971 Oct;65(1):79–102. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Warren K. S., Domingo E. O., Cowan R. B. Granuloma formation around schistosome eggs as a manifestation of delayed hypersensitivity. Am J Pathol. 1967 Nov;51(5):735–756. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES