Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1973 Jan 1;137(1):69–84. doi: 10.1084/jem.137.1.69

DIRECT DEMONSTRATION OF THETA-POSITIVE ANTIGEN-BINDING CELLS, WITH ANTIGEN-INDUCED MOVEMENT OF THYMUS-DEPENDENT CELL RECEPTORS

Robert F Ashman 1, Martin C Raff 1
PMCID: PMC2139368  PMID: 4569470

Abstract

Anti-θAKR antibody conjugated to fluorescein has been used in direct immunofluorescence tests to identify spleen θ+ (T) sheep erythrocyte rosette-forming cells in AKR mice. Specificity studies involving A and cogenic A/θAKR mice clearly demonstrated that the cell surface fluorescence and cytotoxicity produced by the antiserum is directed solely toward the θAKR alloantigen. Approximately ⅜ of rosette-forming and non-rosette-forming spleen cells were found to be θ+. The tendency for T cells to bind less antigen and the tendency for antigen-binding T cells to bear less θ than other spleen T cells, first suggested by other studies involving rosette-elimination by anti-θC3H plus complement, were confirmed by direct immunofluorescence. All AKR rosettes are specifically inhibitable by anti-immunoglobulin, including T rosettes. Antigen-induced redistribution of T cell receptors, analogous to that previously described for B cell receptors (16), occurs as readily in θ+RFC as in θ- RFC, without altering the symmetrical ring distribution of θAKR antigen.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (820.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aoki T., Hämmerling U., De Harven E., Boyse E. A., Old L. J. Antigenic structure of cell surfaces. An immunoferritin study of the occurrence and topography of H-2' theta, and TL alloantigens on mouse cells. J Exp Med. 1969 Nov 1;130(5):979–1001. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.5.979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bach J. F., Muller J. Y., Dardenne M. In vivo specific antigen recognition by rosette forming cells. Nature. 1970 Sep 19;227(5264):1251–1252. doi: 10.1038/2271251a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baird S., Santa J., Weissman I. Anti-theta antisera may contain anti-allotype contamination. Nat New Biol. 1971 Jul 14;232(28):56–56. doi: 10.1038/newbio232056a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bankhurst A. D., Wilson J. D. Detection of antigen-binding cells by combined rosette formation and autoradiography. Nat New Biol. 1971 Dec 1;234(48):154–156. doi: 10.1038/newbio234154b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Basten A., Miller J. F., Warner N. L., Pye J. Specific inactivation of thymus-derived (T) and non-thymus-derived (B) lymphocytes by 125I-labelled antigen. Nat New Biol. 1971 May 26;231(21):104–106. doi: 10.1038/newbio231104a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boyse E. A., Itakura K., Stockert E., Iritani C. A., Miura M. Ly-C: a third locus specifying alloantigens expressed only on thymocytes and lymphocytes. Transplantation. 1971 Mar;11(3):351–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boyse E. A., Miyazawa M., Aoki T., Old L. J. Ly-A and Ly-B: two systems of lymphocyte isoantigens in the mouse. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1968 Jun 11;170(1019):175–193. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1968.0032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davie J. M., Rosenthal A. S., Paul W. E. Receptors on immunocompetent cells. 3. Specificity and nature of receptors on dinitrophenylated guinea pig albumin- 125 I-binding cells of immunized guinea pigs. J Exp Med. 1971 Aug 1;134(2):517–531. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.2.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis W. C. H-2 antigen on cell membranes: an explanation for the alteration of distribution by indirect labeling techniques. Science. 1972 Mar 3;175(4025):1006–1008. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4025.1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Greaves M. F., Möller E. Studies on antigen-binding cells. I. The origin of reactive cells. Cell Immunol. 1970 Oct;1(4):372–385. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(70)90015-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hogg N. M., Greaves M. F. Antigen-binding thymus-derived lymphocytes. I. Rapid method for isolation of theta-positive antigen-stimulated cells. Immunology. 1972 Jun;22(6):959–965. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hogg N. M., Greaves M. F. Antigen-binding thymus-derived lymphocytes. II. Nature of the immunoglobulin determinants. Immunology. 1972 Jun;22(6):967–980. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Loor F., Forni L., Pernis B. The dynamic state of the lymphocyte membrane. Factors affecting the distribution and turnover of surface immunoglobulins. Eur J Immunol. 1972 Jun;2(3):203–212. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830020304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McConnell I., Munro A., Gurner B. W., Coombs R. R. Studies on actively allergized cells. I. The cyto-dynamics and morphology of rosete-forming lymph node cells in mice and inhibition of rosette-formation with antibody to mouse immunoglobulins. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1969;35(3):209–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Modabber F., Morikawa S., Coons A. H. Antigen-binding cells in normal mouse thymus. Science. 1970 Dec 4;170(3962):1102–1104. doi: 10.1126/science.170.3962.1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Porath J., Axen R., Ernback S. Chemical coupling of proteins to agarose. Nature. 1967 Sep 30;215(5109):1491–1492. doi: 10.1038/2151491a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Raff M. C. Naturally-occurring autoantibodies to mouse thymocytes. Isr J Med Sci. 1971 Jun;7(6):724–726. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Raff M. C., Sternberg M., Taylor R. B. Immunoglobulin determinants on the surface of mouse lymphoid cells. Nature. 1970 Feb 7;225(5232):553–554. doi: 10.1038/225553a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Raff M. C. Two distinct populations of peripheral lymphocytes in mice distinguishable by immunofluorescence. Immunology. 1970 Oct;19(4):637–650. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Raff M. C., Wortis H. H. Thymus dependence of theta-bearing cells in the peripheral lymphoid tissues of mice. Immunology. 1970 Jun;18(6):931–942. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Reif A. E., Allen J. M. Mouse thymic iso-antigens. Nature. 1966 Jan 29;209(5022):521–523. doi: 10.1038/209521b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schlesinger M. Anti-theta antibodies for detecting thymus-dependent lymphocytes in the immune response of mice to SRBC. Nature. 1970 Jun 27;226(5252):1254–1256. doi: 10.1038/2261254a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schlesinger M., Yron I. Antigenic changes in lymph-node cells after administration of antiserum to thymus cells. Science. 1969 Jun 20;164(3886):1412–1413. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3886.1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schlossman S. F. Antigen recognition: the specificity of T cells involved in the cellular immune response. Transplant Rev. 1972;10:97–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1972.tb01540.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shirai T., Mellors R. C. Natural thymocytotoxic autoantibody and reactive antigen in New Zealand black and other mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Jul;68(7):1412–1415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.7.1412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES