Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1973 Feb 28;137(3):721–739. doi: 10.1084/jem.137.3.721

REGULATION OF THE IMMUNE RESPONSE

II. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THYMUS- AND BONE MARROW-DERIVED LYMPHOCYTES IN THE RECOGNITION OF ANTIGEN

Michael Hoffmann 1, John W Kappler 1
PMCID: PMC2139373  PMID: 4120287

Abstract

The specificity of antigen recognition by thymus-derived helper cells (T cells) and antibody was examined in mice, heterologous erythrocyte antigens from sheep (SRBC), goat (GRBC), burro (BRBC), chicken (CRBC), and toad (TRBC) being used. Antibody specificity was tested by a number of functional assays: hemagglutination, hemolysis, and immune suppression. The specificity of T cells was determined by titrating their ability to help the in vitro antitrinitrophenol (TNP) responses of mouse spleen cultures immunized with the hapten coupled to the various test erythrocytes as carrier. Anti-SRBC antibody cross-reacted with GRBC, but not with BRBC, CRBC, or TRBC. In contrast, SRBC-primed helper T cells cross-reacted with both GRBC and BRBC, but not with CRBC or TRBC, indicating a difference in the specificity of antigen recognition between the cellular and the humoral immune responses.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ada G. L., Byrt P. Specific inactivation of antigen-reactive cells with 125I-labelled antigen. Nature. 1969 Jun 28;222(5200):1291–1292. doi: 10.1038/2221291a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Basten A., Miller J. F., Warner N. L., Pye J. Specific inactivation of thymus-derived (T) and non-thymus-derived (B) lymphocytes by 125I-labelled antigen. Nat New Biol. 1971 May 26;231(21):104–106. doi: 10.1038/newbio231104a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooper M. G. Delayed-type hypersensitivity in the mouse. II. Transfer by thymus-derived (T) cells. Scand J Immunol. 1972;1(3):237–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1972.tb01815.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cunningham A. J., Sercarz E. E. The asynchronous development of immunological memory in helper (T) and precursor (B) cell lines. Eur J Immunol. 1971 Dec;1(6):413–421. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830010602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dutton R. W., Mishell R. I. Cell populations and cell proliferation in the in vitro response of normal mouse spleen to heterologous erythrocytes. Analysis by the hot pulse technique. J Exp Med. 1967 Sep 1;126(3):443–454. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.3.443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Falkoff R., Kettman J. Differential stimulation of precursor cells and carrier-specific thymus-derived cell activity in the in vivo reponse to heterologous erythrocytes in mice. J Immunol. 1972 Jan;108(1):54–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Greaves M. F., Möller E., Möller G. Studies on antigen-binding cells. II. Relationship to antigen-sensitive cells. Cell Immunol. 1970 Oct;1(4):386–403. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(70)90016-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Greaves M. F., Möller E. Studies on antigen-binding cells. I. The origin of reactive cells. Cell Immunol. 1970 Oct;1(4):372–385. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(70)90015-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Haritou H., Argyris B. F. Evidence for cross-reactivity of antigens at the level of thymus-derived cells. Cell Immunol. 1972 Jun;4(2):179–181. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(72)90017-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Henry C., Kimura J., Wofsy L. Cell separation on affinity columns: the isolation of immunospecific precursor cells from unimmunized mice (lactoside hapten-lymphocyte receptors-immunology). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Jan;69(1):34–36. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.1.34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hoffmann M., Kappler J. W. The antigen specificity of thymus-derived helper cells. J Immunol. 1972 Jan;108(1):261–263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hämmerling U., Rajewsky K. Evidence for surface-associated immunoglobulin on T and B lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1971 Dec;1(6):447–452. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830010608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kettman J. Delayed hypersensitivity: is the same population of thymus-derived cells responsible for cellular immunity reactions and the carrier effect? Immunol Commun. 1972;1(3):289–299. doi: 10.3109/08820137209022942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kettman J., Dutton R. W. An in vitro primary immune response to 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl substituted erythrocytes: response against carrier and hapten. J Immunol. 1970 Jun;104(6):1558–1561. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kettman J., Dutton R. W. Radioresistance of the enhancing effect of cells from carrier-immunized mice in an in vitro primary immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Apr;68(4):699–703. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.4.699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lennon V. A., Wilks A. V., Carnegie P. R. Immunologic properties of the main encephalitogenic peptide from the basic protein of human myelin. J Immunol. 1970 Nov;105(5):1223–1230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lesley J. F., Kettman J. R., Dutton R. W. Immunoglobulins on the surface of thymus-derived cells engaged in the initiation of a humoral immune response. J Exp Med. 1971 Sep 1;134(3 Pt 1):618–629. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.3.618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Marchalonis J. J., Atwell J. L., Cone R. E. Isolation of surface immunoglobulin from lymphocytes from human and murine thymus. Nat New Biol. 1972 Feb 23;235(60):240–242. doi: 10.1038/newbio235240a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Marchalonis J. J., Cone R. E., Atwell J. L. Isolation and partial characterization of lymphocyte surface immunoglobulins. J Exp Med. 1972 Apr 1;135(4):956–971. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.4.956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mason S., Warner N. L. The immunoglobulin nature of the antigen recognition site on cells mediating transplantation immunity and delayed hypersentivity. J Immunol. 1970 Mar;104(3):762–765. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McDevitt H. O., Benacerraf B. Genetic control of specific immune responses. Adv Immunol. 1969;11:31–74. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60477-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mishell R. I., Dutton R. W. Immunization of dissociated spleen cell cultures from normal mice. J Exp Med. 1967 Sep 1;126(3):423–442. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.3.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nossal G. J., Warner N. L., Lewis H., Sprent J. Quantitative features of a sandwich radioimmunolabeling technique for lymphocyte surface receptors. J Exp Med. 1972 Feb 1;135(2):405–428. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.2.405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Parish C. R. Immune response to chemically modified flagellin. II. Evidence for a fundamental relationship between humoral and cell-mediated immunity. J Exp Med. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):21–47. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Paul W. E., Katz D. H., Goidl E. A., Benacerraf B. Carrier function in anti-hapten immune responses. II. Specific properties of carrier cells capable of enhancing anti-hapten antibody responses. J Exp Med. 1970 Aug 1;132(2):283–299. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.2.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pernis B., Forni L., Amante L. Immunoglobulins as cell receptors. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1971 Dec 31;190:420–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1971.tb13552.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Playfair J. H. Response of mouse T and B lymphocytes to sheep erythrocytes. Nat New Biol. 1972 Jan 26;235(56):115–118. doi: 10.1038/newbio235115a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Radovich J., Talmage D. W. Antigenic competition: cellular or humoral. Science. 1967 Oct 27;158(3800):512–514. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3800.512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Raff M. C. Two distinct populations of peripheral lymphocytes in mice distinguishable by immunofluorescence. Immunology. 1970 Oct;19(4):637–650. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rittenberg M. B., Pratt K. L. Antitrinitrophenyl (TNP) plaque assay. Primary response of Balb/c mice to soluble and particulate immunogen. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1969 Nov;132(2):575–581. doi: 10.3181/00379727-132-34264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. SALVIN S. B., SMITH R. F. Delayed hypersensitivity and the anamnestic response. J Immunol. 1960 May;84:449–457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Senyk G., Nitecki D., Goodman J. W. Immunogenicity of glucagon: determinants responsible for antibody binding and lymphocyte stimulation. Science. 1971 Jan 29;171(3969):407–408. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3969.407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Takahashi T., Old L. J., McIntire K. R., Boyse E. A. Immunoglobulin and other surface antigens of cells of the immune system. J Exp Med. 1971 Oct 1;134(4):815–832. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.4.815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Unanue E. R., Grey H. M., Rabellino E., Campbell P., Schmidtke J. Immunoglobulins on the surface of lymphocytes. II. The bone marrow as the main source of lymphocytes with detectable surface-bound immunoglobulin. J Exp Med. 1971 Jun 1;133(6):1188–1198. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.6.1188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Vitetta E. S., Baur S., Uhr J. W. Cell surface immunoglobulin. II. Isolation and characterization of immunoglobulin from mouse splenic lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):242–264. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vitetta E. S., Bianco C., Nussenzweig V., Uhr J. W. Cell surface immunoglobulin. IV. Distribution among thymocytes, bone mrrow cells, and their derived populations. J Exp Med. 1972 Jul 1;136(1):81–93. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES