Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1973 Feb 28;137(3):590–602. doi: 10.1084/jem.137.3.590

CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY AND BLOCKING SERUM ACTIVITY TO TOLERATED ALLOGRAFTS IN RATS

S C Bansal 1, K E Hellström 1, I Hellström 1, H O Sjögren 1
PMCID: PMC2139386  PMID: 4570016

Abstract

W/Fu rats were neonatally inoculated with bone marrow cells from B/N rats and vice versa. Of the inoculated rats, some were capable of accepting a foreign (B/N or W/Fu) skin graft over the period of observation (i.e. for more than 100 days), while other rats rejected their skin grafts as early as control animals (within 8–12 days) or after a prolonged period of acceptance (20–96 days). Using a microcytotoxicity test, it could be shown that both those rats that rapidly rejected skin grafts and those that kept their grafts during the observation period had lymphocytes capable of destroying cultivated allogeneic cells from the respective strains with whose cells the rats had been inoculated as newborns. The degree of lymphocyte reactivity decreased upon time, so that 4 of 13 rats that had carried "tolerated" skin grafts over more than 84 days had lymphocytes which were nonreactive in the highest dose tested, and the degree of reactivity in the other 9 rats was less than seen early after tolerance induction. Rats that were capable of accepting skin grafts over prolonged periods of time had sera that could specifically block lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity, while sera from rats that had rejected their grafts did not block. Sera from rats that rejected their skin grafts after 20–96 days lost the blocking activity 3–10 days before rejection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (862.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BILLINGHAM R. E., BRENT L., MEDAWAR P. B. Actively acquired tolerance of foreign cells. Nature. 1953 Oct 3;172(4379):603–606. doi: 10.1038/172603a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brent L., Brooks C., Lubling N., Thomas A. V. Attempts to demonstrate an in vivo role for serum blocking factors in tolerant mice. Transplantation. 1972 Sep;14(3):382–387. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197209000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jose D. G., Kersey J. H., Choi Y. S., Biggar W. D., Gatti R. A., Good R. A. Humoral antagonism of cellular immunity in children with immune-deficiency disease reconstituted by bone-marrow transplantation. Lancet. 1971 Oct 16;2(7729):841–844. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(71)90220-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mitchison N. A. Perspectives of immunological tolerance in transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1971 Mar;3(1):953–959. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pertoft H., Bäck O., Lindahl-Kiessling K. Separation of various blood cells in colloidal silica-polyvinylpyrrolidone gradients. Exp Cell Res. 1968 May;50(2):355–368. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(68)90454-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Phillips S. M., Martin W. J., Shaw A. R., Wegmann T. G. Serum-mediated immunological non-reactivity between histoincompatible cells in tetraparental mice. Nature. 1971 Nov 19;234(5325):146–148. doi: 10.1038/234146a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pierce G. E., Quadracci L. J., Tremann J. A., Moe R. E., Striker G. E., Hellstrom I., Hellstrom K. E., Marchioro T. L. Studies on cellular and humoral immune factors in human renal transplantation. Ann Surg. 1971 Oct;174(4):609–619. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197110000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schwarz M. R. The mixed lymphocyte reaction: an in vitro test for tolerance. J Exp Med. 1968 May 1;127(5):879–890. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.5.879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Voisin G. A., Kinsky R. G., Duc H. T. Immune status of mice tolerant of living cells. II. Continuous presence and nature of facilitation-enhancing antibodies in tolerant animals. J Exp Med. 1972 May 1;135(5):1185–1203. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.5.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wegmann T. G., Hellström I., Hellström K. E. Immunological tolerance: "forbidden clones" allowed in tetraparental mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Jul;68(7):1644–1647. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.7.1644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wilson D. B., Billingham R. E. Lymphocytes and transplantation immunity. Adv Immunol. 1967;7:189–273. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60129-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wilson D. B., Silvers W. K., Nowell P. C. Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. II. Relationship of the proliferative response to the immunologic status of the donors. J Exp Med. 1967 Oct 1;126(4):655–665. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.4.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wood M. L., Gozzo J. J., Heppner G., Monaco A. P. Cell-mediated immunity and serum blocking factor in tolerance produced in mice with antilymphocyte serum and bone marrow cell infusion. Transplant Proc. 1972 Sep;4(3):383–389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES