Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1998 Aug 4;95(16):9654–9659. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9654

Human endplate acetylcholinesterase deficiency caused by mutations in the collagen-like tail subunit (ColQ) of the asymmetric enzyme

Kinji Ohno 1, Joan Brengman 1, Akira Tsujino 1, Andrew G Engel 1,*
PMCID: PMC21394  PMID: 9689136

Abstract

In skeletal muscle, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) exists in homomeric globular forms of type T catalytic subunits (ACHET) and heteromeric asymmetric forms composed of 1, 2, or 3 tetrameric ACHET attached to a collagenic tail (ColQ). Asymmetric AChE is concentrated at the endplate (EP), where its collagenic tail anchors it into the basal lamina. The ACHET gene has been cloned in humans; COLQ cDNA has been cloned in Torpedo and rodents but not in humans. In a disabling congenital myasthenic syndrome, EP AChE deficiency (EAD), the normal asymmetric species of AChE are absent from muscle. EAD could stem from a defect that prevents binding of ColQ to ACHET or the insertion of ColQ into the basal lamina. In six EAD patients, we found no mutations in ACHET. We therefore cloned human COLQ cDNA, determined the genomic structure and chromosomal localization of COLQ, and then searched for mutations in this gene. We identified six recessive truncation mutations of COLQ in six patients. Coexpression of each COLQ mutant with wild-type ACHET in SV40-transformed monkey kidney fibroblast (COS) cells reveals that a mutation proximal to the ColQ attachment domain for ACHET prevents association of ColQ with ACHET; mutations distal to the attachment domain generate a mutant ≈10.5S species of AChE composed of one ACHET tetramer and a truncated ColQ strand. The ≈10.5S species lack part of the collagen domain and the entire C-terminal domain of ColQ, or they lack only the C-terminal domain, which is required for formation of the triple collagen helix, and this likely prevents their insertion into the basal lamina.


Acetylcholinesterase (AChE; enzyme classification 3.1.1.7) is the enzyme responsible for rapid hydrolysis of acetylcholine released at cholinergic synapses. At the normal endplate (EP), AChE limits the number of collisions between acetylcholine and the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) and, hence, the duration of the synaptic response (1). Inhibition of the enzyme results in prolonged exposure of AChR to acetylcholine, causing desensitization of AChR (2), a depolarization block at physiologic rates of stimulation (3), and an EP myopathy caused by cationic overloading of the postsynaptic region (4, 5).

Two classes of AChE are present in mammalian skeletal muscle (6, 7): (i) homomeric or globular forms that consist of monomers (G1), dimers (G2), or tetramers (G4) of the T isoform of the catalytic subunit (ACHET), and (ii) heteromeric forms that consist of ACHET subunits linked to a triple helical collagen-like tail subunit (asymmetric forms) or to hydrophobic subunits. The function of the collagen-like tail is to anchor catalytic subunits to the basal lamina. The tail is formed by the triple helical association of three collagen-like strands, ColQ. The proline-rich attachment domain (PRAD) of each strand can bind an ACHET tetramer producing the asymmetric A4, A8, and A12 moieties (8). Asymmetric AChE is concentrated at the EP where it is the predominant species of AChE (9, 10).

In humans, all molecular forms of the catalytic subunit are encoded by one AChE gene (6, 11, 12). In muscle fibers, exons 2–4 (which encode the catalytic domain) spliced to exon 6 encode ACHET. COLQ cDNA has been cloned and sequenced from Torpedo electric organ (13) and rat muscle (14), and the partial genomic sequence of mouse COLQ has been determined (14). The sequence of the human COLQ gene has not been reported to date.

In 1977, Engel et al. (15) reported a patient with a severely disabling congenital myasthenic syndrome associated with EP AChE deficiency (EAD). Other patients with similar disorders were observed subsequently (16, 17). In these patients, AChE is absent from the EP by enzyme cytochemical and immunocytochemical criteria, and electron cytochemical studies reveal no reaction product for the enzyme in the synaptic basal lamina. Owing to absence of the enzyme from the EP, synaptic currents are prolonged and evoke repetitive muscle fiber action potentials. The presynaptic terminals are abnormally small and often are encased by Schwann cells, reducing the number of quanta released by nerve impulse, perhaps to protect the postsynaptic region from desensitization and cationic overloading. Despite reduced quantal release, at some EPs, the junctional folds degenerate, causing loss of AChR, and the junctional sarcoplasm contains apoptotic nuclei and degenerating membranous organelles. Density gradients ultracentrifugation of muscle extracts of four patients with EAD revealed no asymmetric AChE found in normal muscle, but a fifth patient who also had no AChE deposits at the EP had detectable extracted asymmetric AChE. In these patients, the kinetic properties of residual AChE in muscle as well as the activity and kinetic properties of erythrocyte AChE were normal. Mutation analysis of ACHET in two EAD patients not included in this report revealed no abnormality, and SV40-transformed monkey kidney fibroblast (COS) cells cotransfected with ACHET cloned from these two patients together with Torpedo COLQ readily expressed asymmetric AChE (18).

Taken together, the above findings suggest that EAD in humans who do not express asymmetric AChE stems from a defect that prevents binding of ColQ to ACHET or the insertion of ColQ into the basal lamina. Here, we report cloning of human COLQ cDNA, determination of the genomic structure and chromosomal localization of the gene, and identification of six truncation mutations of COLQ in six patients with EAD. Coexpression of each COLQ mutant with wild-type ACHET in COS cells indicates that the mutant peptide either fails to assemble with AChET or binds one tetramer of AChET but is unlikely to insert into the basal lamina.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients.

Six patients with EAD, presently 12, 37, 7, 14, 8, and 2 years of age, were studied. Four were male, and two were female. Clinical and EP findings in patients 2 (15) and 3 (case 4 in Refs. 16 and 17) were reported. All had severe myasthenic symptoms since birth, negative tests for anti-AChR antibodies, a decremental electromyographic response, and failed to respond to anticholinesterase medications. Except in patient 2, supramaximal nerve stimuli evoked a repetitive compound muscle fiber action potential. Patient 6 had two siblings who died in early childhood of myasthenic symptoms; the other patients have no similarly affected relatives. Studies of intercostal muscle specimens in each patient showed absence of EP AChE, prolonged EP currents unaffected by cholinesterase inhibitors, reduced quantal release by nerve impulse, and small presynaptic endings often covered by Schwann cells. AChR channel kinetics, investigated in patients 4, 5, and 6, were normal.

Tissue Specimens.

Intercostal muscle specimens were obtained from patients, and control subjects without muscle disease undergoing thoracic surgery. All human studies were in accord with the guidelines of the Institutional Review Board of the Mayo Clinic. mRNA was isolated from muscle, and DNA was isolated from muscle and blood as described (19).

Sequencing Procedures.

PCR-amplified fragments were purified by the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). Plasmids were purified by the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen) and were precipitated with ethanol. PCR products and plasmids were sequenced with an ABI 377 DNA sequencer (Perkin–Elmer) by using fluorescently labeled dideoxy terminators. PCR primers and conditions used in this study are available on request.

cDNA Cloning of Human COLQ.

We used nested touchdown reverse transcription (RT)-PCR (20) to amplify and directly sequence a human COLQ cDNA fragment by using mouse COLQ primers located in PRAD and the collagen domain (14). After identifying a 76-bp fragment of human COLQ by homology PCR, we extended the COLQ sequence in the 5′ and 3′ directions by rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) by using a human adult skeletal muscle cDNA library (Marathon-Ready cDNA, CLONTECH). Sequencing of the cloned RACE products revealed 3 positive 5′-RACE clones out of 11 and 4 positive 3′-RACE clones out of 14.

Analysis of Genomic Structure of COLQ.

To determine the genomic structure of the human COLQ gene, we synthesized 38 cDNA primers and amplified and directly sequenced overlapping segments of genomic DNA by long-distance PCR. Nested inverse PCR was used to amplify untranslated regions flanking exons 1 and 1A. Control genomic DNA was digested with BamHI, EcoRI, HhaI, HindIII, PstI, or Sau3AI, was self-ligated, was amplified by inverse PCR, and was directly sequenced.

Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH).

To determine the chromosomal localization of COLQ, we labeled the human COLQ cDNA spanning nucleotides −92 to 1,471 with digoxigenin-dUTP (Boehringer Mannheim) by the BioNick DNA Labeling System (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). Human lymphocytes were stimulated by phytohemagglutinin, were cultured, and were harvested by standard procedures. The FISH protocols were as described elsewhere (21).

Mutation Analysis.

Because EAD in the newly identified patients could result from a mutation in either ACHET or COLQ, we searched for mutations in both genes. We first analyzed ACHET by amplifying and directly sequencing coding exons 2–4 and 6 and their flanking intronic regions (22). To search for mutations in COLQ, we used the partial genomic sequence obtained as described above and amplified and directly sequenced 17 genomic DNA fragments covering 19 constitutive and 2 alternatively transcribed exons and their flanking intronic or untranslated regions. In patients 1, 3, 4, and 5, we also directly sequenced overlapping RT-PCR products spanning the entire COLQ coding region. After identifying mutations in COLQ, we screened the patients’ relatives for the observed mutations by restriction analysis or allele-specific PCR.

Construction of Expression Vectors.

We amplified the entire coding regions of ACHET (nucleotides −189 to 1,853) and COLQ (nucleotides −92 to 1,471) from normal muscle mRNA, cloned each product into the pTargeT Expression Vector (Promega), and confirmed the absence of PCR artifacts by sequencing the entire inserts. We introduced the S169X, E214X, R282X, 788insC, and 1082delC mutations into COLQ cDNA in the pTargeT vector by using the QuickChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) as described (23). To eliminate exons 2 and 3 (107del215) from COLQ, we used the Seamless Cloning kit (Stratagene). The presence of desired mutations and the absence of unwanted mutations was confirmed by sequencing the entire insert, the promoter, and the polyA signal region.

Expression in COS Cells.

COS-7 cells were grown and were transfected 1 day after spreading by the DEAE-dextran method (24) with 5 μg of ACHET cDNA and 5 μg of wild-type or mutant COLQ cDNA or only with 5 μg of ACHET cDNA per 10-cm dish. The cells were collected for AChE extraction 3 days after transfection.

AChE Extraction.

AChE was extracted from muscle specimens pulverized under liquid nitrogen or from COS cells with a solution containing 50 mM Tris (pH 7.0) 1 M NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.2 mM EGTA, 2 μg/ml leupeptin, and 1 μg/ml pepstatin.

Sedimentation Analysis.

Sedimentation analysis was performed in a 5–20% sucrose density gradient made up in the extraction solution. Samples contained 1 mg of protein of human muscle extract or COS cell extracts equivalent to 50–100 milli-Ellman-units of AChE and marker enzymes with known sedimentation constants: alkaline phosphatase (6.1 S), catalase (11.3 S), and β-galactosidase (16 S). Fraction numbers were converted to S values by using the linear relationship between fraction numbers and the positions of the markers in the gradient. Centrifugation was in a Beckman Ti41SW rotor at 4°C for 21 hr at 38,000 rpm. AChE activity was determined in the gradient fractions by the Ellman method (25) in the presence of 5 × 10−5 M ethopropazine, an inhibitor of butyrylcholinesterase (enzyme classification 3.1.1.8).

RESULTS

Density Gradient Studies of Muscle Extracts.

Density gradient centrifugation was performed on muscle extracts of patients 1, 4, 5, and 6 and on controls. Density gradient studies in patients 2 (15) and 3 (16) were reported previously. AChE extracted from control muscles is resolved into G1, G2, A4/G4, A8, and A12 components (26) (Fig. 1A), but the amplitudes of the A12 and of the G1 and G2 peaks vary from specimen to specimen. AChE extracted from EAD muscles has a different sedimentation profile (Fig. 1 BE); the heteromeric A12 and A8 species are absent and the low amplitude A4/G4 peak that comprises ≈9.5 and 11S components is replaced by a single mutant peak between 10 and 11 S. As in control muscles, the relative amplitudes of the G1 and G2 peaks vary. Similar sedimentation profiles were observed previously in patients 2 (15) and 3 (16), although the mutant peak in these patients was indistinct. Thus, patients 1–6 are deficient in the heteromeric forms of AChE. To investigate the genetic basis of this finding, we first excluded the possibility of a mutation in ACHET that might prevent the association of the globular catalytic subunits with the collagenic tail. Direct sequencing of the entire coding region of ACHET in each patient revealed no mutations. Next, we cloned wild-type human COLQ cDNA, determined the genomic structure and chromosomal localization of COLQ, and then searched for mutations in COLQ.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Density gradient centrifugation of AChE extracted from muscle in control subject (A) and EAD patients 1, 4, 5, and 6 (BE). Mutations in each case are indicated. A and G denote asymmetric and globular species. In each patient extract, the heteromeric A12 and A8 species are absent and the composite G4/A4 peak is replaced by a single mutant ≈10.5S peak. (M, mutant peak.)

Cloning of Human COLQ cDNA.

We first identified a 76-bp human COLQ cDNA fragment, which later proved to be nucleotides 201 to 276, by nested touchdown RT-PCR using mouse cDNA primers. Next, we extended this sequence by 5′- and 3′-RACE. By 5′-RACE, we determined nucleotides −126 to 219 and also an alternative transcriptional start site (discussed below). 3′-RACE identified nucleotides 251 to 1,504. Using the identified human COLQ sequence and the expressed sequence tags database, we found that sequence yw55a10.r1 of IMAGE Consortium Clone 256122 is highly homologous to the 3′ end of human COLQ. Sequencing the entire insert of this clone revealed that it harbored 1,149 bp of the 3′-end of the human COLQ, corresponding to nucleotides 1,306 to 2,454.

The above findings enabled us to identify the nucleotide sequence of the human COLQ from nucleotides −126 to 2,454 and the coding region as extending from nucleotides 1–1,368 (Fig. 2). We excluded PCR or cloning artifacts by directly sequencing overlapping fragments of the entire COLQ cDNA in two normal controls. The predicted human ColQ peptide comprises 455 amino acids. It is 89% homologous to but 3 residues shorter than the predicted rat ColQ peptide (14) and is 58% homologous to but 16 residues shorter than the predicted Torpedo ColQ peptide (13) (Fig. 3). Like rodent (14) and Torpedo (13) ColQ, human ColQ has conserved domains (Fig. 3): (i) a secretion signal peptide at codons 1 to 22; (ii) PRAD at residues 51 to 67 that interacts with ACHET; (iii) two adjacent cysteines at 51 and 52 that form disulfide bonds with the ACHET; (iv) a collagen domain composed of GXY triplets spanning residues 96 to 291 interrupted by a noncollagenous motif at 270–276; (v) conserved cysteines 93, 291, and 293 that stabilize the triple helical collagen domain; (vi) two heparan sulfate proteoglycan binding domains at 130–133 and 235–238 implicated in anchoring the triple helical collagen domain to the basal lamina (27); and (vii) a C-terminal region enriched in charged residues and cysteines.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

cDNA sequence of the human COLQ gene (GenBank accession no. AF057036) and truncation mutations in the patients. Mutations are underlined. The 107del215 mutation results from skipping of exons 2 and 3. Vertical lines indicate exon boundaries. The left and right columns show nucleotide and codon numbers from the translational start site. The 3′ untranslated region is not shown.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Alignment of the amino acid sequences of human, rat (14), partial mouse (14), and Torpedo (13) ColQ and truncation mutations in the patients. Gaps are inserted for alignment. The amino acid sequence encoded by the alternatively transcribed exon 1A also is shown. Closed arrowheads point to the first amino acid deleted by the truncation mutations. Dashes show identical amino acids. Secretion signal peptides are italicized for all species. Collagen domains consisting of GXY triplets are underlined. A black bar indicates the PRAD. Hatched bars indicate heparan sulfate proteoglycan binding domains. Open arrowheads show essential cysteines. The right column indicates codon numbers.

Alternative Transcripts.

The 5′- and 3′-RACE and direct sequencing of RT-PCR products in normal controls disclosed seven different alternative transcripts that were not observed in other species (Fig. 4): (i) One starting from exon 1A substitutes 25 amino acids for 35 wild-type N-terminal amino acids. The transcript encodes a hydrophobic N terminus that may serve as a signal peptide. (ii) An in-frame deletion of exon 3 (nucleotides 220 to 321) that eliminates cysteine 93. (iii) A 13-bp deletion at nucleotides 220 to 232 caused by an activation of a cryptic splice-site in exon 3. (iv) An in-frame deletion of exon 5 (nucleotides 367 to 393) that abolishes a heparan sulfate proteoglycan binding domain. (v) A 142-bp insertion after nucleotide 717 designated exon 11A. (vi) A frameshifting skipping of exon 13 (nucleotides 815 to 954). (vii) A frameshifting skipping of exons 13 to16 (nucleotides 815 to 1,298). RT-PCR analysis detected these alternative transcripts in 32 controls with frequencies ranging from 9/32 to 28/32. The physiological significance of the alternative transcripts remains unknown.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Genomic structure of the human COLQ gene. Exons (boxes) and introns (horizontal lines) are drawn to scale. Splicing marks indicate seven alternative transcripts found in normal controls. Hatched areas show untranslated regions. Closed arrowheads indicate point mutations; black bar indicates skipping of exons 2 and 3.

Genomic Structure of the Human COLQ.

Overlapping long-distance PCR and nested inverse PCR revealed that human COLQ comprises 17 constitutive exons and 2 alternatively transcribed exons, 1A and 11A (Fig. 4). The approximate length from exons 1A to 17 is 50 kb.

FISH.

The COLQ FISH probe hybridizes to a single chromosomal locus at 3p25 (Fig. 5) that is not near to any known neuromuscular disease locus.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Chromosomal localization of COLQ by FISH. In situ hybridization was performed by using a digoxigenin-labeled human COLQ cDNA probe and normal metaphase cells from stimulated blood culture. (A) The digitized image of the COLQ probe signal is localized on both chromatids of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole-enhanced G-banded chromosome 3 from reverse imaging by the Vysis smartcapture system (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL). (B) COLQ is mapped to 3p25

Mutation Analysis.

Direct sequencing of 17 constitutive exons and 2 alternatively transcribed exons of COLQ genomic DNA in our EAD patients revealed five truncation mutations: E214X (patients 1 and 6), S169X (patient 2), R282X (patient 3), 788insC (patient 4), and 1082delC (patients 3 and 5) (Figs. 24 and 6). In addition, direct sequencing of COLQ cDNA in patient 1 showed another truncation mutation consisting of a large-scale frameshifting deletion (107del215) (Figs. 24).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Restriction analysis (A, B, D, and F) and allele-specific PCR (ASP) (C and E) using genomic DNA from patients and their respective relatives. (A to F) Families of patients 1 to 6, respectively. Closed and open arrowheads point to mutant and wild-type fragments. Closed symbols and arrows indicate patients; half-shaded symbols represent asymptomatic carriers. The −46G/A polymorphism in A is linked to the 107del215 mutation.

Patient 1 has two heterozygous mutations, 107del215 and E214X. 107del215 is caused by the skipping of exons 2 and 3 and causes a frameshift after codon 35. This mutation abolishes PRAD and the following domains and predicts 25 missense codons followed by a stop codon. 107del215 mutation was not observed in 32 control muscle mRNA samples. Restriction analysis of the RT-PCR product reveals that the transcript harboring 107del215 has a −46G/A polymorphism. The patient and his mother are heterozygous for −46G/A (Fig. 6A), indicating that 107del215 is inherited from the mother. The other mutation, E214X, which truncates ColQ in the distal third of the collagen domain, is inherited from the father (Fig. 6A).

Patient 2 is homozygous for S169X, which results in loss of the distal two-thirds of the collagen domain. The asymptomatic mother and brother are heterozygous for S169X (Fig. 6B). Patient 3 is heterozygous for R282X and 1082delC. The R282X mutation truncates ColQ at 10 codons upstream to the C-terminal end of the collagen domain. 1082delC causes a frameshift after codon 360, predicting 64 missense codons followed by a stop codon. 1082delC spares the entire collagen domain but abolishes the C-terminal domain of ColQ. The asymptomatic parents are heterozygous for either of these mutations (Fig. 6C)

Patient 4 is homozygous for 788insC, which causes a frameshift after codon 262 predicting 36 missense codons followed by a stop codon. The 788insC mutation spares 85% of the collagen domain. The asymptomatic parents are heterozygous for 788insC (Fig. 6D). Patient 5 is homozygous for 1082delC, which is also present in patient 3. The asymptomatic parents are heterozygous for 1082delC (Fig. 6E). Patient 6 is homozygous for E214X. This mutation also is present in patient 1. The asymptomatic parents are heterozygous for E214X (Fig. 6F).

To summarize, mutation analysis reveals that patients 1 and 3 have two heterozygous mutations, and patients 2, 4, 5, and 6 have homozygous mutations. All mutations cause truncation of ColQ and are recessive, loss-of-function mutations.

Expression Studies in COS Cells.

To confirm that the observed COLQ mutations account for the absence of asymmetric AChE in EAD, we genetically engineered each mutation into COLQ cDNA and coexpressed it with wild-type ACHET cDNA in COS cells. As controls, we expressed wild-type ACHET with or without wild-type COLQ.

Extracts of COS cells transfected with wild-type ACHET and COLQ display the same A12, A8, and A4 asymmetric and G4, G2, and G1 globular AChE components that are detected in extracts of normal muscle (see Figs. 1A and 7A). Cells transfected only with wild-type ACHET express prominent G1 and G2 peaks and a small composite peak with ≈10.5S and ≈13.5S components that likely includes nonamphiphilic G4 molecules and an unstable nonamphiphilic higher molecular weight aggregate of the globular species (28) (Fig. 7B).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Sedimentation profiles of AChE species extracted from COS cells transfected with wild-type ACHET and COLQ (A), wild-type ACHET (B), and with wild-type ACHET plus COLQ mutants (CH). Solid lines in all panels indicate sedimentation in the presence of 0.5% Triton X-100; interrupted lines in A and E show sedimentation in the presence of 1% Brij-97. (M, mutant peak.)

Cotransfection of the 107del215 mutant, which lacks PRAD, with wild-type ACHET produces a sedimentation profile identical with that obtained after transfection with ACHET alone (Fig. 7C). Thus, no moieties of asymmetric AChE are present, and the mutant peptide, if expressed, fails to bind catalytic subunits.

Cotransfection of the five other COLQ mutants with wild-type ACHET produces qualitatively similar sedimentation profiles (Fig. 7 DH): (i) None of the profiles contain the asymmetric A4, A8, or A12 moieties detected in the control extract in Fig. 7A. (ii) G1 and G2 peaks appear in each profile but their relative amplitudes vary. (iii) Each profile contains a ≈10.5S mutant peak whose sedimentation coefficient is slightly greater than that of G4 in the control extract; this peak is prominent with S169X, E214X, 788insC, and R282X (Fig. 7 DG) but of lower amplitude with 1082delC (Fig. 7H). (iv) A small shoulder of variable size appears left to each mutant peak (Fig. 7 DG); this may correspond to an unstable nonamphiphilic higher molecular weight aggregate of the globular species (28). Centrifugation in the presence of 1% Brij-97 instead of 0.5% Triton X-100 retards the migration of the amphiphilic G1 and G2 peaks (28) (data shown as dotted lines for wild-type and E214X mutant in Fig. 7 A and E) but has no effect on the mutant peaks in the mutant extracts or on the asymmetric peaks in the control extract. Therefore, the mutant peaks, like the asymmetric peaks, contain nonamphiphilic catalytic subunits (6, 28). To summarize, the expression studies indicate that ColQ truncated proximal to PRAD does not associate with ACHET and that ColQ truncated distal to PRAD results in expression of a mutant ≈10.5S species of AChE.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we first cloned the human cDNA encoding the collagen-like tail subunit of asymmetric AChE by homology PCR and RACE. We established the molecular identity of the translational product by its ability to associate with ACHET in COS cells to yield the same asymmetric forms of AChE as detected in normal human muscle. Knowledge of the cDNA and genomic sequence of COLQ enabled us to detect truncation mutations in EAD patients. Finally, we confirmed the pathogenicity of the mutations by showing that COS cells cotransfected with wild-type ACHET and each COLQ mutant fail to assemble the asymmetric species of AChE detected in normal muscle. The 107del215 mutation truncates ColQ N-terminal to PRAD, the domain essential for attachment of ColQ to ACHET (8). Indeed, the mutant peptide fails to associate with ACHET in COS cells (see Fig. 7C).

Four mutations distal to PRAD (S169X, E214X, 788insC, and R282X) truncate ColQ in its collagen domain, and one (1082delC) truncates it in its C-terminal domain. All of these mutations generate a nonamphiphilic ≈10.5S mutant species of AChE (see Fig. 7 DH). The sedimentation coefficient of the mutant peak cannot be distinguished from that of G4 within experimental error, but other evidence suggests that the mutant species consists of G4 linked to the truncated peptide. First, the mutant species is not observed with 107del215 (see Fig. 7C); therefore, expression of the mutant depends on the presence of PRAD that can bind the catalytic subunits. Second, our expression studies are analogous to experiments by Bon et al. (8, 28), who cotransfected COS cells with genetically engineered truncation mutants of Torpedo ColQ and wild-type rat ACHET. Torpedo ColQ peptides truncated N terminal to PRAD, like our 107del215 mutant, did not bind ACHET subunits. Peptides truncated distal to PRAD bound ACHET tetramers to form a prominent nonamphiphilic 10.3S peak that was recognized by an anti-Torpedo-ColQ antibody (8, 28). Some EAD muscle extracts also contain a small mutant species (see Fig. 1), but this does not incorporate into the basal lamina. Quantitative differences between mutant species in COS cells versus EAD muscle could arise from different stabilities of the mutant transcripts or different secretion rates of the mutant proteins in the heterologous expression systems.

None of the mutant ColQs truncated distal to PRAD binds more than one AChET tetramer to form mutant A8 or A12 complexes, indicating that these mutants consist of a single peptide strand. This likely stems from the absence of the C-terminal domain that, in most collagen species, is crucial for initiating assembly of the triple helix that proceeds from a C- to N-terminal direction in a zipper-like fashion (29, 30). Triple helix formation, in turn, is essential for the clustering of basic residues of the heparan sulfate proteoglycan binding domains that serve to anchor the asymmetric forms in the basal lamina (27). Finally, the pathogenicity of the 1082delC mutant, which eliminates only the terminal 94 residues (362 to 455) of ColQ, implicates these residues as essential for triple helix formation and basal lamina insertion.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. S. M. Jalal, Cytogenetics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, for assistance with FISH analysis. This work was supported by Grants NS6277 from the National Institutes of Health and by a research grant from the Muscular Dystrophy Association.

ABBREVIATIONS

AChE

acetylcholinesterase

ACHET

T isoform of catalytic subunit

AChR

acetylcholine receptor

COS

SV-40-transformed monkey kidney fibroblast

EP

endplate

EAD

EP AChE deficiency

FISH

fluorescence in situ hybridization

PRAD

proline-rich attachment domain

RACE

rapid amplification of cDNA ends

RT-PCR

reverse transcription–PCR

Footnotes

Data deposition: The sequence reported in this paper has been deposited in the GenBank database (accession no. AF057036).

A commentary on this article begins on p. 9070.

References

  • 1.Katz B, Miledi R. J Physiol (London) 1973;231:549–574. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Katz B, Thesleff S. J Physiol (London) 1957;138:63–80. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maselli R A, Soliven B C. Muscle Nerve. 1991;14:1182–1188. doi: 10.1002/mus.880141207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Salpeter M M, Kasprzak H, Feng H, Fertuck H. J Neurocytol. 1979;8:95–115. doi: 10.1007/BF01206461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dettbarn W D. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1984;4:S18–S26. doi: 10.1016/0272-0590(84)90134-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Massoulié J, Pezzementi L, Bon S, Krejci E, Valette F-M. Prog Neurobiol. 1993;41:31–91. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(93)90040-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rotundo R L, Fambrough D M. In: Myology. Engel A G, Franzini-Armstrong C, editors. New York: McGraw–Hill; 1994. pp. 607–623. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bon S, Coussen F, Massoulié J. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:3016–3021. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.5.3016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hall Z W. J Neurobiol. 1973;4:343–361. doi: 10.1002/neu.480040404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Younkin S G, Rosenstein C, Collins P L, Rosenberry T L. J Biol Chem. 1982;257:13630–13637. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schumacher M, Maulet Y, Camp S, Taylor P. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:18979–18987. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Maulet Y, Camp S, Gibney G, Rachinsky T L, Ekstrom T J, Taylor P. Neuron. 1990;4:289–301. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90103-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Krejci E, Coussen F, Duval N, Chatel J-M, Legay C, Puype M, Vandekerckhove J, Cartaud J, Bon S, Massoulié J. EMBO J. 1991;10:1285–1293. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb08070.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Krejci E, Thomine S, Boschetti N, Legay C, Sketelj J, Massoulié J. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:22840–22847. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.36.22840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Engel A G, Lambert E H, Gomez M R. Ann Neurol. 1977;1:315–330. doi: 10.1002/ana.410010403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hutchinson D O, Walls T J, Nakano S, Camp S, Taylor P, Harper C M, Groover R V, Peterson H A, Jamieson D G, Engel A G. Brain. 1993;116:633–653. doi: 10.1093/brain/116.3.633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hutchinson D O, Engel A G, Walls T J, Nakano S, Camp S, Taylor P, Harper C M, Brengman J M. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;681:469–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb22931.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Camp S, Bon S, Li Y, Getman D K, Engel A G, Massoulié J, Taylor P. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:333–340. doi: 10.1172/JCI117661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ohno K, Hutchinson D O, Milone M, Brengman J M, Bouzat C, Sine S M, Engel A G. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:758–762. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.3.758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Don R H, Cox P T, Wainwright B J, Baker K, Mattick J S. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19:4008. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.14.4008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Crifasi P A, Michels V V, Driscoll D J, Jalal S M, Dewald G. Mayo Clin Proc. 1995;70:1148–1153. doi: 10.4065/70.12.1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li Y, Camp S, Rachinsky T L, Getman D, Taylor P. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:23083–23090. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ohno K, Quiram P, Milone M, Wang H-L, Harper C M, Pruitt J N, Brengman J M, Pao L, Fischbeck K H, Crawford T O, et al. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6:753–766. doi: 10.1093/hmg/6.5.753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Selden R F, Burke-Howie K, Rowe M E, Goodman H M, Moore D D. Mol Cell Biol. 1986;6:3173–3179. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.9.3173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ellman G L, Courtney K D, Andres V, Featherstone R M. Biochem Pharmacol. 1961;7:88–95. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bon S, Vigny M, Massoulié J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979;76:2546–2550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.6.2546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Deprez P N, Inestrosa N C. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:11043–11046. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.19.11043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bon S, Massoulié J. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:3007–3015. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.5.3007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dölz R, Engel J, Kühn K. Eur J Biochem. 1988;178:357–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb14458.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Prockop D J, Kivirikko K I. Annu Rev Biochem. 1995;64:403–434. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.002155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES