Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1973 Jan 31;137(2):224–238. doi: 10.1084/jem.137.2.224

REGULATION OF AUTOSENSITIZATION

THE IMMUNE ACTIVATION AND SPECIFIC INHIBITION OF SELF-RECOGNIZING THYMUS-DERIVED LYMPHOCYTES

Irun R Cohen 1, Hartmut Wekerle 1
PMCID: PMC2139474  PMID: 4539845

Abstract

We studied the mechanisms underlying the natural tolerance of thymus-derived (T) lymphocytes for self-antigens. Lymphocytes from the thymus or lymph nodes of inbred rats were autosensitized in vitro against monolayers of autochthonous thymus reticulum cells or syngeneic fibroblasts. Receptors for self-antigens were detected by the specific adherence of normal lymphocytes to syngeneic cells. The achievement of active cell-mediated autosensitization was assayed by measuring the immunospecific lysis of syngeneic target cells in vitro, or graft-versus-host (GvH) reactions in vivo. The following observations were made using these systems. (a) A fraction of normal lymphocytes was found to have specific surface receptors that are able to recognize self-antigens which seem to be accessible in vivo. These potentially self-reactive lymphocytes were activated by incubation with syngeneic or autochthonous cells in vitro. Hence, the elimination of potentially self-reactive lymphocytes cannot be the only basis for natural self-tolerance. Therefore, the maintenance of self-tolerance in vivo appears to involve suppression of the immune reactivity of such self-tolerant lymphocytes. (b) We found that control of autosensitization depends upon the inhibition of the recognition of self-antigens. A GvH reaction in vivo could not be suppressed once recognition of self-antigens had occurred in vitro. Moreover, studies of the kinetics of antigen recognition indicated that several hours of incubation in vitro were needed for the inactivation of factors specifically inhibiting self-recognition. (c) We found that factors which inhibit self-recognition are present in fresh autologous serum. Treatment of the lymphocytes, but not syngeneic adsorbing cells, with autologous serum prevented recognition of syngeneic antigens. Allogeneic serum did not prevent self-recognition, and autologous serum did not inhibit the recognition of foreign antigens. These findings indicate that natural tolerance of T lymphocytes to self-antigens can be regulated by serum factors which act on the lymphocytes. The immunospecificity of the inhibitory effect suggests that these factors may be soluble self-antigens in a tolerogenic form.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ada G. L. Antigen binding cells in tolerance and immunity. Transplant Rev. 1970;5:105–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1970.tb00358.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bach F. H., Widmer M. B., Segall M., Bach M. L., Klein J. Genetic and immunological complexity of major histocompatibility regions. Science. 1972 Jun 2;176(4038):1024–1027. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4038.1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bach M. L., Alter B., Zoschke D., Bach F. H. Soluble adherent cell activity permitting purified lymphocyte response. Transplant Proc. 1971 Mar;3(1):844–847. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berke G., Ax W., Ginsburg H., Feldman M. Graft reaction in tissue culture. II. Quantification of the lytic action on mouse fibroblasts by rat lymphocytes sensitized on mouse embryo monolayers. Immunology. 1969 May;16(5):643–657. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Birnbaum G., Siskind G. W., Weksler M. E. Autologous and allogeneic stimulation of peripheral human leukocytes. Cell Immunol. 1972 Jan;3(1):44–52. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(72)90224-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Byers V. S., Sercarz E. E. Induction and reversal of immune paralysis in vitro. J Exp Med. 1970 Nov;132(5):845–857. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.5.845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cerottini J. C., Nordin A. A., Brunner K. T. Cellular and humoral response to transplantation antigens. I. Development of alloantibody-forming cells and cytotoxic lymphocytes in the graft-versus-host reaction. J Exp Med. 1971 Aug 1;134(2):553–564. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.2.553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chiller J. M., Habicht G. S., Weigle W. O. Kinetic differences in unresponsiveness of thymus and bone marrow cells. Science. 1971 Feb 26;171(3973):813–815. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3973.813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen I. R., Feldman M. The lysis of fibroblasts by lymphocytes sensitized in vitro: specific antigen activates a nonspecific effect. Cell Immunol. 1970 Nov;1(5):521–535. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(70)90039-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen I. R., Globerson A., Feldman M. Autosensitization in vitro. J Exp Med. 1971 Apr 1;133(4):834–845. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.4.834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cohen I. R., Stavy L., Feldman M. Glucocorticoids and cellular immunity in vitro. Facilitation of the sensitization phase and inhibition of the effector phase of a lymphocyte anti-fibroblast reaction. J Exp Med. 1970 Dec 1;132(6):1055–1070. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.6.1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cohen I. R., Wekerle H. Autosensitization of lymphocytes against thymus reticulum cells. Science. 1972 Jun 23;176(4041):1324–1325. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4041.1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cone R. E., Marchalonis J. J., Rolley R. T. Lymphocyte membrane dynamics. Metabolic release of cell surface proteins. J Exp Med. 1971 Dec 1;134(6):1373–1384. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.6.1373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Feldmann M., Diener E. Antibody-mediated suppression of the immune response in vitro. I. Evidence for a central effect. J Exp Med. 1970 Feb;131(2):247–274. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.2.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ford W. L., Burr W., Simonsen M. A lymph node weight assay for the graft-versus-host activity of rat lymphoid cells. Transplantation. 1970 Sep;10(3):258–266. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197009000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gershon R. K., Cohen P., Hencin R., Liebhaber S. A. Suppressor T cells. J Immunol. 1972 Mar;108(3):586–590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ginsburg H. Graft versus host reaction in tissue culture. I. Lysis of monolayers of embryo mouse cells from strains differing in the H-2 histocompatibility locus by rat lymphocytes sensitized in vitro. Immunology. 1968 May;14(5):621–635. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jerne N. K. The somatic generation of immune recognition. Eur J Immunol. 1971 Jan;1(1):1–9. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830010102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Katz D. H., Davie J. M., Paul W. E., Benacerraf B. Carrier function in anti-hapten antibody responses. IV. Experimental conditions for the induction of hapten-specific tolerance or for the stimulation of anti-hapten anamnestic responses by "nonimmunogenic" hapten-polypeptide conjugates. J Exp Med. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):201–223. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lonai P., Wekerle H., Feldman M. Fractionation of specific antigen-reactive cells in an in vitro system of cell-mediated immunity. Nat New Biol. 1972 Feb 23;235(60):235–236. doi: 10.1038/newbio235235a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McGregor D. D., McCullagh P. J., Gowans J. L. The role of lymphocytes in antibody formation. I. Restoration of the haemolysin response in x-irradiated rats with lymphocytes from normal and immunologically tolerant donors. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1967 Sep 12;168(1012):229–243. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1967.0063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Micklem H. S., Asfi C., Staines N. A., Anderson N. Quantitative study of cells reacting to skin allografts. Nature. 1970 Aug 29;227(5261):947–949. doi: 10.1038/227947a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Naor D., Sulitzeanu D. Binding of 125I-BSA to lymphoid cells of tolerant mice. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1969;36(1):112–113. doi: 10.1159/000230728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ramseier H., Lindenmann J. Aliotypic antibodies. Transplant Rev. 1972;10:57–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1972.tb01539.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shearer G. M., Melmon K. L., Weinstein Y., Sela M. Regulation of antibody response by cells expressing histamine receptors. J Exp Med. 1972 Nov 1;136(5):1302–1307. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.5.1302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sjöberg O. Antigen-binding cells in mice immune or tolerant to Escherichia coli polysaccharide. J Exp Med. 1971 May 1;133(5):1015–1025. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.5.1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sjöberg O. Rapid breaking of tolerance against Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide in vivo and in vitro. J Exp Med. 1972 Apr 1;135(4):850–859. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.4.850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Voisin G. A., Kinsky R. G., Duc H. T. Immune status of mice tolerant of living cells. II. Continuous presence and nature of facilitation-enhancing antibodies in tolerant animals. J Exp Med. 1972 May 1;135(5):1185–1203. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.5.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wegmann T. G., Hellström I., Hellström K. E. Immunological tolerance: "forbidden clones" allowed in tetraparental mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Jul;68(7):1644–1647. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.7.1644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Weigle W. O. Recent observations and concepts in immunological unresponsiveness and autoimmunity. Clin Exp Immunol. 1971 Oct;9(4):437–447. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wekerle H., Lonai P., Feldman M. Fractionation of antigen reactive cells on a cellular immunoadsorbent: factors determining recognition of antigens by T-lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Jun;69(6):1620–1624. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.6.1620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wilson D. B., Silvers W. K., Nowell P. C. Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. II. Relationship of the proliferative response to the immunologic status of the donors. J Exp Med. 1967 Oct 1;126(4):655–665. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.4.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. van Boehmer H., Byrd W. J. Responsiveness of thymus cells to syngeneic and allogeneic lymphoid cells. Nat New Biol. 1972 Jan 12;235(54):50–52. doi: 10.1038/newbio235050a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES