Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1974 Mar 1;139(3):528–542. doi: 10.1084/jem.139.3.528

INFLUENCE OF DOSE AND ROUTE OF ANTIGEN INJECTION ON THE IMMUNOLOGICAL INDUCTION OF T CELLS

P H Lagrange 1, G B Mackaness 1, T E Miller 1
PMCID: PMC2139541  PMID: 4591170

Abstract

Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) develops in the absence of an adjuvant when mice are injected intravenously or subcutaneously with an appropriate dose of sheep red blood cells (SRBC). The optimal intravenous dose of 105 SRBC (in CD-1 mice) produces maximum DTH which decays exponentially from its peak on day 4. Increasing the dose of SRBC reduces and eventually abolishes all evidence of DTH. DTH fails to reappear in respose to secondary stimulation except in splenectomized mice in whom the development of DTH is not suppressed, even by massive doses of SRBC. Hence the suppression cannot be due to antigen as such. The optimal dose of SRBC for sensitization by footpad inoculation is 100-fold higher (107 SRBC in CD-1 mice), but even 109 SRBC do not block the induction of DTH by this route of immunization. A blocking dose of SRBC, given intravenously 1 day before footpad inoculation, completely suppresses cell proliferation in the draining lymph node, prevents PFC production there, and blocks the induction of DTH by a sensitizing dose of SRBC. If given 1 day after footpad sensitization, intravenous antigen has little effect on the cellular response in the regional node but DTH is still completely suppressed. Blocking of induction and expression may depend, therefore, on different mechanisms.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (813.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADLER F. L. STUDIES ON MOUSE ANTIBODIES. I. THE RESPONSE TO SHEEP RED CELLS. J Immunol. 1965 Jul;95:26–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Axelrad M. A. Suppression of delayed hypersensitivity by antigen and antibody. Is a common precursor cell responsible for both delayed hypersensitivity and antibody formation? Immunology. 1968 Aug;15(2):159–171. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Axelrad M., Rowley D. A. Hypersensitivity: specific immunologic suppression of the delayed type. Science. 1968 Jun 28;160(3835):1465–1467. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3835.1465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BLOCH H., NORDIN A. A. Production of tuberculin sensitivity. Nature. 1960 Jul 30;187:434–435. doi: 10.1038/187434a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coe J. E., Feldman J. D., Lee S. Immunologic competence of thoracic duct cells. I. Delayed hypersensitivity. J Exp Med. 1966 Feb 1;123(2):267–281. doi: 10.1084/jem.123.2.267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davies A. J., Leuchars E., Wallis V., Koller P. C. The mitotic response of thymus-derived cells to antigenic stimulus. Transplantation. 1966 Jul;4(4):438–451. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196607000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Delorme E. J., Hodgett J., Hall J. G., Alexander P. The cellular immune response to primary sarcomata in rats. I. The significance of large basophilic cells in the thoracic duct lymph following antigenic challenge. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1969 Nov 18;174(1035):229–236. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1969.0089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hall J. G., Morris B. The immediate effect of antigens on the cell output of a lymph node. Br J Exp Pathol. 1965 Aug;46(4):450–454. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kappler J. W., Hoffmann M. Regulation of the immune response. 3. Kinetic differences between thymus- and bone marrow- derived lymphocytes in the proliferative response to heterologous erythrocytes. J Exp Med. 1973 Jun 1;137(6):1325–1337. doi: 10.1084/jem.137.6.1325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lamelin J. P., Lisowska-Bernstein B., Matter A., Ryser J. E., Vassalli P. Mouse thymus-independent and thymus-derived lymphoid cells. I. Immunofluorescent and functional studies. J Exp Med. 1972 Nov 1;136(5):984–1007. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.5.984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mackaness G. B., Auclair D. J., Lagrange P. H. Immunopotentiation with BCG. I. Immune response to different strains and preparations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1973 Nov;51(5):1655–1667. doi: 10.1093/jnci/51.5.1655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mackaness G. B., Lagrange P. H., Miller T. E., Ishibashi T. Feedback inhibition of specifically sensitized lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1974 Mar 1;139(3):543–559. doi: 10.1084/jem.139.3.543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miller T. E., Mackaness G. B., Lagrange P. H. Immunopotentiation with BCG. II. Modulation of the response to sheep red blood cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1973 Nov;51(5):1669–1676. doi: 10.1093/jnci/51.5.1669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nelson D. S., Mildenhall P. Studies on cytophilic antibodies. 1. The production by mice of macrophage cytophilic antibodies to sheep erythrocytes: relationship to the production of other antibodies and the development of delayed-type hypersensitivity. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1967 Apr;45(2):113–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. North R. J., Mackaness G. B., Elliott R. W. The histogenesis of immunologically committed lymphocytes. Cell Immunol. 1972 Apr;3(4):680–694. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(72)90130-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. O'Toole C. M., Davies A. J. Pre-emption in immunity. Nature. 1971 Mar 19;230(5290):187–189. doi: 10.1038/230187a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. PAPPENHEIMER A. M., Jr, UHR J. W., YONEDA M. Delayed hypersensitivity. I. Induction of hypersensitivity to diphtheria toxin in guinea pigs by infection with Corynebacterium diphtheriae. J Exp Med. 1957 Jan 1;105(1):1–9. doi: 10.1084/jem.105.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Parish C. R. Immune response to chemically modified flagellin. II. Evidence for a fundamental relationship between humoral and cell-mediated immunity. J Exp Med. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):21–47. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Parish C. R. Preferential induction of cell-mediated immunity by chemically modified sheep erythrocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1972 Apr;2(2):143–151. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830020210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pearson M. N., Raffel S. Macrophage-digested antigen as inducer of delayed hypersensitivity. J Exp Med. 1971 Mar 1;133(3):494–505. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.3.494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Radovich J., Talmage D. W. Antigenic competition: cellular or humoral. Science. 1967 Oct 27;158(3800):512–514. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3800.512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rowley D. A., Gowans J. L., Atkins R. C., Ford W. L., Smith M. E. The specific selection of recirculating lymphocytes by antigen in normal and preimmunized rats. J Exp Med. 1972 Sep 1;136(3):499–513. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.3.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Seeger R. C., Oppenheim J. J. Macrophage-bound antigens. I. Induction of delayed hypersensitivity and priming for production of serum antibodies in guinea pigs. J Immunol. 1972 Aug;109(2):244–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Uhr J. W. Delayed hypersensitivity. Physiol Rev. 1966 Jul;46(3):359–419. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1966.46.3.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Unanue E. R., Feldman J. D. Role of macrophages in delayed hypersensitivity. I. Induction with macrophage-bound antigen. Cell Immunol. 1971 Jun;2(3):269–274. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(71)90046-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zinsser H., Mueller J. H. ON THE NATURE OF BACTERIAL ALLERGIES. J Exp Med. 1925 Jan 1;41(1):159–177. doi: 10.1084/jem.41.1.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES