Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1974 Mar 1;139(3):679–695. doi: 10.1084/jem.139.3.679

ALLOANTISERUM-INDUCED INHIBITION OF IMMUNE RESPONSE GENE PRODUCT FUNCTION

II. GENETIC ANALYSIS OF TARGET ANTIGENS

Ethan M Shevach 1, Ira Green 1, William E Paul 1
PMCID: PMC2139552  PMID: 4591175

Abstract

It has been previously demonstrated that alloantisera can specifically block the activation of T lymphocytes by antigens, the response to which is linked to the presence of histocompatibility (H) types against which the alloantisera are directed. Thus, strain 13 anti-2 serum can inhibit the activation of (2 x 13)F1 T lymphocytes by a DNP derivative of a copolymer of L-glutamic acid and L-lysine (DNP-GL), an antigen the response to which is controlled by a 2-linked Ir gene. It was proposed that alloantisera can inhibit T-lymphocyte antigen recognition through interference with the activity of immune response (Ir) gene products. In order to further study whether the inhibitory antibodies within the alloantisera are directed against H antigens or against the products of the Ir genes, we have examined whether the anti-2 serum can inhibit the function of an Ir gene (the L-glutamic acid and L-alanine [GA] gene), which is normally linked to strain 2 H genes when this gene occurs in an outbred animal lacking strain 2 H genes. In the majority of cases, the anti-2 serum was capable of inhibiting the in vitro proliferative response to GA of T cells derived from animals that were GA+2+, but the serum had little if any effect on the GA response of T cells from GA+2- animals. Furthermore, an antiserum prepared in strain 13 animals against the lymphoid cells of a GA+2- outbred animal was devoid of inhibitory activity on the GA response of cells from a (2 x 13)F1, while an antiserum prepared in strain 13 animals against the lymphoid cells of a GA+2+ outbred animal was capable of specifically inhibiting the response to GA. It thus appears that the inhibition of the GA response by the anti-2 serum is primarily mediated via antibodies directed toward strain 2 H antigens rather than antibodies specific for the product of the GA Ir gene. The mechanism of alloantiserum induced suppression of Ir gene function would then be by steric interference with the Ir gene product on the cell surface, rather than by direct binding to it. This conclusion implies that the products of both the H genes and the Ir genes are physically related on the cell surface. The implications of such a relationship in terms of the fluid-mosaic model of the lymphocyte surface are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (954.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bluestein H. G., Ellman L., Green I., Benacerraf B. Specific immune response genes of the guinea pig. 3. Linkage of the GA and GT immune response genes to histocompatibility genotypes in inbred guinea pigs. J Exp Med. 1971 Dec 1;134(6):1529–1537. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.6.1529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bluestein H. G., Green I., Benacerraf B. Specific immune response genes of the guinea pig. I. Dominant genetic control of immune responsiveness to copolymers of L-glutamic acid and L-alanine and L-glutamic acid and L-tyrosine. J Exp Med. 1971 Aug 1;134(2):458–470. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.2.458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bluestein H. G., Green I., Benacerraf B. Specific immune response genes of the guinea pig. II. Relationship between the poly-L-lysine gene and the genes controlling immune responsiveness to copolymers of L-glutamic acid and L-alanine and L-glutamic acid and L-tyrosine in random-bred Hartley guinea pigs. J Exp Med. 1971 Aug 1;134(2):471–481. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.2.471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. David C. S., Shreffler D. C., Frelinger J. A. New lymphocyte antigen system (Lna) controlled by the Ir region of the mouse H-2 complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Sep;70(9):2509–2514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.9.2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ellman L., Green I., Martin W. J., Benacerraf B. Linkage between the poly-L-lysine gene and the locus controlling the major histocompatibility antigens in strain 2 guinea pigs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Jun;66(2):322–328. doi: 10.1073/pnas.66.2.322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Greaves M. F., Bauminger S., Janossy G. Lymphocyte activation. 3. Binding sites for phytomitogens on lymphocyte subpopulations. Clin Exp Immunol. 1972 Mar;10(3):537–554. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hauptfeld V., Klein D., Klein J. Serological identification of an Ir-region product. Science. 1973 Jul 13;181(4095):167–169. doi: 10.1126/science.181.4095.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. KANTOR F. S., OJEDA A., BENCARERRAF B. Studies on artifical antigens. I. Antigenicity of DNP-polylysine and DNP copolymer of lysine and glutamic acid in guinea pigs. J Exp Med. 1963 Jan 1;117:55–69. doi: 10.1084/jem.117.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Katz D. H., Hamaoka T., Dorf M. E., Maurer P. H., Benacerraf B. Cell interactions between histoincompatible T and B lymphocytes. IV. Involvement of the immune response (Ir) gene in the control of lymphocyte interactions in responses controlled by the gene. J Exp Med. 1973 Sep 1;138(3):734–739. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.3.734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kourilsky F. M., Silvestre D., Neauport-Sautes C., Loosfelt Y., Dausset J. Antibody-induced redistribution of HL-A antigens at the cell surface. Eur J Immunol. 1972 Jun;2(3):249–257. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830020311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Martin W. J., Ellman L., Green I., Benacerraf B. Histocompatibility type and immune responsiveness in random bred Hartley strain guinea pigs. J Exp Med. 1970 Dec 1;132(6):1259–1266. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.6.1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rosenstreich D. L., Blake J. T., Rosenthal A. S. The peritoneal exudate lymphocyte. I. Differences in antigen responsiveness between peritoneal exudate and lymph node lymphocytes from immunized guinea pigs. J Exp Med. 1971 Nov 1;134(5):1170–1186. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.5.1170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shevach E. M., Paul W. E., Green I. Histocompatibility-linked immune response gene function in guinea pigs. Specific inhibition of antigen-induced lymphocyte proliferation by alloantisera. J Exp Med. 1972 Nov 1;136(5):1207–1221. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.5.1207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shevach E. M., Rosenstreich D. L., Green I. The distribution of histocompatibility antigens on T and B cells in the guinea pig. Transplantation. 1973 Aug;16(2):126–133. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197308000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shevach E. M., Rosenthal A. S. Function of macrophages in antigen recognition by guinea pig T lymphocytes. II. Role of the macrophage in the regulation of genetic control of the immune response. J Exp Med. 1973 Nov 1;138(5):1213–1229. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.5.1213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Singer S. J., Nicolson G. L. The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science. 1972 Feb 18;175(4023):720–731. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4023.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES