Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1974 Apr 1;139(4):801–819. doi: 10.1084/jem.139.4.801

INTERACTION OF CHOLERA TOXIN AND TOXIN DERIVATIVES WITH LYMPHOCYTES

I. BINDING PROPERTIES AND INTERFERENCE WITH LECTIN-INDUCED CELLULAR STIMULATION

J Holmgren 1, L Lindholm 1, I Lönnroth 1
PMCID: PMC2139570  PMID: 4361243

Abstract

The interaction of cholera toxin and a number of toxin derivatives, containing different proportions of light and heavy toxin-composing subunits (L and H), with mouse lymphocytes was studied. Experiments with [125I]toxin showed that a single cell can rapidly, within minutes, bind up to 40,000 molecules of toxin, the association constant was estimated to 7 ± 4 x 108 liters/mol, and binding was found to be very similar at 37°C and 5°C. Immunofluorescence studies revealed that the toxin attachment is located on the cell surface, and that purified L subunit but not H subunit binds to the cells. A natural cholera toxoid, built up by aggregated L subunits, showed almost identical binding properties as toxin to the cells. Pure GM1 ganglioside, the proposed membrane receptor structure for toxin, prevented entirely the cellular binding of both toxin and toxoid. Cholera toxin in concentrations down to approximately 5 x 10–11 mol/liter (corresponding to 10 bound molecules/cell) inhibited thymus cells from being stimulated to DNA synthesis by concanavalin A (con A), and spleen cells from such stimulation by phytohemagglutinin. The GM1 ganglioside but not a series of other pure structurally related gangliosides and neutral glycosphingolipids neutralized this toxin activity. Toxin derivatives which, in similarity with toxin, possessed H as well as L subunits but in other proportions, were potent inhibitors of con A-induced thymocyte stimulation, whereas the natural toxoid (aggregated L subunits), purified toxin L subunit and purified toxin H subunit were up to 300-fold less active on a weight basis. The capacity of cholera proteins to inhibit con A-induced thymocyte stimulation correlated well with their activity in the rabbit intradermal toxicity assay. The inhibitory action of cholera toxin on con A-induced thymocyte stimulation did not depend on decreased cell viability from the toxin treatment, nor was it caused by a reaction between toxin and con A. [125I]con A bound equally well to the cells when toxin was present as when it was absent, which proves that the toxin did not compete for cellular con A receptors. Nor did the toxin seem to disturb the general mobility of membrane receptors or their ability to accumulate in caps. It is concluded that the L type of subunit confers rapid and firm binding of cholera toxin to lymphocyte membranes, probably to GM1 ganglioside receptors. For biologic activity the additional presence of H subunit is important. One manifestation of toxin action on lymphocytes is inhibition of lectin-induced DNA synthesis; probably this effect relates to the ability of cholera toxin to raise the levels of intracellular cyclic 3'5'-adenosine monophosphate.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Craig J. P. A permeability factor (toxin) found in cholera stools and culture filtrates and its neutralization by convalescent cholera sera. Nature. 1965 Aug 7;207(997):614–616. doi: 10.1038/207614a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cuatrecasas P. Gangliosides and membrane receptors for cholera toxin. Biochemistry. 1973 Aug 28;12(18):3558–3566. doi: 10.1021/bi00742a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cuatrecasas P. Interaction of Vibrio cholerae enterotoxin with cell membranes. Biochemistry. 1973 Aug 28;12(18):3547–3558. doi: 10.1021/bi00742a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Donta S. T., King M., Sloper K. Induction of steroidogenesis in tissue culture by cholera enterotoxin. Nat New Biol. 1973 Jun 20;243(129):246–247. doi: 10.1038/newbio243246a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edelman G. M., Yahara I., Wang J. L. Receptor mobility and receptor-cytoplasmic interactions in lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 May;70(5):1442–1446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.5.1442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Finkelstein R. A., LoSpalluto J. J. Crystalline cholera toxin and toxoid. Science. 1972 Feb 4;175(4021):529–530. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4021.529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Finkelstein R. A., LoSpalluto J. J. Production of highly purified choleragen and choleragenoid. J Infect Dis. 1970 May;121(Suppl):63+–63+. doi: 10.1093/infdis/121.supplement.s63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gill D. M., Pappenheimer A. M., Jr, Uchida T. Diphtheria toxin, protein synthesis, and the cell. Fed Proc. 1973 Apr;32(4):1508–1515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HUNTER W. M., GREENWOOD F. C. Preparation of iodine-131 labelled human growth hormone of high specific activity. Nature. 1962 May 5;194:495–496. doi: 10.1038/194495a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Henney C. S., Lichtenstein L. M. The role of cyclic AMP in the cytolytic activity of lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1971 Aug;107(2):610–612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Holmgren J. Comparison of the tissue receptors for Vibrio cholerae and Escherichia coli enterotoxins by means of gangliosides and natural cholera toxoid. Infect Immun. 1973 Dec;8(6):851–859. doi: 10.1128/iai.8.6.851-859.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Holmgren J., Lönnroth I., Svennerholm L. Fixation and inactivation of cholera toxin by GM1 ganglioside. Scand J Infect Dis. 1973;5(1):77–78. doi: 10.3109/inf.1973.5.issue-1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Holmgren J., Lönnroth I., Svennerholm L. Tissue receptor for cholera exotoxin: postulated structure from studies with GM1 ganglioside and related glycolipids. Infect Immun. 1973 Aug;8(2):208–214. doi: 10.1128/iai.8.2.208-214.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. King C. A., Van Heyningen W. E. Deactivation of cholera toxin by a sialidase-resistant monosialosylganglioside. J Infect Dis. 1973 Jun;127(6):639–647. doi: 10.1093/infdis/127.6.639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kryzhanovsky G. N. The mechanism of action of tetanus toxin: effect on synaptic processes and some particular features of toxin binding by the nervous tissue. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1973;276(3-4):247–270. doi: 10.1007/BF00499880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lichtenstein L. M., DeBernardo R. The immediate allergic response: in vitro action of cyclic AMP-active and other drugs on the two stages of histamine release. J Immunol. 1971 Oct;107(4):1131–1136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lichtenstein L. M., Henney C. S., Bourne H. R., Greenough W. B., 3rd Effects of cholera toxin on in vitro models of immediate and delayed hypersensitivity. Further evidence for the role of cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate. J Clin Invest. 1973 Mar;52(3):691–697. doi: 10.1172/JCI107230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lospalluto J. J., Finkelstein R. A. Chemical and physical properties of cholera exo-enterotoxin (choleragen) and its spontaneously formed toxoid (choleragenoid). Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972 Jan 26;257(1):158–166. doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(72)90265-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lönnroth I., Holmgren J. Subunit structure of cholera toxin. J Gen Microbiol. 1973 Jun;76(2):417–427. doi: 10.1099/00221287-76-2-417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Northrup R. S., Fauci A. S. Adjuvant effect of cholera enterotoxin on the immune response of the mouse to sheep red blood cells. J Infect Dis. 1972 Jun;125(6):672–673. doi: 10.1093/infdis/125.6.672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pierce N. F., Greenough W. B., 3rd, Carpenter C. C., Jr Vibrio cholerae enterotoxin and its mode of action. Bacteriol Rev. 1971 Mar;35(1):1–13. doi: 10.1128/br.35.1.1-13.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sharp G. W. Action of cholera toxin on fluid and electrolyte movement in the small intestine. Annu Rev Med. 1973;24:19–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.24.020173.000315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Strom T. B., Carpenter C. B., Garovoy M. R., Austen K. F., Merrill J. P., Kaliner M. The modulating influence of cyclic nucleotides upon lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity. J Exp Med. 1973 Aug 1;138(2):381–393. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.2.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sultzer B. M., Craig J. P. Cholera toxin inhibits macromolecular synthesis in mouse spleen cells. Nat New Biol. 1973 Aug 8;244(136):178–180. doi: 10.1038/newbio244178a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vaughan M., Pierce N. F., Greenough W. B., 3rd Stimulation of glycerol production in fat cells by cholera toxin. Nature. 1970 May 16;226(5246):658–659. doi: 10.1038/226658a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yahara I., Edelman G. M. Restriction of the mobility of lymphocyte immunoglobulin receptors by concanavalin A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Mar;69(3):608–612. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.3.608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES