Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1974 Oct 1;140(4):904–920. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.4.904

ISOLATION OF ANTIGEN-BINDING CELLS FROM UNPRIMED MICE

Demonstration of Antibody-Forming Cell Precursor Activity and Correlation between Precursor and Secreted Antibody Avidities

Michael H Julius 1, Leonard A Herzenberg 1
PMCID: PMC2139630  PMID: 4139227

Abstract

Cells binding DNP groups conjugated to fluoresceinated mouse gamma globulin (FDNP-MGG) were isolated from spleens of unprimed mice using a fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS). The isolated cells were specifically enriched at least 100-fold for anti-DNP precursor activity in an adoptive transfer assay as compared to unfractionated spleen. The fraction depleted of binding cells, although depleted of anti-DNP precursor activity, responded as well as unfractionated spleen when assayed for anticarrier (keyhole limpet hemocyanin [KLH]) precursor activity. High avidity binding cells were stained using low concentrations of FDNP-MGG. Medium and low avidity binding cells were stained using high concentrations of FDNP-MGG in the presence of free hapten which selectively blocked staining of the high avidity binding cells. Cells were supplemented with an excess of carrier-primed (KLH), nylon-purified splenic T cells and transferred to irradiated recipients. DNP-KLH was given at transfer and 5 days later. The anti-DNP plaque-forming cell (DNP-PFC) response and the avidities of the DNP-PFC in the irradiated recipients were measured by hapten inhibition of direct PFC plaque formation 12 days after transfer. At this time, very few indirect PFC were found. There was a positive correlation between the avidity of the DNP-binding cells and the avidity of the anti-DNP antibody secreted by their progeny. High avidity DNP-binding cells gave rise to predominantly high avidity anti-DNP-PFC. Medium and low avidity binding cells gave rise to medium and low avidity DNP-PFC.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ada G. L., Byrt P. Specific inactivation of antigen-reactive cells with 125I-labelled antigen. Nature. 1969 Jun 28;222(5200):1291–1292. doi: 10.1038/2221291a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersson B. Studies on antibody affinity at the cellular level. Correlation between binding properties of secreted antibody and cellular receptor for antigen on immunological memory cells. J Exp Med. 1972 Feb 1;135(2):312–322. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.2.312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersson B. Studies on the regulation of avidity at the level of the single antibody-forming cell. The effect of antigen dose and time after immunization. J Exp Med. 1970 Jul 1;132(1):77–88. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.1.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Avrameas S., Taudou B., Chuilon S. Glutaraldehyde, cyanuric chloride and tetrazotized O-dianisidine as coupling reagents in the passive hemagglutination test. Immunochemistry. 1969 Jan;6(1):67–76. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(69)90179-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BROWN G. C., AINSLIE J. D. Relationship between serum antibodies and subclinical infections with poliomyelitis virus. J Exp Med. 1951 Mar;93(3):197–205. doi: 10.1084/jem.93.3.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonner W. A., Hulett H. R., Sweet R. G., Herzenberg L. A. Fluorescence activated cell sorting. Rev Sci Instrum. 1972 Mar;43(3):404–409. doi: 10.1063/1.1685647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cebra J. J., Goldstein G. Chromatographic purification of tetramethylrhodamine-immune globulin conjugates and their use in the cellular localization of rabbit gamma-globulin polypeptide chains. J Immunol. 1965 Aug;95(2):230–245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheers C., Miller J. F. Cell-to-cell interaction in the immune response. IX. Regulation of hepten-specific antibody class by carrier priming. J Exp Med. 1972 Dec 1;136(6):1661–1665. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.6.1661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cunningham A. J., Sercarz E. E. The asynchronous development of immunological memory in helper (T) and precursor (B) cell lines. Eur J Immunol. 1971 Dec;1(6):413–421. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830010602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cunningham A. J., Szenberg A. Further improvements in the plaque technique for detecting single antibody-forming cells. Immunology. 1968 Apr;14(4):599–600. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. DULBECCO R., VOGT M. Plaque formation and isolation of pure lines with poliomyelitis viruses. J Exp Med. 1954 Feb;99(2):167–182. doi: 10.1084/jem.99.2.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Davie J. M., Paul W. E. Receptors on immunocompetent cells. IV. Direct measurement of avidity of cell receptors and cooperative binding of multivalent ligands. J Exp Med. 1972 Mar 1;135(3):643–659. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.3.643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Davie J. M., Rosenthal A. S., Paul W. E. Receptors on immunocompetent cells. 3. Specificity and nature of receptors on dinitrophenylated guinea pig albumin- 125 I-binding cells of immunized guinea pigs. J Exp Med. 1971 Aug 1;134(2):517–531. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.2.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. EAGLE H. Amino acid metabolism in mammalian cell cultures. Science. 1959 Aug 21;130(3373):432–437. doi: 10.1126/science.130.3373.432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. EISEN H. N., KARUSH F. The interaction of purified antibody with homologous hapten; antibody valence and binding constant. J Am Chem Soc. 1949 Jan;71(1):363–363. doi: 10.1021/ja01169a505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. EISEN H. N., SISKIND G. W. VARIATIONS IN AFFINITIES OF ANTIBODIES DURING THE IMMUNE RESPONSE. Biochemistry. 1964 Jul;3:996–1008. doi: 10.1021/bi00895a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Henry C., Kimura J., Wofsy L. Cell separation on affinity columns: the isolation of immunospecific precursor cells from unimmunized mice (lactoside hapten-lymphocyte receptors-immunology). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Jan;69(1):34–36. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.1.34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Inman J. K., Merchant B., Claflin L., Tacey S. E. Coupling of large haptens to proteins and cell surfaces: preparation of stable, optimally sensitized erythrocytes for hapten-specific, hemolytic plaque assays. Immunochemistry. 1973 Mar;10(3):165–174. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(73)90005-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Julius M. H., Masuda T., Herzenberg L. A. Demonstration that antigen-binding cells are precursors of antibody-producing cells after purification with a fluorescence-activated cell sorter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Jul;69(7):1934–1938. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.7.1934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Julius M. H., Simpson E., Herzenberg L. A. A rapid method for the isolation of functional thymus-derived murine lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1973 Oct;3(10):645–649. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830031011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Katz D. H., Paul W. E., Goidl E. A., Benacerraf B. Carrier function in anti-hapten immune responses. I. Enhancement of primary and secondary anti-hapten antibody responses by carrier preimmunization. J Exp Med. 1970 Aug 1;132(2):261–282. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.2.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. MCKINNEY R. M., SPILLANE J. T., PEARCE G. W. FACTORS AFFECTING THE RATE OF REACTION OF FLUORESCEIN ISOTHIOCYANATE WITH SERUM PROTEINS. J Immunol. 1964 Aug;93:232–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. North J. R., Askonas B. A. Analysis of affinity of monoclonal antibody responses by inhibition of plaque-forming cells. Eur J Immunol. 1974 May;4(5):361–366. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pasanen V. J., Mäkelä O. Effect of the number of haptens coupled to each erythrocyte on haemolytic plaque formation. Immunology. 1969 Mar;16(3):399–407. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rittenberg M. B., Pratt K. L. Antitrinitrophenyl (TNP) plaque assay. Primary response of Balb/c mice to soluble and particulate immunogen. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1969 Nov;132(2):575–581. doi: 10.3181/00379727-132-34264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rutishauser U., D'Eustachio P., Edelman G. M. Immunological functions of lymphocytes fractionated with antigen-derivatized fibers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Dec;70(12):3894–3898. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Siskind G. W., Benacerraf B. Cell selection by antigen in the immune response. Adv Immunol. 1969;10:1–50. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60414-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wigzell H., Mäkelä O. Separation of normal and immune lymphoid cells by antigen-coated coated columns. Antigen-binding characteristics of membrane antibodies as analyzed by hapten-protein antigens. J Exp Med. 1970 Jul 1;132(1):110–126. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.1.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wood B. T., Thompson S. H., Goldstein G. Fluorescent antibody staining. 3. Preparation of fluorescein-isothiocyanate-labeled antibodies. J Immunol. 1965 Aug;95(2):225–229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yamada H., Yamada A., Hollander V. P. 2,4-dinitrophenyl-hapten specific hemolytic plaque-in-gel formation by mouse myeloma (MOPC-315) cells. J Immunol. 1970 Jan;104(1):251–255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES