Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1974 May 1;139(5):1093–1109. doi: 10.1084/jem.139.5.1093

MECHANISMS OF GENETIC RESISTANCE TO FRIEND VIRUS LEUKEMIA IN MICE

I. ROLE OF89Sr-SENSITIVE EFFECTOR CELLS RESPONSIBLE FOR REJECTION OF BONE MARROW ALLOGRAFTS

Vinay Kumar 1, Michael Bennett 1, Robert J Eckner 1
PMCID: PMC2139650  PMID: 4596510

Abstract

Resistance to malignant erythropoiesis induced by Friend spleen focus-forming virus and resistance to marrow stem cell allografts are under genetic control. Strains of mice, e.g., C57BL/6 and B10.D2, which are homozygous for resistance at the Fv-2 locus, are also good rejectors of most bone marrow allografts. 89Sr, a bone-seeking isotope, irradiates marrow but not other lymphoid organs and abrogates resistance to marrow allografts without suppressing T- or B-cell functions. Thus, marrow-dependent effector cells (M cells) seem to resist allogeneic stem cells. To test if the genetic resistance to Friend virus (FV) is also mediated by M cells, B6 mice were treated with 89Sr using a dosage schedule known to abrogate resistance to allogeneic marrow cells. 9 days after FV infection of such mice, the spleens showed malignant erythroblastosis which could not be suppressed by prior hypertransfusion, a procedure which suppresses physiologic erythropoiesis. Such 89Sr-treated B6 mice also supported extensive virus replication, while control mice did not. FV markedly suppressed the ability of 89Sr-treated B6 mice to produce antisheep red blood cell (SRBC) antibodies, a feature seen normally only in genetically susceptible mice. Thus, 89Sr-treated B6 mice behaved in these respects as if they were susceptible to FV. When increasing doses of 89Sr were administered to B6 mice, a dose-related loss of resistance to FV was seen. Therefore, it appears that 89Sr-sensitive M cells mediate the genetic resistance to FV. The results of experiments with 89Sr indicated that genetically resistant mice would be expected to possess target cells which are susceptible to transformation by FV. To verify this corollary, bone marrow cells from B10.D2 (Fv-2rr) mice were transplanted into previously infected and lethally irradiated DBA/2 (Fv-2ss) recipients which share the same H-2d alleles. 5–15 days later, the spleens of DBA/2 primary recipients yielded transformed cells which were capable of producing splenic tumor colonies upon transplantation into adult, unirradiated B10.D2 secondary recipients. Various control experiments clearly indicated that the tumor colonies so induced were of B10.D2 marrow origin. This indicated that B10.D2 stem cells could be transformed when allowed to interact with FV in the spleens of susceptible DBA/2 mice. However, 30 days after transplantation of B10.D2 bone marrow cells into DBA/2 recipients, no transformed cells were detected. Apparently, in the 30-day interval precursors in the B10.D2 marrow gave rise to mature M cells which resisted the leukemic process. Since M cells recognize hybrid or hemopoietic histocompatability antigens expressed on primitive normal and transformed hematopoietic cells, we suggest that M cells may exert surveillance by rejecting leukemic cells. Thus, marrow transplantation from genetically resistant donors may provide a new mode of treatment for leukemia, by providing precursors of M cells and other immunocompetent cell types.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AXELRAD A. A., STEEVES R. A. ASSAY FOR FRIEND LEUKEMIA VIRUS: RAPID QUANTITATIVE METHOD BASED ON ENUMERATION OF MACROSCOPIC SPLEEN FOCI IN MICE. Virology. 1964 Nov;24:513–518. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(64)90199-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Axelrad A. Genetic and cellular basis of susceptibility or resistance to Friend leukemia virus infection in mice. Proc Can Cancer Conf. 1969;8:313–343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett M. Graft-versus-host reactions in mice. I. Kinetic and immunogenetic studies of alloantigen-sensitive units of lymphoid tissue. Transplantation. 1971 Feb;11(2):158–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett M. Prevention of marrow allograft rejection with radioactive strontium: evidence for marrow-dependent effector cells. J Immunol. 1973 Feb;110(2):510–516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennett M., Steeves R. A. Immunocompetent cell functions in mice infected with Friend leukemia virus. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1970 May;44(5):1107–1119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ceglowski W. S., Friedman H. Murine virus leukaemogenesis: relationship between susceptibility and immunodepression. Nature. 1969 Dec 27;224(5226):1318–1319. doi: 10.1038/2241318a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cudkowicz G., Bennett M. Peculiar immunobiology of bone marrow allografts. I. Graft rejection by irradiated responder mice. J Exp Med. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):83–102. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cudkowicz G. Genetic control of bone marrow graft rejection. I. Determinant-specific difference of reactivity in two pairs of inbred mouse strains. J Exp Med. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):281–293. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eckner R. J. Helper-dependent properties of Friend spleen focus-forming virus: effect of the Fv-1 gene on the late stages in virus synthesis. J Virol. 1973 Sep;12(3):523–533. doi: 10.1128/jvi.12.3.523-533.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eckner R. J., Steeves R. A. A classification of the murine leukemia viruses. Neutralization of pseudotypes of Friend spleen focus-forming virus by type-specific murine antisera. J Exp Med. 1972 Oct 1;136(4):832–850. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.4.832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fried W., Gurney C. W., Swatek M. The effect of strontium-89 on the stem cell compartment of the spleen. Radiat Res. 1966 Sep;29(1):50–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. GROSS L. "Spontaneous" leukemia developing in C3H mice following inoculation in infancy, with AK-leukemic extracts, or AK-embrvos. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1951 Jan;76(1):27–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lilly F. Fv-2: identification and location of a second gene governing the spleen focus response to Friend leukemia virus in mice. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1970 Jul;45(1):163–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mirand E. A., Steeves R. A., Avila L., Grace J. T., Jr Spleen focus formation by polycythemic strains of Friend leukemia virus. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1968 Mar;127(3):900–904. doi: 10.3181/00379727-127-32831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mirand E. A. Virus-induced erythropoiesis in hypertransfused-polycythemic mice. Science. 1967 May 12;156(3776):832–833. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3776.832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Odaka T., Matsukura M. Inheritance of Susceptibility to Friend Mouse Leukemia Virus: VI. Reciprocal Alteration of Innate Resistance or Susceptibility by Bone Marrow Transplantation Between Congenic Strains. J Virol. 1969 Dec;4(6):837–843. doi: 10.1128/jvi.4.6.837-843.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pincus T., Rowe W. P., Lilly F. A major genetic locus affecting resistance to infection with murine leukemia viruses. II. Apparent identity to a major locus described for resistance to friend murine leukemia virus. J Exp Med. 1971 Jun 1;133(6):1234–1241. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.6.1234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rossi G. B., Cudkowicz G., Friend C. Transformation of spleen cells three hours after infection in vivo with Friend leukemia virus. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1973 Jan;50(1):249–254. doi: 10.1093/jnci/50.1.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Steeves R. A., Eckner R. J., Bennett M., Mirand E. A., Trudel P. J. Isolation and characterization of a lymphatic leukemia virus in the Friend virus complex. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1971 Jun;46(6):1209–1217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stutman O., Dupuy J. M. Resistance to Friend leukemia virus in mice: effect of immunosuppression. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1972 Nov;49(5):1283–1293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES