Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1974 May 1;139(5):1189–1203. doi: 10.1084/jem.139.5.1189

THE ROUTE OF ENTERIC INFECTION IN NORMAL MICE

Philip B Carter 1, Frank M Collins 1
PMCID: PMC2139651  PMID: 4596512

Abstract

This study followed the early pathogenesis of orally induced murine typhoid fever. Intragastrically administered Salmonella enteritidis moves quickly through the normal undisturbed gut so that only a small residuum remains in the cecum and large intestine after the first few hours. Dye injection of the gut wall was used to show that lymph from discrete portions of the gastrointestinal tract drains to separate lymph nodes, probably via the regional Peyer's patches. Plating techniques capable of detecting a single colony-forming unit of S. enteritidis within the different Peyer's patches and draining lymph nodes indicate that, although the cecum and large intestine are exposed to large numbers of Salmonella for longer time periods than the small intestine, the primary site of bacterial penetration involves the distal ileum. This area of the small intestine as well as the cecum are both drained by the distal mesenteric lymph nodes, and were the only nodes which contained detectable numbers of viable Salmonella over the first 24 h of infection. Neither the pyloric nor the proximal mesenteric lymph nodes (which drain the stomach and duodenum) nor the pancreatic and caudal lymph nodes (which drain the transverse and descending colon) contained viable Salmonella. Salmonella were observed to infect the ileal mucosa and its Peyer's patches. With time, this infection progresses to the draining lymph node and ultimately reaches the liver and spleen. Some of the implications of these findings relative to the development of acquired resistance to enteric disease are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (781.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carter P. B., Pollard M. Host responses to "normal" microbial flora in germ-free mice. J Reticuloendothel Soc. 1971 Jun;9(6):580–587. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Collins F. M., Carter P. B. Comparative immunogenicity of heat-killed and living oral Salmonella vaccines. Infect Immun. 1972 Oct;6(4):451–458. doi: 10.1128/iai.6.4.451-458.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Collins F. M. Immunity to enteric infection in mice. Infect Immun. 1970 Mar;1(3):243–250. doi: 10.1128/iai.1.3.243-250.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Collins F. M. Salmonellosis in orally infected specific pathogen-free C57B1 mice. Infect Immun. 1972 Feb;5(2):191–198. doi: 10.1128/iai.5.2.191-198.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DUNN T. B. Normal and pathologic anatomy of the reticular tissue in laboratory mice, with a classification and discussion of neoplasms. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1954 Jun;14(6):1281–1433. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GERICHTER C. B. The dissemination of Salmonella typhi, S. paratyphi A and S. paratyphi B through the organs of the white mouse by oral infection. J Hyg (Lond) 1960 Sep;58:307–319. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400038420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HUDSON J. A., LUCKEY T. D. BACTERIA INDUCED MORPHOLOGIC CHANGES. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1964 Jul;116:628–631. doi: 10.3181/00379727-116-29324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hudack S., McMaster P. D. I. THE PERMEABILITY OF THE WALL OF THE LYMPHATIC CAPILLARY. J Exp Med. 1932 Jul 31;56(2):223–238. doi: 10.1084/jem.56.2.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MILLER C. P., BOHNHOFF M. CHANGES IN THE MOUSE'S ENTERIC MICROFLORA ASSOCIATED WITH ENHANCED SUSCEPTIBILITY TO SALMONELLA INFECTION FOLLOWING STREPTOMYCIN TREATMENT. J Infect Dis. 1963 Jul-Aug;113:59–66. doi: 10.1093/infdis/113.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miyakawa M., Sumi Y., Sakurai K., Ukai M., Hirabayashi N. Serum gamma-globulin and lymphoid tissue in the germfree rats. Nihon Ketsueki Gakkai Zasshi. 1969 Aug;32(4):501–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ruitenberg E. J., Guinée P. A., Kruyt B. C., Berkvens J. M. Salmonella pathogenesis in germ-free mice. A bacteriological and histological study. Br J Exp Pathol. 1971 Apr;52(2):192–197. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Smith F., Rous P. THE GRADIENT OF VASCULAR PERMEABILITY : IV. THE PERMEABILITY OF THE CUTANEOUS VENULES AND ITS FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE. J Exp Med. 1931 Sep 30;54(4):499–514. doi: 10.1084/jem.54.4.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sprinz H., Gangarosa E. J., Williams M., Hornick R. B., Woodward T. E. Histopathology of the upper small intestines in typhoid fever. Biopsy study of experimental disease in man. Am J Dig Dis. 1966 Aug;11(8):615–624. doi: 10.1007/BF02233509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Takeuchi A. Electron microscope studies of experimental Salmonella infection. I. Penetration into the intestinal epithelium by Salmonella typhimurium. Am J Pathol. 1967 Jan;50(1):109–136. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Volkheimer G., Schulz F. H. The phenomenon of persorption. Digestion. 1968;1(4):213–218. doi: 10.1159/000196856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES