Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1974 May 1;139(5):1037–1048. doi: 10.1084/jem.139.5.1037

STIMULATED LYMPHOCYTE CULTURES

RESPONDER RECRUITMENT AND CELL CYCLE KINETICS

Hans-Peter Lohrmann 1, Carole M Graw 1, Robert G Graw Jr 1
PMCID: PMC2139670  PMID: 4825240

Abstract

Lymphocytes, stimulated with different doses of plant mitogens or allogeneic cells, incorporate varying amounts of [3H]thymidine. Theoretically, this may be due to different numbers of responding cells, to earlier proliferative response of these cells, and/or to their more or less rapid transit through the cell cycle. Dog peripheral blood lymphocytes were stimulated in vitro with different doses of phytohemagglutinin (PHA), or with allogeneic lymphocytes. After their synchronization by incubation with hydroxyurea (4 mM), the mean durations of the cell cycle, and of the different cell cycle phases were constant and unrelated to strength or type of stimulation. PHA-stimulated lymphocyte cultures were maintained in the presence of colchicine, to prevent clonal proliferation of responding lymphocytes. DNA uptake in this setting, attributed to first generation responders, was related to the strength of proliferative lymphocyte response in control cultures without colchicine. Furthermore, cell proliferation occurred earlier with greater stimulation. It is concluded that higher [3H]thymidine uptake in vitro by stimulated lymphocytes is due to greater numbers of responding cells, which are triggered into proliferative response earlier, and not to a more rapid transit of the responding cells through the cell cycle.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (677.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albertini R. J., Bach F. H. Quantitative assay of antigenic disparity at hl-a-the major histocompatibility locus in man. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):639–651. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BENDER M. A., PRESCOTT D. M. DNA synthesis and mitosis in cultures of human peripheral leukocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1962 Aug;27:221–229. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(62)90225-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bach F. H., Bock H., Graupner K., Day E., Klostermann H. Cell kinetic studies in mixed leukocyte cultures: an in vitro model of homograft reactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Feb;62(2):377–384. doi: 10.1073/pnas.62.2.377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. COOPER E. H., BARKHAN P., HALE A. J. Observations on the proliferation of human leucocytes cultured with phytohaemagglutinin. Br J Haematol. 1963 Jan;9:101–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1963.tb05446.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Daguillard F. Immunologic significance of in vitro lymphocyte responses. Med Clin North Am. 1972 Mar;56(2):293–303. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)32397-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FRY R. J., LESHER S., KOHN H. I. A method for determining mitotic time. Exp Cell Res. 1961 Nov;25:469–471. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90299-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gordon J. The mixed leukocyte culture reaction. Med Clin North Am. 1972 Mar;56(2):337–351. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)32400-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HENRY J. L., MEYER J., WEINMANN J. P., SCHOUR I. Pattern of mitotic activity in oral epithelium of rabbits. AMA Arch Pathol. 1952 Sep;54(3):281–297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jones G. The number of reactive cells in mouse lymphocyte cultures stimulated by phytohemagglutinin, concanavalin A or histocompatibility antigen. J Immunol. 1973 Sep;111(3):914–920. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ling N. R., Holt P. J. The activation and reactivation of peripheral lymphocytes in culture. J Cell Sci. 1967 Mar;2(1):57–70. doi: 10.1242/jcs.2.1.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Marshall W. H., Valentine F. T., Lawrence H. S. Cellular immunity in vitro. Clonal proliferation of antigen-stimulated lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1969 Aug 1;130(2):327–343. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.2.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pfeiffer S. E., Tolmach L. J. Inhibition of DNA synthesis in HeLa cells by hydroxyurea. Cancer Res. 1967 Jan;27(1):124–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. REISKIN A. B., MENDELSOHN M. L. A COMPARISON OF THE CELL CYCLE IN INDUCED CARCINOMAS AND THEIR NORMAL COUNTERPART. Cancer Res. 1964 Aug;24:1131–1136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SWIFT H. H. The desoxyribose nucleic acid content of animal nuclei. Physiol Zool. 1950 Jul;23(3):169–198. doi: 10.1086/physzool.23.3.30152074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sasaki M. S., Norman A. Proliferation of human lymphocytes in culture. Nature. 1966 May 28;210(5039):913–914. doi: 10.1038/210913a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sinclair W. K. Hydroxyurea: differential lethal effects on cultured mammalian cells during the cell cycle. Science. 1965 Dec 24;150(3704):1729–1731. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3704.1729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sorensen S. F., Kissmeyer-Nielsen F. Studies on the quantitation of the lymphocyte response in vitro. A family study. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1969;77(1):117–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1969.tb04213.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. WIDNER W. R., STORER J. B., LUSHBAUGH C. C. The use of x-ray and nitrogen mustard to determine the mitotic and intermitotic times in normal and malignant rat tissues. Cancer Res. 1951 Nov;11(11):877–884. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Weber W. T. Mixed lymphocyte interaction and PHA-response of chicken spleen cells in a chemically defined medium. J Reticuloendothel Soc. 1970 Jul;8(1):37–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wilson D. B., Blyth JL NOWELL P. C. Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. 3. Kinetics of the response. J Exp Med. 1968 Nov 1;128(5):1157–1181. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.5.1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wilson D. B., Nowell P. C. Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. IV. Immunologic potentiality of the responding cells. J Exp Med. 1970 Feb;131(2):391–407. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.2.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. YOUNG C. W., HODAS S. HYDROXYUREA: INHIBITORY EFFECT ON DNA METABOLISM. Science. 1964 Nov 27;146(3648):1172–1174. doi: 10.1126/science.146.3648.1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES