Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1992 Sep;1(9):1185–1205. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560010912

Molecular dynamics studies of a DNA-binding protein: 2. An evaluation of implicit and explicit solvent models for the molecular dynamics simulation of the Escherichia coli trp repressor.

J Guenot 1, P A Kollman 1
PMCID: PMC2142173  PMID: 1304396

Abstract

Although aqueous simulations with periodic boundary conditions more accurately describe protein dynamics than in vacuo simulations, these are computationally intensive for most proteins. Trp repressor dynamic simulations with a small water shell surrounding the starting model yield protein trajectories that are markedly improved over gas phase, yet computationally efficient. Explicit water in molecular dynamics simulations maintains surface exposure of protein hydrophilic atoms and burial of hydrophobic atoms by opposing the otherwise asymmetric protein-protein forces. This properly orients protein surface side chains, reduces protein fluctuations, and lowers the overall root mean square deviation from the crystal structure. For simulations with crystallographic waters only, a linear or sigmoidal distance-dependent dielectric yields a much better trajectory than does a constant dielectric model. As more water is added to the starting model, the differences between using distance-dependent and constant dielectric models becomes smaller, although the linear distance-dependent dielectric yields an average structure closer to the crystal structure than does a constant dielectric model. Multiplicative constants greater than one, for the linear distance-dependent dielectric simulations, produced trajectories that are progressively worse in describing trp repressor dynamics. Simulations of bovine pancreatic trypsin were used to ensure that the trp repressor results were not protein dependent and to explore the effect of the nonbonded cutoff on the distance-dependent and constant dielectric simulation models. The nonbonded cutoff markedly affected the constant but not distance-dependent dielectric bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor simulations. As with trp repressor, the distance-dependent dielectric model with a shell of water surrounding the protein produced a trajectory in better agreement with the crystal structure than a constant dielectric model, and the physical properties of the trajectory average structure, both with and without a nonbonded cutoff, were comparable.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aqvist J., van Gunsteren W. F., Leijonmarck M., Tapia O. A molecular dynamics study of the C-terminal fragment of the L7/L12 ribosomal protein. Secondary structure motion in a 150 picosecond trajectory. J Mol Biol. 1985 Jun 5;183(3):461–477. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90014-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernstein F. C., Koetzle T. F., Williams G. J., Meyer E. F., Jr, Brice M. D., Rodgers J. R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol. 1977 May 25;112(3):535–542. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown K. D. Regulation of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis Escherichia coli K12. Genetics. 1968 Sep;60(1):31–48. doi: 10.1093/genetics/60.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chiche L., Gaboriaud C., Heitz A., Mornon J. P., Castro B., Kollman P. A. Use of restrained molecular dynamics in water to determine three-dimensional protein structure: prediction of the three-dimensional structure of Ecballium elaterium trypsin inhibitor II. Proteins. 1989;6(4):405–417. doi: 10.1002/prot.340060407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chiche L., Gregoret L. M., Cohen F. E., Kollman P. A. Protein model structure evaluation using the solvation free energy of folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Apr;87(8):3240–3243. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.8.3240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Daggett V., Kollman P. A., Kuntz I. D. Molecular dynamics simulations of small peptides: dependence on dielectric model and pH. Biopolymers. 1991 Feb 15;31(3):285–304. doi: 10.1002/bip.360310304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dauber-Osguthorpe P., Roberts V. A., Osguthorpe D. J., Wolff J., Genest M., Hagler A. T. Structure and energetics of ligand binding to proteins: Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase-trimethoprim, a drug-receptor system. Proteins. 1988;4(1):31–47. doi: 10.1002/prot.340040106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eisenberg D., McLachlan A. D. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature. 1986 Jan 16;319(6050):199–203. doi: 10.1038/319199a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gunsalus R. P., Yanofsky C. Nucleotide sequence and expression of Escherichia coli trpR, the structural gene for the trp aporepressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Dec;77(12):7117–7121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.12.7117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harvey S. C. Treatment of electrostatic effects in macromolecular modeling. Proteins. 1989;5(1):78–92. doi: 10.1002/prot.340050109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Howard A. E., Kollman P. A. Molecular dynamics studies of a DNA-binding protein: 1. A comparison of the trp repressor and trp aporepressor aqueous simulations. Protein Sci. 1992 Sep;1(9):1173–1184. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560010911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lawson C. L., Sigler P. B. The structure of trp pseudorepressor at 1.65A shows why indole propionate acts as a trp 'inducer'. Nature. 1988 Jun 30;333(6176):869–871. doi: 10.1038/333869a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lawson C. L., Zhang R. G., Schevitz R. W., Otwinowski Z., Joachimiak A., Sigler P. B. Flexibility of the DNA-binding domains of trp repressor. Proteins. 1988;3(1):18–31. doi: 10.1002/prot.340030103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Levitt M., Sharon R. Accurate simulation of protein dynamics in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Oct;85(20):7557–7561. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.20.7557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Marmorstein R. Q., Joachimiak A., Sprinzl M., Sigler P. B. The structural basis for the interaction between L-tryptophan and the Escherichia coli trp aporepressor. J Biol Chem. 1987 Apr 5;262(10):4922–4927. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Marmorstein R. Q., Sigler P. B. Stereochemical effects of L-tryptophan and its analogues on trp repressor's affinity for operator-DNA. J Biol Chem. 1989 Jun 5;264(16):9149–9154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Morse D. E., Yanofsky C. Amber mutants of the trpR regulatory gene. J Mol Biol. 1969 Aug 28;44(1):185–193. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90413-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ornstein R. L. Using molecular dynamics simulations on crambin to evaluate the suitability of different continuum dielectric and hydrogen atom models for protein simulations. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1990 Apr;7(5):1019–1041. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1990.10508543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Otwinowski Z., Schevitz R. W., Zhang R. G., Lawson C. L., Joachimiak A., Marmorstein R. Q., Luisi B. F., Sigler P. B. Crystal structure of trp repressor/operator complex at atomic resolution. Nature. 1988 Sep 22;335(6188):321–329. doi: 10.1038/335321a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pickersgill R. W. A rapid method of calculating charge-charge interaction energies in proteins. Protein Eng. 1988 Sep;2(3):247–248. doi: 10.1093/protein/2.3.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pittard J., Camakaris J., Wallace B. J. Inhibition of 3-deoxy-d-arabinoheptulosonic acid-7-phosphate synthetase (trp) in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1969 Mar;97(3):1242–1247. doi: 10.1128/jb.97.3.1242-1247.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rose J. K., Squires C. L., Yanofsky C., Yang H. L., Zubay G. Regulation of in vitro transcription of the tryptophan operon by purified RNA polymerase in the presence of partially purified repressor and tryptophan. Nat New Biol. 1973 Oct 3;245(144):133–137. doi: 10.1038/newbio245133a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rose J. K., Yanofsky C. Interaction of the operator of the tryptophan operon with repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Aug;71(8):3134–3138. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.8.3134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schevitz R. W., Otwinowski Z., Joachimiak A., Lawson C. L., Sigler P. B. The three-dimensional structure of trp repressor. 1985 Oct 31-Nov 6Nature. 317(6040):782–786. doi: 10.1038/317782a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sharp K. A., Honig B. Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: theory and applications. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1990;19:301–332. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.19.060190.001505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shimizu Y., Shimizu N., Hayashi M. In vitro repression of transcription of the tryptophan operon by trp repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Jul;70(7):1990–1994. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.7.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Singh U. C., Weiner S. J., Kollman P. Molecular dynamics simulations of d(C-G-C-G-A) X d(T-C-G-C-G) with and without "hydrated" counterions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Feb;82(3):755–759. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.3.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wendoloski J. J., Matthew J. B. Molecular dynamics effects on protein electrostatics. Proteins. 1989;5(4):313–321. doi: 10.1002/prot.340050407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wlodawer A., Deisenhofer J., Huber R. Comparison of two highly refined structures of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. J Mol Biol. 1987 Jan 5;193(1):145–156. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90633-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yanofsky C. Tryptophan biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Genetic determination of the proteins involved. JAMA. 1971 Nov 15;218(7):1026–1035. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang R. G., Joachimiak A., Lawson C. L., Schevitz R. W., Otwinowski Z., Sigler P. B. The crystal structure of trp aporepressor at 1.8 A shows how binding tryptophan enhances DNA affinity. Nature. 1987 Jun 18;327(6123):591–597. doi: 10.1038/327591a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES