Skip to main content
PMC home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1993 Jan;2(1):55–70. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560020106

Modeling alpha-helical transmembrane domains: the calculation and use of substitution tables for lipid-facing residues.

D Donnelly 1, J P Overington 1, S V Ruffle 1, J H Nugent 1, T L Blundell 1
PMCID: PMC2142307  PMID: 8443590

Abstract

Amino acid substitution tables are calculated for residues in membrane proteins where the side chain is accessible to the lipid. The analysis is based upon the knowledge of the three-dimensional structures of two homologous bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers and alignments of their sequences with the sequences of related proteins. The patterns of residue substitutions show that the lipid-accessible residues are less conserved and have distinctly different substitution patterns from the inaccessible residues in water-soluble proteins. The observed substitutions obtained from sequence alignments of transmembrane regions (identified from, e.g., hydrophobicity analysis) can be compared with the patterns derived from the substitution tables to predict the accessibility of residues to the lipid. A Fourier transform method, similar to that used for the calculation of a hydrophobic moment, is used to detect periodicity in the predicted accessibility that is compatible with the presence of an alpha-helix. If the putative transmembrane region is identified as helical, then the buried and exposed faces can be discriminated. The presence of charged residues on the lipid-exposed face can help to identify the regions that are in contact with the polar environment on the borders of the bilayer, and the construction of a meaningful three-dimensional model is then possible. This method is tested on an alignment of bacteriorhodopsin and two related sequences for which there are structural data at near atomic resolution.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen J. P., Feher G., Yeates T. O., Komiya H., Rees D. C. Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26: protein-cofactor (quinones and Fe2+) interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(22):8487–8491. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.22.8487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen J. P., Feher G., Yeates T. O., Komiya H., Rees D. C. Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26: the cofactors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(16):5730–5734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.16.5730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen J. P., Feher G., Yeates T. O., Komiya H., Rees D. C. Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26: the protein subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(17):6162–6166. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.17.6162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernstein F. C., Koetzle T. F., Williams G. J., Meyer E. F., Jr, Brice M. D., Rodgers J. R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol. 1977 May 25;112(3):535–542. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bowie J. U., Reidhaar-Olson J. F., Lim W. A., Sauer R. T. Deciphering the message in protein sequences: tolerance to amino acid substitutions. Science. 1990 Mar 16;247(4948):1306–1310. doi: 10.1126/science.2315699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang C. H., Tiede D., Tang J., Smith U., Norris J., Schiffer M. Structure of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides R-26 reaction center. FEBS Lett. 1986 Sep 1;205(1):82–86. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(86)80870-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chothia C., Lesk A. M. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J. 1986 Apr;5(4):823–826. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04288.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Donnelly D., Johnson M. S., Blundell T. L., Saunders J. An analysis of the periodicity of conserved residues in sequence alignments of G-protein coupled receptors. Implications for the three-dimensional structure. FEBS Lett. 1989 Jul 17;251(1-2):109–116. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(89)81438-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eisenberg D., Weiss R. M., Terwilliger T. C. The hydrophobic moment detects periodicity in protein hydrophobicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jan;81(1):140–144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.1.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Engelman D. M., Henderson R., McLachlan A. D., Wallace B. A. Path of the polypeptide in bacteriorhodopsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Apr;77(4):2023–2027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.4.2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Engelman D. M., Steitz T. A., Goldman A. Identifying nonpolar transbilayer helices in amino acid sequences of membrane proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1986;15:321–353. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.15.060186.001541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hubbard T. J., Blundell T. L. Comparison of solvent-inaccessible cores of homologous proteins: definitions useful for protein modelling. Protein Eng. 1987 Jun;1(3):159–171. doi: 10.1093/protein/1.3.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jennings M. L. Topography of membrane proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1989;58:999–1027. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.58.070189.005031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Komiya H., Yeates T. O., Rees D. C., Allen J. P., Feher G. Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26 and 2.4.1: symmetry relations and sequence comparisons between different species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(23):9012–9016. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.23.9012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kühlbrandt W., Wang D. N. Three-dimensional structure of plant light-harvesting complex determined by electron crystallography. Nature. 1991 Mar 14;350(6314):130–134. doi: 10.1038/350130a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee B., Richards F. M. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol. 1971 Feb 14;55(3):379–400. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rees D. C., DeAntonio L., Eisenberg D. Hydrophobic organization of membrane proteins. Science. 1989 Aug 4;245(4917):510–513. doi: 10.1126/science.2667138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rees D. C., Komiya H., Yeates T. O., Allen J. P., Feher G. The bacterial photosynthetic reaction center as a model for membrane proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1989;58:607–633. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.58.070189.003135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sali A., Blundell T. L. Definition of general topological equivalence in protein structures. A procedure involving comparison of properties and relationships through simulated annealing and dynamic programming. J Mol Biol. 1990 Mar 20;212(2):403–428. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90134-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith E. L. The evolution of proteins. Harvey Lect. 1966;62:231–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wallace B. A. Gramicidin channels and pores. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1990;19:127–157. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.19.060190.001015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Weiss M. S., Kreusch A., Schiltz E., Nestel U., Welte W., Weckesser J., Schulz G. E. The structure of porin from Rhodobacter capsulatus at 1.8 A resolution. FEBS Lett. 1991 Mar 25;280(2):379–382. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80336-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yeates T. O., Komiya H., Rees D. C., Allen J. P., Feher G. Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26: membrane-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(18):6438–6442. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.18.6438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES