Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1993 Dec;2(12):2233–2245. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560021223

Dynamics of interaction of RNA polymerase II with nucleosomes. I. Effect of salts.

P Bhargava 1
PMCID: PMC2142318  PMID: 8298467

Abstract

Mononucleosomes were labeled with the sulfhydryl-specific fluorescence probe 1,5-IAEDANS (5-(2-((iodoacetyl)amino)ethyl)amino-naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid) by attaching the dye to the single cysteine of H3 through a covalent linkage. The enzyme RNA polymerase II (pol II) utilized the native and the reconstituted fluorescent nucleosomes as templates with greatest efficiency when 0.2 M potassium acetate (AcOK) was used as the supporting salt; 0.2 M NaCl was found to be very much inhibitory. Measurement of polarity of the microenvironment of the dye at its binding site in the nucleosome showed the conformation to be more open in the presence of AcOK, compared to that in 0.1 or 0.2 M NaCl. The binding of pol II to the nucleosome resulted in a relatively more compact structure when measured in terms of the polarity of the microenvironment of the dye in various salt-dependent conformations of the nucleosomes. Time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy showed that the probe molecule at its binding site undergoes certain excited-state processes, and the presence/absence or rate of these excited-state processes depends on the conformation of nucleosomes, which in turn depends on the type and concentration of the ion present in the medium. Time-resolved emission spectra showed that binding of nucleosomes by pol II established some new contacts that resulted in inaccessibility of the dye to the bulk solvent, reflecting a more hydrophobic environment for the dye in the steady-state spectra. Thus, binding or transcription of nucleosomes by pol II did not break open their structure. Rather, some transient internal adjustments within the histone octamer may take place to accommodate the bulky pol II molecule.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arents G., Burlingame R. W., Wang B. C., Love W. E., Moudrianakis E. N. The nucleosomal core histone octamer at 3.1 A resolution: a tripartite protein assembly and a left-handed superhelix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 15;88(22):10148–10152. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.22.10148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ausio J., Seger D., Eisenberg H. Nucleosome core particle stability and conformational change. Effect of temperature, particle and NaCl concentrations, and crosslinking of histone H3 sulfhydryl groups. J Mol Biol. 1984 Jun 15;176(1):77–104. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90383-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baer B. W., Rhodes D. Eukaryotic RNA polymerase II binds to nucleosome cores from transcribed genes. Nature. 1983 Feb 10;301(5900):482–488. doi: 10.1038/301482a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhargava P., Chatterji D. DNA bound RNA polymerase activity of the yeast nuclei. Biochem Int. 1987 Oct;15(4):853–861. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhargava P., Chatterji D. Spectroscopic studies on the mode of binding of ATP, UTP and alpha-amanitin with yeast RNA polymerase II. FEBS Lett. 1988 Dec 5;241(1-2):33–37. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(88)81025-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhargava P. Dynamics of interaction of RNA polymerase II with nucleosomes. II. During read-through and elongation. Protein Sci. 1993 Dec;2(12):2246–2258. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560021224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brand L., Gohlke J. R. Fluorescence probes for structure. Annu Rev Biochem. 1972;41:843–868. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.41.070172.004211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burlingame R. W., Love W. E., Wang B. C., Hamlin R., Nguyen H. X., Moudrianakis E. N. Crystallographic structure of the octameric histone core of the nucleosome at a resolution of 3.3 A. Science. 1985 May 3;228(4699):546–553. doi: 10.1126/science.3983639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Clark D. J., Felsenfeld G. Formation of nucleosomes on positively supercoiled DNA. EMBO J. 1991 Feb;10(2):387–395. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07960.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Daban J. R., Cantor C. R. Role of histone pairs H2A,H2B and H3,H4 in the self-assembly of nucleosome core particles. J Mol Biol. 1982 Apr 25;156(4):771–789. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90141-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Daban J. R., Cantor C. R. Use of fluorescent probes to study nucleosomes. Methods Enzymol. 1989;170:192–214. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(89)70048-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dieterich A. E., Axel R., Cantor C. R. Dynamics of nucleosome structure studied by fluorescence. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1978;42(Pt 1):199–206. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1978.042.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Eshaghpour H., Dieterich A. E., Cantor C. R., Crothers D. M. Singlet-singlet energy transfer studies of the internal organization of nucleosomes. Biochemistry. 1980 Apr 29;19(9):1797–1805. doi: 10.1021/bi00550a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Felsenfeld G. Chromatin as an essential part of the transcriptional mechanism. Nature. 1992 Jan 16;355(6357):219–224. doi: 10.1038/355219a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gafni A., DeToma R. P., Manrow R. E., Brand L. Nanosecond decay studies of a fluorescence probe bound to apomyoglobin. Biophys J. 1977 Feb;17(2):155–168. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(77)85633-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grunstein M. Histone function in transcription. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1990;6:643–678. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.06.110190.003235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grunstein M. Nucleosomes: regulators of transcription. Trends Genet. 1990 Dec;6(12):395–400. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90299-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hudson E. N., Weber G. Synthesis and characterization of two fluorescent sulfhydryl reagents. Biochemistry. 1973 Oct 9;12(21):4154–4161. doi: 10.1021/bi00745a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jones D. P., McConkey D. J., Nicotera P., Orrenius S. Calcium-activated DNA fragmentation in rat liver nuclei. J Biol Chem. 1989 Apr 15;264(11):6398–6403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kornberg R. D., Lorch Y. Irresistible force meets immovable object: transcription and the nucleosome. Cell. 1991 Nov 29;67(5):833–836. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90354-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Laybourn P. J., Kadonaga J. T. Role of nucleosomal cores and histone H1 in regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Science. 1991 Oct 11;254(5029):238–245. doi: 10.1126/science.254.5029.238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee M. S., Garrard W. T. Transcription-induced nucleosome 'splitting': an underlying structure for DNase I sensitive chromatin. EMBO J. 1991 Mar;10(3):607–615. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07988.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Leirmo S., Harrison C., Cayley D. S., Burgess R. R., Record M. T., Jr Replacement of potassium chloride by potassium glutamate dramatically enhances protein-DNA interactions in vitro. Biochemistry. 1987 Apr 21;26(8):2095–2101. doi: 10.1021/bi00382a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Libertini L. J., Small E. W. Effects of pH on low-salt transition of chromatin core particles. Biochemistry. 1982 Jul 6;21(14):3327–3334. doi: 10.1021/bi00257a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lorch Y., LaPointe J. W., Kornberg R. D. On the displacement of histones from DNA by transcription. Cell. 1988 Dec 2;55(5):743–744. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90128-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lue N. F., Kornberg R. D. Accurate initiation at RNA polymerase II promoters in extracts from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Dec;84(24):8839–8843. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.24.8839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lutter L. C. Kinetic analysis of deoxyribonuclease I cleavages in the nucleosome core: evidence for a DNA superhelix. J Mol Biol. 1978 Sep 15;124(2):391–420. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90306-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Stein A., Bina M. A model chromatin assembly system. Factors affecting nucleosome spacing. J Mol Biol. 1984 Sep 15;178(2):341–363. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90148-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Thoma F. Structural changes in nucleosomes during transcription: strip, split or flip? Trends Genet. 1991 Jun;7(6):175–177. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(91)90429-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Turner D. C., Brand L. Quantitative estimation of protein binding site polarity. Fluorescence of N-arylaminonaphthalenesulfonates. Biochemistry. 1968 Oct;7(10):3381–3390. doi: 10.1021/bi00850a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Workman J. L., Taylor I. C., Kingston R. E. Activation domains of stably bound GAL4 derivatives alleviate repression of promoters by nucleosomes. Cell. 1991 Feb 8;64(3):533–544. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90237-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yager T. D., McMurray C. T., van Holde K. E. Salt-induced release of DNA from nucleosome core particles. Biochemistry. 1989 Mar 7;28(5):2271–2281. doi: 10.1021/bi00431a045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yager T. D., van Holde K. E. Dynamics and equilibria of nucleosomes at elevated ionic strength. J Biol Chem. 1984 Apr 10;259(7):4212–4222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES