Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1942 Jul 20;25(6):819–840. doi: 10.1085/jgp.25.6.819

ENERGY, QUANTA, AND VISION

Selig Hecht 1, Simon Shlaer 1, Maurice Henri Pirenne 1
PMCID: PMC2142545  PMID: 19873316

Abstract

1. Direct measurements of the minimum energy required for threshold vision under optimal physiological conditions yield values between 2.1 and 5.7 x 10–10 ergs at the cornea, which correspond to between 54 and 148 quanta of blue-green light. 2. These values are at the cornea. To yield physiologically significant data they must be corrected for corneal reflection, which is 4 per cent; for ocular media absorption, which is almost precisely 50 per cent; and for retinal transmission, which is at least 80 per cent. Retinal transmission is derived from previous direct measurements and from new comparisons between the percentage absorption spectrum of visual purple with the dim-vision luminosity function. With these three corrections, the range of 54 to 148 quanta at the cornea becomes as an upper limit 5 to 14 quanta actually absorbed by the retinal rods. 3. This small number of quanta, in comparison with the large number of rods (500) involved, precludes any significant two quantum absorptions per rod, and means that in order to produce a visual effect, one quantum must be absorbed by each of 5 to 14 rods in the retina. 4. Because this number of individual events is so small, it may be derived from an independent statistical study of the relation between the intensity of a light flash and the frequency with which it is seen. Such experiments give values of 5 to 8 for the number of critical events involved at the threshold of vision. Biological variation does not alter these numbers essentially, and the agreement between the values measured directly and those derived from statistical considerations is therefore significant. 5. The results clarify the nature of the fluctuations shown by an organism in response to a stimulus. The general assumption has been that the stimulus is constant and the organism variable. The present considerations show, however, that at the threshold it is the stimulus which is variable, and that the properties of its variation determine the fluctuations found between response and stimulus.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Granit R., Holmberg T., Zewi M. On the mode of action of visual purple on the rod cell. J Physiol. 1938 Dec 14;94(3):430–440. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1938.sp003692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Granit R., Munsterhjelm A., Zewi M. The relation between concentration of visual purple and retinal sensitivity to light during dark adaptation. J Physiol. 1939 Jun 14;96(1):31–44. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1939.sp003755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hecht S., Shlaer S., Pirenne M. H. ENERGY AT THE THRESHOLD OF VISION. Science. 1941 Jun 20;93(2425):585–587. doi: 10.1126/science.93.2425.585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lythgoe R. J. The absorption spectra of visual purple and of indicator yellow. J Physiol. 1937 Jun 3;89(4):331–358. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1937.sp003482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES