Skip to main content
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1994 Dec;3(12):2217–2225. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560031207

Contributions of a hydrogen bond/salt bridge network to the stability of secondary and tertiary structure in lambda repressor.

S Marqusee 1, R T Sauer 1
PMCID: PMC2142769  PMID: 7756981

Abstract

In the N-terminal domain of lambda repressor, the Asp 14 side chain forms an intrahelical, hydrogen bond/salt bridge with the Arg 17 side chain and a tertiary hydrogen bond with the Ser 77 side chain. By measuring the stabilities to urea denaturation of the wild-type N-terminal domain and variants containing single, double, and triple alanine substitutions at positions 14, 17, and 77, the side-chain interaction energies, the coupling energy between interactions, and the intrinsic effects of each wild-type side chain on protein stability have been estimated. These studies indicate that the Asp 14-Arg 17 and Asp 14-Ser 77 interactions are stabilizing by roughly 0.8 and 1.5 kcal/mol, respectively, but that Asp 14, by itself, is destabilizing by roughly 0.9 kcal/mol. We also show that a peptide model of alpha-helix 1, which contains Asp 14 and Arg 17, forms a reasonably stable, monomeric helix in solution and responds to alanine mutations at positions 14 and 17 in the fashion expected from the intact protein studies. These studies suggest that it is possible to view the stability effects of mutations in intact proteins in a hierarchical fashion, with the stability of units of secondary structure being distinguishable from the stability of tertiary structure.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alber T., Sun D. P., Wilson K., Wozniak J. A., Cook S. P., Matthews B. W. Contributions of hydrogen bonds of Thr 157 to the thermodynamic stability of phage T4 lysozyme. Nature. 1987 Nov 5;330(6143):41–46. doi: 10.1038/330041a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson D. E., Becktel W. J., Dahlquist F. W. pH-induced denaturation of proteins: a single salt bridge contributes 3-5 kcal/mol to the free energy of folding of T4 lysozyme. Biochemistry. 1990 Mar 6;29(9):2403–2408. doi: 10.1021/bi00461a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barlow D. J., Thornton J. M. Ion-pairs in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1983 Aug 25;168(4):867–885. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80079-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brandts J. F., Kaplan L. J. Derivative sspectroscopy applied to tyrosyl chromophores. Studies on ribonuclease, lima bean inhibitors, insulin, and pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Biochemistry. 1973 May 8;12(10):2011–2024. doi: 10.1021/bi00734a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown L. R., De Marco A., Richarz R., Wagner G., Wüthrich K. The influence of a single salt bridge on static and dynamic features of the globular solution conformation of the basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. 1H and 13C nuclear-magnetic-resonance studies of the native and the transaminated inhibitor. Eur J Biochem. 1978 Jul 17;88(1):87–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1978.tb12425.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fersht A. R. Conformational equilibria in -and -chymotrypsin. The energetics and importance of the salt bridge. J Mol Biol. 1972 Mar 14;64(2):497–509. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90513-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Horovitz A., Serrano L., Avron B., Bycroft M., Fersht A. R. Strength and co-operativity of contributions of surface salt bridges to protein stability. J Mol Biol. 1990 Dec 20;216(4):1031–1044. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(99)80018-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jordan S. R., Pabo C. O. Structure of the lambda complex at 2.5 A resolution: details of the repressor-operator interactions. Science. 1988 Nov 11;242(4880):893–899. doi: 10.1126/science.3187530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lim W. A., Sauer R. T. Alternative packing arrangements in the hydrophobic core of lambda repressor. Nature. 1989 May 4;339(6219):31–36. doi: 10.1038/339031a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lim W. A., Sauer R. T. The role of internal packing interactions in determining the structure and stability of a protein. J Mol Biol. 1991 May 20;219(2):359–376. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90570-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Marqusee S., Baldwin R. L. Helix stabilization by Glu-...Lys+ salt bridges in short peptides of de novo design. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Dec;84(24):8898–8902. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.24.8898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Marqusee S., Robbins V. H., Baldwin R. L. Unusually stable helix formation in short alanine-based peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jul;86(14):5286–5290. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.14.5286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McGregor M. J., Islam S. A., Sternberg M. J. Analysis of the relationship between side-chain conformation and secondary structure in globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 1987 Nov 20;198(2):295–310. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90314-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Muñoz V., Serrano L. Elucidating the folding problem of helical peptides using empirical parameters. Nat Struct Biol. 1994 Jun;1(6):399–409. doi: 10.1038/nsb0694-399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. O'Neil K. T., DeGrado W. F. A thermodynamic scale for the helix-forming tendencies of the commonly occurring amino acids. Science. 1990 Nov 2;250(4981):646–651. doi: 10.1126/science.2237415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pabo C. O., Lewis M. The operator-binding domain of lambda repressor: structure and DNA recognition. Nature. 1982 Jul 29;298(5873):443–447. doi: 10.1038/298443a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pace C. N. Determination and analysis of urea and guanidine hydrochloride denaturation curves. Methods Enzymol. 1986;131:266–280. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)31045-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Reidhaar-Olson J. F., Parsell D. A., Sauer R. T. An essential proline in lambda repressor is required for resistance to intracellular proteolysis. Biochemistry. 1990 Aug 21;29(33):7563–7571. doi: 10.1021/bi00485a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Reidhaar-Olson J. F., Sauer R. T. Functionally acceptable substitutions in two alpha-helical regions of lambda repressor. Proteins. 1990;7(4):306–316. doi: 10.1002/prot.340070403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Scholtz J. M., Baldwin R. L. The mechanism of alpha-helix formation by peptides. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1992;21:95–118. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.21.060192.000523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Serrano L., Fersht A. R. Capping and alpha-helix stability. Nature. 1989 Nov 16;342(6247):296–299. doi: 10.1038/342296a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Serrano L., Horovitz A., Avron B., Bycroft M., Fersht A. R. Estimating the contribution of engineered surface electrostatic interactions to protein stability by using double-mutant cycles. Biochemistry. 1990 Oct 9;29(40):9343–9352. doi: 10.1021/bi00492a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sun D. P., Sauer U., Nicholson H., Matthews B. W. Contributions of engineered surface salt bridges to the stability of T4 lysozyme determined by directed mutagenesis. Biochemistry. 1991 Jul 23;30(29):7142–7153. doi: 10.1021/bi00243a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES