Skip to main content
PMC home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1994 Feb;3(2):257–266. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030210

Real-time DNA binding measurements of the ETS1 recombinant oncoproteins reveal significant kinetic differences between the p42 and p51 isoforms.

R J Fisher 1, M Fivash 1, J Casas-Finet 1, J W Erickson 1, A Kondoh 1, S V Bladen 1, C Fisher 1, D K Watson 1, T Papas 1
PMCID: PMC2142800  PMID: 8003962

Abstract

The sequence-specific DNA binding of recombinant p42 and p51 ETS1 oncoprotein was examined quantitatively to determine whether the loss of the Exon VII phosphorylation domain in p42 ETS1 or the phosphorylation of expressed Exon VII in p51 ETS1 had an effect on DNA binding activity. The kinetics of sequence-specific DNA binding was measured using real-time changes in surface plasmon resonance with BIAcore (registered trademark, Pharmacia Biosensor) technology. The real-time binding of p42 and p51 ETS1 displayed significant differences in kinetic behavior. p51 ETS1 is characterized by a fast initial binding and conversion to a stable complex, whereas p42 ETS1 exhibits a slow initial binding and conversion to a stable complex. All of the p51 ETS1 DNA binding states are characterized by rapid turnover, whereas the p42 ETS1 DNA binding states are 4-20 times more stable. A model describing these kinetic steps is presented. Stoichiometric titrations of either p42 or p51 ETS1 with specific oligonucleotides show 1:1 complex formation. The DNA sequence specificity of the p42 and p51 ETS1 as determined by mutational analysis was similar. The in vitro phosphorylation of p51 ETS1 by CAM kinase II obliterates its binding to specific DNA, suggesting that the regulation of p51 ETS1 sequence-specific DNA binding occurs through phosphorylation by a calcium-dependent second messenger. The p42 ETS1 lacks this regulatory domain (Exon VII), and binding to its specific DNA sequence is not sensitive to calcium signaling.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fisher R. J., Mavrothalassitis G., Kondoh A., Papas T. S. High-affinity DNA-protein interactions of the cellular ETS1 protein: the determination of the ETS binding motif. Oncogene. 1991 Dec;6(12):2249–2254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fleischman L. F., Pilaro A. M., Murakami K., Kondoh A., Fisher R. J., Papas T. S. c-Ets-1 protein is hyperphosphorylated during mitosis. Oncogene. 1993 Mar;8(3):771–780. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gegonne A., Punyammalee B., Rabault B., Bosselut R., Seneca S., Crabeel M., Ghysdael J. Analysis of the DNA binding and transcriptional activation properties of the Ets1 oncoprotein. New Biol. 1992 May;4(5):512–519. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hagman J., Grosschedl R. An inhibitory carboxyl-terminal domain in Ets-1 and Ets-2 mediates differential binding of ETS family factors to promoter sequences of the mb-1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Oct 1;89(19):8889–8893. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.19.8889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hill C. S., Marais R., John S., Wynne J., Dalton S., Treisman R. Functional analysis of a growth factor-responsive transcription factor complex. Cell. 1993 Apr 23;73(2):395–406. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90238-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ho I. C., Bhat N. K., Gottschalk L. R., Lindsten T., Thompson C. B., Papas T. S., Leiden J. M. Sequence-specific binding of human Ets-1 to the T cell receptor alpha gene enhancer. Science. 1990 Nov 9;250(4982):814–818. doi: 10.1126/science.2237431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jorcyk C. L., Watson D. K., Mavrothalassitis G. J., Papas T. S. The human ETS1 gene: genomic structure, promoter characterization and alternative splicing. Oncogene. 1991 Apr;6(4):523–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Krippl B., Ferguson B., Rosenberg M., Westphal H. Functions of purified E1A protein microinjected into mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Nov;81(22):6988–6992. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.22.6988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lim F., Kraut N., Framptom J., Graf T. DNA binding by c-Ets-1, but not v-Ets, is repressed by an intramolecular mechanism. EMBO J. 1992 Feb;11(2):643–652. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05096.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu X., Miller C. W., Koeffler P. H., Berk A. J. The p53 activation domain binds the TATA box-binding polypeptide in Holo-TFIID, and a neighboring p53 domain inhibits transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Jun;13(6):3291–3300. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.6.3291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lohman T. M., Bujalowski W. Thermodynamic methods for model-independent determination of equilibrium binding isotherms for protein-DNA interactions: spectroscopic approaches to monitor binding. Methods Enzymol. 1991;208:258–290. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)08017-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nelsen B., Tian G., Erman B., Gregoire J., Maki R., Graves B., Sen R. Regulation of lymphoid-specific immunoglobulin mu heavy chain gene enhancer by ETS-domain proteins. Science. 1993 Jul 2;261(5117):82–86. doi: 10.1126/science.8316859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nikolov D. B., Hu S. H., Lin J., Gasch A., Hoffmann A., Horikoshi M., Chua N. H., Roeder R. G., Burley S. K. Crystal structure of TFIID TATA-box binding protein. Nature. 1992 Nov 5;360(6399):40–46. doi: 10.1038/360040a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nye J. A., Petersen J. M., Gunther C. V., Jonsen M. D., Graves B. J. Interaction of murine ets-1 with GGA-binding sites establishes the ETS domain as a new DNA-binding motif. Genes Dev. 1992 Jun;6(6):975–990. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.6.975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pongubala J. M., Van Beveren C., Nagulapalli S., Klemsz M. J., McKercher S. R., Maki R. A., Atchison M. L. Effect of PU.1 phosphorylation on interaction with NF-EM5 and transcriptional activation. Science. 1993 Mar 12;259(5101):1622–1625. doi: 10.1126/science.8456286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Record M. T., Jr, Lohman M. L., De Haseth P. Ion effects on ligand-nucleic acid interactions. J Mol Biol. 1976 Oct 25;107(2):145–158. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(76)80023-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Seth A., Ascione R., Fisher R. J., Mavrothalassitis G. J., Bhat N. K., Papas T. S. The ets gene family. Cell Growth Differ. 1992 May;3(5):327–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Thompson C. C., Brown T. A., McKnight S. L. Convergence of Ets- and notch-related structural motifs in a heteromeric DNA binding complex. Science. 1991 Aug 16;253(5021):762–768. doi: 10.1126/science.1876833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wasylyk B., Wasylyk C., Flores P., Begue A., Leprince D., Stehelin D. The c-ets proto-oncogenes encode transcription factors that cooperate with c-Fos and c-Jun for transcriptional activation. Nature. 1990 Jul 12;346(6280):191–193. doi: 10.1038/346191a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wasylyk C., Kerckaert J. P., Wasylyk B. A novel modulator domain of Ets transcription factors. Genes Dev. 1992 Jun;6(6):965–974. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.6.965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Watson D. K., McWilliams M. J., Lapis P., Lautenberger J. A., Schweinfest C. W., Papas T. S. Mammalian ets-1 and ets-2 genes encode highly conserved proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(21):7862–7866. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.21.7862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zawel L., Reinberg D. Initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase II: a multi-step process. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1993;44:67–108. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60217-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES