Skip to main content
PMC home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1994 Aug;3(8):1315–1328. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030818

Recognition of related proteins by iterative template refinement (ITR).

T M Yi 1, E S Lander 1
PMCID: PMC2142931  PMID: 7987226

Abstract

Predicting the structural fold of a protein is an important and challenging problem. Available computer programs for determining whether a protein sequence is compatible with a known 3-dimensional structure fall into 2 categories: (1) structure-based methods, in which structural features such as local conformation and solvent accessibility are encoded in a template, and (2) sequence-based methods, in which aligned sequences of a set of related proteins are encoded in a template. In both cases, the programs use a static template based on a predetermined set of proteins. Here, we describe a computer-based method, called iterative template refinement (ITR), that uses templates combining structure-based and sequence-based information and employs an iterative search procedure to detect related proteins and sequentially add them to the templates. Starting from a single protein of known structure, ITR performs sequential cycles of database search to construct an expanding tree of templates with the aim of identifying subtle relationships among proteins. Evaluating the performance of ITR on 6 proteins, we found that the method automatically identified a variety of subtle structural similarities to other proteins. For example, the method identified structural similarity between arabinose-binding protein and phosphofructokinase, a relationship that has not been widely recognized.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Altschul S. F., Lipman D. J. Protein database searches for multiple alignments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jul;87(14):5509–5513. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.14.5509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ambler R. P. Sequence variability in bacterial cytochromes c. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991 May 23;1058(1):42–47. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2728(05)80266-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker E. N. Structure of azurin from Alcaligenes denitrificans refinement at 1.8 A resolution and comparison of the two crystallographically independent molecules. J Mol Biol. 1988 Oct 20;203(4):1071–1095. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90129-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bashford D., Chothia C., Lesk A. M. Determinants of a protein fold. Unique features of the globin amino acid sequences. J Mol Biol. 1987 Jul 5;196(1):199–216. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90521-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bowie J. U., Lüthy R., Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science. 1991 Jul 12;253(5016):164–170. doi: 10.1126/science.1853201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chelvanayagam G., Heringa J., Argos P. Anatomy and evolution of proteins displaying the viral capsid jellyroll topology. J Mol Biol. 1992 Nov 5;228(1):220–242. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90502-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chothia C., Lesk A. M. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J. 1986 Apr;5(4):823–826. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04288.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chothia C. Proteins. One thousand families for the molecular biologist. Nature. 1992 Jun 18;357(6379):543–544. doi: 10.1038/357543a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Delbaere L. T., Brayer G. D., James M. N. Comparison of the predicted model of alpha-lytic protease with the x-ray structure. Nature. 1979 May 10;279(5709):165–168. doi: 10.1038/279165a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fujinaga M., Delbaere L. T., Brayer G. D., James M. N. Refined structure of alpha-lytic protease at 1.7 A resolution. Analysis of hydrogen bonding and solvent structure. J Mol Biol. 1985 Aug 5;184(3):479–502. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90296-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gilliland G. L., Quiocho F. A. Structure of the L-arabinose-binding protein from Escherichia coli at 2.4 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1981 Mar 5;146(3):341–362. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90392-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Godzik A., Kolinski A., Skolnick J. Topology fingerprint approach to the inverse protein folding problem. J Mol Biol. 1992 Sep 5;227(1):227–238. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90693-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Goldstein R. A., Luthey-Schulten Z. A., Wolynes P. G. Protein tertiary structure recognition using optimized Hamiltonians with local interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Oct 1;89(19):9029–9033. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.19.9029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gonnet G. H., Cohen M. A., Benner S. A. Exhaustive matching of the entire protein sequence database. Science. 1992 Jun 5;256(5062):1443–1445. doi: 10.1126/science.1604319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Guss J. M., Freeman H. C. Structure of oxidized poplar plastocyanin at 1.6 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1983 Sep 15;169(2):521–563. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80064-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Guss J. M., Merritt E. A., Phizackerley R. P., Hedman B., Murata M., Hodgson K. O., Freeman H. C. Phase determination by multiple-wavelength x-ray diffraction: crystal structure of a basic "blue" copper protein from cucumbers. Science. 1988 Aug 12;241(4867):806–811. doi: 10.1126/science.3406739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hazes B., Hol W. G. Comparison of the hemocyanin beta-barrel with other Greek key beta-barrels: possible importance of the "beta-zipper" in protein structure and folding. Proteins. 1992 Mar;12(3):278–298. doi: 10.1002/prot.340120306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Henikoff S., Henikoff J. G. Automated assembly of protein blocks for database searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Dec 11;19(23):6565–6572. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.23.6565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Holm L., Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol. 1993 Sep 5;233(1):123–138. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jones D. T., Taylor W. R., Thornton J. M. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature. 1992 Jul 2;358(6381):86–89. doi: 10.1038/358086a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Karlin S., Bucher P., Brendel V., Altschul S. F. Statistical methods and insights for protein and DNA sequences. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1991;20:175–203. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.20.060191.001135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mathews F. S., Chen Z. W., Bellamy H. D., McIntire W. S. Three-dimensional structure of p-cresol methylhydroxylase (flavocytochrome c) from Pseudomonas putida at 3.0-A resolution. Biochemistry. 1991 Jan 8;30(1):238–247. doi: 10.1021/bi00215a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. McIntire W., Singer T. P., Smith A. J., Mathews F. S. Amino acid and sequence analysis of the cytochrome and flavoprotein subunits of p-cresol methylhydroxylase. Biochemistry. 1986 Oct 7;25(20):5975–5981. doi: 10.1021/bi00368a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pearson W. R., Lipman D. J. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Apr;85(8):2444–2448. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pickett S. D., Saqi M. A., Sternberg M. J. Evaluation of the sequence template method for protein structure prediction. Discrimination of the (beta/alpha)8-barrel fold. J Mol Biol. 1992 Nov 5;228(1):170–187. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90499-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rossmann M. G., Moras D., Olsen K. W. Chemical and biological evolution of nucleotide-binding protein. Nature. 1974 Jul 19;250(463):194–199. doi: 10.1038/250194a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sippl M. J., Weitckus S. Detection of native-like models for amino acid sequences of unknown three-dimensional structure in a data base of known protein conformations. Proteins. 1992 Jul;13(3):258–271. doi: 10.1002/prot.340130308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Smith T. F., Waterman M. S. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol. 1981 Mar 25;147(1):195–197. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90087-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Spurlino J. C., Lu G. Y., Quiocho F. A. The 2.3-A resolution structure of the maltose- or maltodextrin-binding protein, a primary receptor of bacterial active transport and chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 1991 Mar 15;266(8):5202–5219. doi: 10.2210/pdb1mbp/pdb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Taylor W. R. Identification of protein sequence homology by consensus template alignment. J Mol Biol. 1986 Mar 20;188(2):233–258. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90308-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wilmanns M., Eisenberg D. Three-dimensional profiles from residue-pair preferences: identification of sequences with beta/alpha-barrel fold. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Feb 15;90(4):1379–1383. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.4.1379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES