Skip to main content
PMC home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1994 Sep;3(9):1556–1569. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030921

Optimization of the electrostatic interactions in proteins of different functional and folding type.

V Z Spassov 1, A D Karshikoff 1, R Ladenstein 1
PMCID: PMC2142941  PMID: 7833815

Abstract

The 3-dimensional optimization of the electrostatic interactions between the charged amino acid residues was studied by Monte Carlo simulations on an extended representative set of 141 protein structures with known atomic coordinates. The proteins were classified by different functional and structural criteria, and the optimization of the electrostatic interactions was analyzed. The optimization parameters were obtained by comparison of the contribution of charge-charge interactions to the free energy of the native protein structures and for a large number of randomly distributed charge constellations obtained by the Monte Carlo technique. On the basis of the results obtained, one can conclude that the charge-charge interactions are better optimized in the enzymes than in the proteins without enzymatic functions. Proteins that belong to the mixed alpha beta folding type are electrostatically better optimized than pure alpha-helical or beta-strand structures. Proteins that are stabilized by disulfide bonds show a lower degree of electrostatic optimization. The electrostatic interactions in a native protein are effectively optimized by rejection of the conformers that lead to repulsive charge-charge interactions. Particularly, the rejection of the repulsive contacts seems to be a major goal in the protein folding process. The dependence of the optimization parameters on the choice of the potential function was tested. The majority of the potential functions gave practically identical results.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson D. E., Becktel W. J., Dahlquist F. W. pH-induced denaturation of proteins: a single salt bridge contributes 3-5 kcal/mol to the free energy of folding of T4 lysozyme. Biochemistry. 1990 Mar 6;29(9):2403–2408. doi: 10.1021/bi00461a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barlow D. J., Thornton J. M. Ion-pairs in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1983 Aug 25;168(4):867–885. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80079-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barlow D. J., Thornton J. M. The distribution of charged groups in proteins. Biopolymers. 1986 Sep;25(9):1717–1733. doi: 10.1002/bip.360250913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bashford D., Karplus M. pKa's of ionizable groups in proteins: atomic detail from a continuum electrostatic model. Biochemistry. 1990 Nov 6;29(44):10219–10225. doi: 10.1021/bi00496a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernstein F. C., Koetzle T. F., Williams G. J., Meyer E. F., Jr, Brice M. D., Rodgers J. R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol. 1977 May 25;112(3):535–542. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boberg J., Salakoski T., Vihinen M. Selection of a representative set of structures from Brookhaven Protein Data Bank. Proteins. 1992 Oct;14(2):265–276. doi: 10.1002/prot.340140212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bode W., Turk D., Karshikov A. The refined 1.9-A X-ray crystal structure of D-Phe-Pro-Arg chloromethylketone-inhibited human alpha-thrombin: structure analysis, overall structure, electrostatic properties, detailed active-site geometry, and structure-function relationships. Protein Sci. 1992 Apr;1(4):426–471. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560010402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bryant S. H., Lawrence C. E. The frequency of ion-pair substructures in proteins is quantitatively related to electrostatic potential: a statistical model for nonbonded interactions. Proteins. 1991;9(2):108–119. doi: 10.1002/prot.340090205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Devereux J., Haeberli P., Smithies O. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jan 11;12(1 Pt 1):387–395. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part1.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dill K. A. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry. 1990 Aug 7;29(31):7133–7155. doi: 10.1021/bi00483a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fersht A. R. Conformational equilibria in -and -chymotrypsin. The energetics and importance of the salt bridge. J Mol Biol. 1972 Mar 14;64(2):497–509. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90513-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kabsch W., Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 1983 Dec;22(12):2577–2637. doi: 10.1002/bip.360221211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Karshikov A., Bode W. Electrostatic properties of thrombin: importance for structural stabilization and ligand binding. Semin Thromb Hemost. 1993;19(4):334–343. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee B., Richards F. M. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol. 1971 Feb 14;55(3):379–400. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Levitt M., Chothia C. Structural patterns in globular proteins. Nature. 1976 Jun 17;261(5561):552–558. doi: 10.1038/261552a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Meiering E. M., Serrano L., Fersht A. R. Effect of active site residues in barnase on activity and stability. J Mol Biol. 1992 Jun 5;225(3):585–589. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90387-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nakashima H., Nishikawa K., Ooi T. The folding type of a protein is relevant to the amino acid composition. J Biochem. 1986 Jan;99(1):153–162. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a135454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Perutz M. F. Electrostatic effects in proteins. Science. 1978 Sep 29;201(4362):1187–1191. doi: 10.1126/science.694508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Perutz M. F., Raidt H. Stereochemical basis of heat stability in bacterial ferredoxins and in haemoglobin A2. Nature. 1975 May 15;255(5505):256–259. doi: 10.1038/255256a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ponnuswamy P. K. Hydrophobic characteristics of folded proteins. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1993;59(1):57–103. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(93)90007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shire S. J., Hanania G. I., Gurd F. R. Electrostatic effects in myoglobin. Hydrogen ion equilibria in sperm whale ferrimyoglobin. Biochemistry. 1974 Jul 2;13(14):2967–2974. doi: 10.1021/bi00711a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tanford C., Roxby R. Interpretation of protein titration curves. Application to lysozyme. Biochemistry. 1972 May 23;11(11):2192–2198. doi: 10.1021/bi00761a029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Warshel A., Russell S. T. Calculations of electrostatic interactions in biological systems and in solutions. Q Rev Biophys. 1984 Aug;17(3):283–422. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500005333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Warwicker J., Watson H. C. Calculation of the electric potential in the active site cleft due to alpha-helix dipoles. J Mol Biol. 1982 Jun 5;157(4):671–679. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90505-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yang A. S., Gunner M. R., Sampogna R., Sharp K., Honig B. On the calculation of pKas in proteins. Proteins. 1993 Mar;15(3):252–265. doi: 10.1002/prot.340150304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES