Skip to main content
PMC home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1994 Sep;3(9):1504–1514. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030916

Anatomy of an engineered NAD-binding site.

P R Mittl 1, A Berry 1, N S Scrutton 1, R N Perham 1, G E Schulz 1
PMCID: PMC2142952  PMID: 7833810

Abstract

The coenzyme specificity of Escherichia coli glutathione reductase was switched from NADP to NAD by modifying the environment of the 2'-phosphate binding site through a set of point mutations: A179G, A183G, V197E, R198M, K199F, H200D, and R204P (Scrutton NS, Berry A, Perham RN, 1990, Nature 343:38-43). In order to analyze the structural changes involved, we have determined 4 high-resolution crystal structures, i.e., the structures of the wild-type enzyme (1.86 A resolution, R-factor of 16.8%), of the wild-type enzyme ligated with NADP (2.0 A, 20.8%), of the NAD-dependent mutant (1.74 A, 16.8%), and of the NAD-dependent mutant ligated with NAD (2.2 A, 16.9%). A comparison of these structures reveals subtle differences that explain details of the specificity change. In particular, a peptide rotation occurs close to the adenosine ribose, with a concomitant change of the ribose pucker. The mutations cause a contraction of the local chain fold. Furthermore, the engineered NAD-binding site assumes a less rigid structure than the NADP site of the wild-type enzyme. A superposition of the ligated structures shows a displacement of NAD versus NADP such that the electron pathway from the nicotinamide ring to FAD is elongated, which may explain the lower catalytic efficiency of the mutant. Because the nicotinamide is as much as 15 A from the sites of the mutations, this observation reminds us that mutations may have important long-range consequences that are difficult to anticipate.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (929.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abad-Zapatero C., Griffith J. P., Sussman J. L., Rossmann M. G. Refined crystal structure of dogfish M4 apo-lactate dehydrogenase. J Mol Biol. 1987 Dec 5;198(3):445–467. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90293-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker P. J., Britton K. L., Rice D. W., Rob A., Stillman T. J. Structural consequences of sequence patterns in the fingerprint region of the nucleotide binding fold. Implications for nucleotide specificity. J Mol Biol. 1992 Nov 20;228(2):662–671. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90848-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bocanegra J. A., Scrutton N. S., Perham R. N. Creation of an NADP-dependent pyruvate dehydrogenase multienzyme complex by protein engineering. Biochemistry. 1993 Mar 23;32(11):2737–2740. doi: 10.1021/bi00062a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brünger A. T., Kuriyan J., Karplus M. Crystallographic R factor refinement by molecular dynamics. Science. 1987 Jan 23;235(4787):458–460. doi: 10.1126/science.235.4787.458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fersht A. R., Shi J. P., Knill-Jones J., Lowe D. M., Wilkinson A. J., Blow D. M., Brick P., Carter P., Waye M. M., Winter G. Hydrogen bonding and biological specificity analysed by protein engineering. Nature. 1985 Mar 21;314(6008):235–238. doi: 10.1038/314235a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hanukoglu I., Gutfinger T. cDNA sequence of adrenodoxin reductase. Identification of NADP-binding sites in oxidoreductases. Eur J Biochem. 1989 Mar 15;180(2):479–484. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb14671.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Karplus P. A., Schulz G. E. Refined structure of glutathione reductase at 1.54 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1987 Jun 5;195(3):701–729. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90191-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Karplus P. A., Schulz G. E. Substrate binding and catalysis by glutathione reductase as derived from refined enzyme: substrate crystal structures at 2 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1989 Nov 5;210(1):163–180. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90298-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kuriyan J., Krishna T. S., Wong L., Guenther B., Pahler A., Williams C. H., Jr, Model P. Convergent evolution of similar function in two structurally divergent enzymes. Nature. 1991 Jul 11;352(6331):172–174. doi: 10.1038/352172a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mattevi A., Schierbeek A. J., Hol W. G. Refined crystal structure of lipoamide dehydrogenase from Azotobacter vinelandii at 2.2 A resolution. A comparison with the structure of glutathione reductase. J Mol Biol. 1991 Aug 20;220(4):975–994. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90367-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mittl P. R., Berry A., Scrutton N. S., Perham R. N., Schulz G. E. Structural differences between wild-type NADP-dependent glutathione reductase from Escherichia coli and a redesigned NAD-dependent mutant. J Mol Biol. 1993 May 20;231(2):191–195. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mittl P. R., Schulz G. E. Structure of glutathione reductase from Escherichia coli at 1.86 A resolution: comparison with the enzyme from human erythrocytes. Protein Sci. 1994 May;3(5):799–809. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Müller C. W., Schulz G. E. Structure of the complex between adenylate kinase from Escherichia coli and the inhibitor Ap5A refined at 1.9 A resolution. A model for a catalytic transition state. J Mol Biol. 1992 Mar 5;224(1):159–177. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90582-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pai E. F., Karplus P. A., Schulz G. E. Crystallographic analysis of the binding of NADPH, NADPH fragments, and NADPH analogues to glutathione reductase. Biochemistry. 1988 Jun 14;27(12):4465–4474. doi: 10.1021/bi00412a038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rescigno M., Perham R. N. Structure of the NADPH-binding motif of glutathione reductase: efficiency determined by evolution. Biochemistry. 1994 May 17;33(19):5721–5727. doi: 10.1021/bi00185a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schiering N., Kabsch W., Moore M. J., Distefano M. D., Walsh C. T., Pai E. F. Structure of the detoxification catalyst mercuric ion reductase from Bacillus sp. strain RC607. Nature. 1991 Jul 11;352(6331):168–172. doi: 10.1038/352168a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Scrutton N. S., Berry A., Perham R. N. Purification and characterization of glutathione reductase encoded by a cloned and over-expressed gene in Escherichia coli. Biochem J. 1987 Aug 1;245(3):875–880. doi: 10.1042/bj2450875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Scrutton N. S., Berry A., Perham R. N. Redesign of the coenzyme specificity of a dehydrogenase by protein engineering. Nature. 1990 Jan 4;343(6253):38–43. doi: 10.1038/343038a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stehle T., Claiborne A., Schulz G. E. NADH binding site and catalysis of NADH peroxidase. Eur J Biochem. 1993 Jan 15;211(1-2):221–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb19889.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stephens P. E., Lewis H. M., Darlison M. G., Guest J. R. Nucleotide sequence of the lipoamide dehydrogenase gene of Escherichia coli K12. Eur J Biochem. 1983 Oct 3;135(3):519–527. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07683.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wierenga R. K., Terpstra P., Hol W. G. Prediction of the occurrence of the ADP-binding beta alpha beta-fold in proteins, using an amino acid sequence fingerprint. J Mol Biol. 1986 Jan 5;187(1):101–107. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90409-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES