Skip to main content
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1995 Jun;4(6):1100–1107. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040608

Quantitative approaches to utilizing mutational analysis and disulfide crosslinking for modeling a transmembrane domain.

G F Lee 1, G L Hazelbauer 1
PMCID: PMC2143136  PMID: 7549874

Abstract

The transmembrane domain of chemoreceptor Trg from Escherichia coli contains four transmembrane segments in its native homodimer, two from each subunit. We had previously used mutational analysis and sulfhydryl cross-linking between introduced cysteines to obtain data relevant to the three-dimensional organization of this domain. In the current study we used Fourier analysis to assess these data quantitatively for periodicity along the sequences of the segments. The analyses provided a strong indication of alpha-helical periodicity in the first transmembrane segment and a substantial indication of that periodicity for the second segment. On this basis, we considered both segments as idealized alpha-helices and proceeded to model the transmembrane domain as a unit of four helices. For this modeling, we calculated helical crosslinking moments, parameters analogous to helical hydrophobic moments, as a quantitative way of condensing and utilizing a large body of crosslinking data. Crosslinking moments were used to define the relative separation and orientation of helical pairs, thus creating a quantitatively derived model for the transmembrane domain of Trg. Utilization of Fourier transforms to provide a quantitative indication of periodicity in data from analyses of transmembrane segments, in combination with helical crosslinking moments to position helical pairs should be useful in modeling other transmembrane domains.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (760.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akabas M. H., Stauffer D. A., Xu M., Karlin A. Acetylcholine receptor channel structure probed in cysteine-substitution mutants. Science. 1992 Oct 9;258(5080):307–310. doi: 10.1126/science.1384130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Altenbach C., Marti T., Khorana H. G., Hubbell W. L. Transmembrane protein structure: spin labeling of bacteriorhodopsin mutants. Science. 1990 Jun 1;248(4959):1088–1092. doi: 10.1126/science.2160734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bourret R. B., Borkovich K. A., Simon M. I. Signal transduction pathways involving protein phosphorylation in prokaryotes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1991;60:401–441. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.60.070191.002153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Careaga C. L., Falke J. J. Thermal motions of surface alpha-helices in the D-galactose chemosensory receptor. Detection by disulfide trapping. J Mol Biol. 1992 Aug 20;226(4):1219–1235. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)91063-u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cornette J. L., Cease K. B., Margalit H., Spouge J. L., Berzofsky J. A., DeLisi C. Hydrophobicity scales and computational techniques for detecting amphipathic structures in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1987 Jun 5;195(3):659–685. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90189-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eisenberg D., Weiss R. M., Terwilliger T. C. The helical hydrophobic moment: a measure of the amphiphilicity of a helix. Nature. 1982 Sep 23;299(5881):371–374. doi: 10.1038/299371a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eisenberg D., Weiss R. M., Terwilliger T. C. The hydrophobic moment detects periodicity in protein hydrophobicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jan;81(1):140–144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.1.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lemmon M. A., Flanagan J. M., Treutlein H. R., Zhang J., Engelman D. M. Sequence specificity in the dimerization of transmembrane alpha-helices. Biochemistry. 1992 Dec 29;31(51):12719–12725. doi: 10.1021/bi00166a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lynch B. A., Koshland D. E., Jr Disulfide cross-linking studies of the transmembrane regions of the aspartate sensory receptor of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Dec 1;88(23):10402–10406. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Milburn M. V., Privé G. G., Milligan D. L., Scott W. G., Yeh J., Jancarik J., Koshland D. E., Jr, Kim S. H. Three-dimensional structures of the ligand-binding domain of the bacterial aspartate receptor with and without a ligand. Science. 1991 Nov 29;254(5036):1342–1347. doi: 10.1126/science.1660187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Morgan D. G., Baumgartner J. W., Hazelbauer G. L. Proteins antigenically related to methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins of Escherichia coli detected in a wide range of bacterial species. J Bacteriol. 1993 Jan;175(1):133–140. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.1.133-140.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pakula A. A., Simon M. I. Determination of transmembrane protein structure by disulfide cross-linking: the Escherichia coli Tar receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 May 1;89(9):4144–4148. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.9.4144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rees D. C., DeAntonio L., Eisenberg D. Hydrophobic organization of membrane proteins. Science. 1989 Aug 4;245(4917):510–513. doi: 10.1126/science.2667138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sahin-Tóth M., Kaback H. R. Cysteine scanning mutagenesis of putative transmembrane helices IX and X in the lactose permease of Escherichia coli. Protein Sci. 1993 Jun;2(6):1024–1033. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560020615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sahin-Tóth M., Persson B., Schwieger J., Cohan P., Kaback H. R. Cysteine scanning mutagenesis of the N-terminal 32 amino acid residues in the lactose permease of Escherichia coli. Protein Sci. 1994 Feb;3(2):240–247. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yaghmai R., Hazelbauer G. L. Ligand occupancy mimicked by single residue substitutions in a receptor: transmembrane signaling induced by mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 1;89(17):7890–7894. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.7890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yeh J. I., Biemann H. P., Pandit J., Koshland D. E., Kim S. H. The three-dimensional structure of the ligand-binding domain of a wild-type bacterial chemotaxis receptor. Structural comparison to the cross-linked mutant forms and conformational changes upon ligand binding. J Biol Chem. 1993 May 5;268(13):9787–9792. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES