Skip to main content
PMC home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1995 Jun;4(6):1088–1099. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040607

Probing the solution structure of the DNA-binding protein Max by a combination of proteolysis and mass spectrometry.

S L Cohen 1, A R Ferré-D'Amaré 1, S K Burley 1, B T Chait 1
PMCID: PMC2143150  PMID: 7549873

Abstract

A simple biochemical method that combines enzymatic proteolysis and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry was developed to probe the solution structure of DNA-binding proteins. The method is based on inferring structural information from determinations of protection against enzymatic proteolysis, as governed by solvent accessibility and protein flexibility. This approach was applied to the study of the transcription factor Max--a member of the basic/helix-loop-helix/zipper family of DNA-binding proteins. In the absence of DNA and at low ionic strengths, Max is rapidly digested by each of six endoproteases selected for the study, results consistent with an open and flexible structure of the protein. At physiological salt levels, the rates of digestion are moderately slowed; this and the patterns of cleavage are consistent with homodimerization of the protein through a predominantly hydrophobic interface. In the presence of Max-specific DNA, the protein becomes dramatically protected against proteolysis, exhibiting up to a 100-fold reduction in cleavage rates. Over a 2-day period, both complete and partial proteolysis of the Max-DNA complex is observed. The partial proteolytic fragmentation patterns reflect a very high degree of protection in the N-terminal and helix-loop-helix regions of the protein, correlating with those expected of a stable dimer bound to DNA at its basic N-terminals. Less protection is seen at the C-terminal where a slow, sequential proteolytic cleavage occurs, correlating to the presence of a leucine zipper. The results also indicate a high affinity of Max for its target DNA that remains high even when the leucine zipper is proteolytically removed. In addition to the study of the helix-loop-helix protein Max, the present method appears well suited for a range of other structural biological applications.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aebersold R. Mass spectrometry of proteins and peptides in biotechnology. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1993 Aug;4(4):412–419. doi: 10.1016/0958-1669(93)90006-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amati B., Brooks M. W., Levy N., Littlewood T. D., Evan G. I., Land H. Oncogenic activity of the c-Myc protein requires dimerization with Max. Cell. 1993 Jan 29;72(2):233–245. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90663-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anthony-Cahill S. J., Benfield P. A., Fairman R., Wasserman Z. R., Brenner S. L., Stafford W. F., 3rd, Altenbach C., Hubbell W. L., DeGrado W. F. Molecular characterization of helix-loop-helix peptides. Science. 1992 Feb 21;255(5047):979–983. doi: 10.1126/science.1312255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baxevanis A. D., Vinson C. R. Interactions of coiled coils in transcription factors: where is the specificity? Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1993 Apr;3(2):278–285. doi: 10.1016/0959-437x(93)90035-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beavis R. C., Chait B. T. Factors affecting the ultraviolet laser desorption of proteins. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1989 Jul;3(7):233–237. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1290030708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Beavis R. C., Chait B. T. High-accuracy molecular mass determination of proteins using matrix-assisted laser desorption mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 1990 Sep 1;62(17):1836–1840. doi: 10.1021/ac00216a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Beavis R. C., Chait B. T. Rapid, sensitive analysis of protein mixtures by mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Sep;87(17):6873–6877. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.17.6873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Billeci T. M., Stults J. T. Tryptic mapping of recombinant proteins by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 1993 Jul 1;65(13):1709–1716. doi: 10.1021/ac00061a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blackwood E. M., Eisenman R. N. Max: a helix-loop-helix zipper protein that forms a sequence-specific DNA-binding complex with Myc. Science. 1991 Mar 8;251(4998):1211–1217. doi: 10.1126/science.2006410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Blackwood E. M., Lüscher B., Eisenman R. N. Myc and Max associate in vivo. Genes Dev. 1992 Jan;6(1):71–80. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brockerhoff S. E., Edmonds C. G., Davis T. N. Structural analysis of wild-type and mutant yeast calmodulins by limited proteolysis and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Protein Sci. 1992 Apr;1(4):504–516. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560010405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellenberger T., Fass D., Arnaud M., Harrison S. C. Crystal structure of transcription factor E47: E-box recognition by a basic region helix-loop-helix dimer. Genes Dev. 1994 Apr 15;8(8):970–980. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.8.970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ferré-D'Amaré A. R., Pognonec P., Roeder R. G., Burley S. K. Structure and function of the b/HLH/Z domain of USF. EMBO J. 1994 Jan 1;13(1):180–189. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06247.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferré-D'Amaré A. R., Prendergast G. C., Ziff E. B., Burley S. K. Recognition by Max of its cognate DNA through a dimeric b/HLH/Z domain. Nature. 1993 May 6;363(6424):38–45. doi: 10.1038/363038a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fontana A., Fassina G., Vita C., Dalzoppo D., Zamai M., Zambonin M. Correlation between sites of limited proteolysis and segmental mobility in thermolysin. Biochemistry. 1986 Apr 22;25(8):1847–1851. doi: 10.1021/bi00356a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hubbard S. J., Eisenmenger F., Thornton J. M. Modeling studies of the change in conformation required for cleavage of limited proteolytic sites. Protein Sci. 1994 May;3(5):757–768. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kato G. J., Lee W. M., Chen L. L., Dang C. V. Max: functional domains and interaction with c-Myc. Genes Dev. 1992 Jan;6(1):81–92. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Landschulz W. H., Johnson P. F., McKnight S. L. The leucine zipper: a hypothetical structure common to a new class of DNA binding proteins. Science. 1988 Jun 24;240(4860):1759–1764. doi: 10.1126/science.3289117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Littlewood T. D., Evan G. I. Transcription factors 2: helix-loop-helix. Protein Profile. 1994;1(6):635–709. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. O'Shea E. K., Rutkowski R., Kim P. S. Evidence that the leucine zipper is a coiled coil. Science. 1989 Jan 27;243(4890):538–542. doi: 10.1126/science.2911757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Prendergast G. C., Lawe D., Ziff E. B. Association of Myn, the murine homolog of max, with c-Myc stimulates methylation-sensitive DNA binding and ras cotransformation. Cell. 1991 May 3;65(3):395–407. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90457-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Record M. T., Jr, Ha J. H., Fisher M. A. Analysis of equilibrium and kinetic measurements to determine thermodynamic origins of stability and specificity and mechanism of formation of site-specific complexes between proteins and helical DNA. Methods Enzymol. 1991;208:291–343. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)08018-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Reddy C. D., Dasgupta P., Saikumar P., Dudek H., Rauscher F. J., 3rd, Reddy E. P. Mutational analysis of Max: role of basic, helix-loop-helix/leucine zipper domains in DNA binding, dimerization and regulation of Myc-mediated transcriptional activation. Oncogene. 1992 Oct;7(10):2085–2092. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Spolar R. S., Record M. T., Jr Coupling of local folding to site-specific binding of proteins to DNA. Science. 1994 Feb 11;263(5148):777–784. doi: 10.1126/science.8303294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Starovasnik M. A., Blackwell T. K., Laue T. M., Weintraub H., Klevit R. E. Folding topology of the disulfide-bonded dimeric DNA-binding domain of the myogenic determination factor MyoD. Biochemistry. 1992 Oct 20;31(41):9891–9903. doi: 10.1021/bi00156a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sørensen S. B., Sørensen T. L., Breddam K. Fragmentation of proteins by S. aureus strain V8 protease. Ammonium bicarbonate strongly inhibits the enzyme but does not improve the selectivity for glutamic acid. FEBS Lett. 1991 Dec 9;294(3):195–197. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80667-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tsarbopoulos A., Karas M., Strupat K., Pramanik B. N., Nagabhushan T. L., Hillenkamp F. Comparative mapping of recombinant proteins and glycoproteins by plasma desorption and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 1994 Jul 1;66(13):2062–2070. doi: 10.1021/ac00085a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang R., Chait B. T. High-accuracy mass measurement as a tool for studying proteins. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1994 Feb;5(1):77–84. doi: 10.1016/s0958-1669(05)80074-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES