Skip to main content
PMC home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1995 Aug;4(8):1535–1543. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040811

Control of aggregation in protein refolding: a variety of surfactants promote renaturation of carbonic anhydrase II.

D B Wetlaufer 1, Y Xie 1
PMCID: PMC2143183  PMID: 8520479

Abstract

The denaturation and renaturation of carbonic anhydrase II (CAII) has been studied in several laboratories. Both thermodynamic and kinetic evidence support the existence of at least two intermediates between denatured and native protein. Previous studies have shown that on rapid dilution of a CAII solution from 5 M to 1 M guanidinium chloride, aggregation strongly competes with renaturation at higher protein concentrations, suggesting an upper limit for [CAII] of approximately 0.1%. Our experiments show 60% renaturation at 0.4% [CAII] and that aggregate formation is partially reversible. This yield can be substantially increased by several surfactant additives, including simple alkanols as well as micelle-forming surfactants. Effective surfactants (promoters) act by suppressing initial aggregate formation, not by dissolving aggregates. Promoters act on either the first folding intermediate (I1) or oligomers thereof. Eight of the 18 surfactants examined showed promoter activity, and no correlation was evident between promoter activity and chemical structure or surface tension lowering. These results indicate discrimination (molecular recognition) by I1 and/or its oligomers.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (871.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brito R. M., Vaz W. L. Determination of the critical micelle concentration of surfactants using the fluorescent probe N-phenyl-1-naphthylamine. Anal Biochem. 1986 Feb 1;152(2):250–255. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(86)90406-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buchner J., Rudolph R. Routes to active proteins from transformed microorganisms. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1991 Aug;2(4):532–538. doi: 10.1016/0958-1669(91)90077-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cleland J. L., Hedgepeth C., Wang D. I. Polyethylene glycol enhanced refolding of bovine carbonic anhydrase B. Reaction stoichiometry and refolding model. J Biol Chem. 1992 Jul 5;267(19):13327–13334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cleland J. L., Wang D. I. Refolding and aggregation of bovine carbonic anhydrase B: quasi-elastic light scattering analysis. Biochemistry. 1990 Dec 18;29(50):11072–11078. doi: 10.1021/bi00502a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hjelmeland L. M., Nebert D. W., Osborne J. C., Jr Sulfobetaine derivatives of bile acids: nondenaturing surfactants for membrane biochemistry. Anal Biochem. 1983 Apr 1;130(1):72–82. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90651-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ikai A., Tanaka S., Noda H. Reactivation of kinetics of guanidine denatured bovine carbonic anhydrase B. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1978 Sep;190(1):39–45. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(78)90251-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pocker Y., Stone J. T. The catalytic versatility of erythrocyte carbonic anhydrase. 3. Kinetic studies of the enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl acetate. Biochemistry. 1967 Mar;6(3):668–678. doi: 10.1021/bi00855a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Saxena V. P., Wetlaufer D. B. Formation of three-dimensional structure in proteins. I. Rapid nonenzymic reactivation of reduced lysozyme. Biochemistry. 1970 Dec 8;9(25):5015–5023. doi: 10.1021/bi00827a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Semisotnov G. V., Uversky V. N., Sokolovsky I. V., Gutin A. M., Razgulyaev O. I., Rodionova N. A. Two slow stages in refolding of bovine carbonic anhydrase B are due to proline isomerization. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jun 5;213(3):561–568. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80215-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stein P. J., Henkens R. W. Detection of intermediates in protein folding of carbonic anhydrase with fluorescence emission and polarization. J Biol Chem. 1978 Nov 25;253(22):8016–8018. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tandon S., Horowitz P. M. Detergent-assisted refolding of guanidinium chloride-denatured rhodanese. The effects of the concentration and type of detergent. J Biol Chem. 1987 Apr 5;262(10):4486–4491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wong K. P., Tanford C. Denaturation of bovine carbonic anhydrase B by guanidine hydrochloride. A process involving separable sequential conformational transitions. J Biol Chem. 1973 Dec 25;248(24):8518–8523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yazgan A., Henkens R. W. Role of zinc (II) in the refolding of guanidine hydrochloride denatured bovine carbonic anhydrase. Biochemistry. 1972 Mar 28;11(7):1314–1318. doi: 10.1021/bi00757a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zardeneta G., Horowitz P. M. Micelle-assisted protein folding. Denatured rhodanese binding to cardiolipin-containing lauryl maltoside micelles results in slower refolding kinetics but greater enzyme reactivation. J Biol Chem. 1992 Mar 25;267(9):5811–5816. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zettlmeissl G., Rudolph R., Jaenicke R. Reconstitution of lactic dehydrogenase. Noncovalent aggregation vs. reactivation. 1. Physical properties and kinetics of aggregation. Biochemistry. 1979 Dec 11;18(25):5567–5571. doi: 10.1021/bi00592a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES