Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1995 Sep;4(9):1780–1791. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040913

Exhaustive enumeration of protein conformations using experimental restraints.

R S DeWitte 1, S W Michnick 1, E I Shakhnovich 1
PMCID: PMC2143215  PMID: 8528076

Abstract

We present an efficient new algorithm that enumerates all possible conformations of a protein that satisfy a given set of distance restraints. Rapid growth of all possible self-avoiding conformations on the diamond lattice provides construction of alpha-carbon representations of a protein fold. We investigated the dependence of the number of conformations on pairwise distance restraints for the proteins crambin, pancreatic trypsin inhibitor, and ubiquitin. Knowledge of between one and two contacts per monomer is shown to be sufficient to restrict the number of candidate structures to approximately 1,000 conformations. Pairwise RMS deviations of atomic position comparisons between pairs of these 1,000 structures revealed that these conformations can be grouped into about 25 families of structures. These results suggest a new approach to assessing alternative protein folds given a very limited number of distance restraints. Such restraints are available from several experimental techniques such as NMR, NOESY, energy transfer fluorescence spectroscopy, and crosslinking experiments. This work focuses on exhaustive enumeration of protein structures with emphasis on the possible use of NOESY-determined distance restraints.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bryant S. H., Lawrence C. E. An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through the folding motif. Proteins. 1993 May;16(1):92–112. doi: 10.1002/prot.340160110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brünger A. T., Clore G. M., Gronenborn A. M., Karplus M. Three-dimensional structure of proteins determined by molecular dynamics with interproton distance restraints: application to crambin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(11):3801–3805. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.11.3801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clore G. M., Brünger A. T., Karplus M., Gronenborn A. M. Application of molecular dynamics with interproton distance restraints to three-dimensional protein structure determination. A model study of crambin. J Mol Biol. 1986 Oct 5;191(3):523–551. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90146-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clore G. M., Gronenborn A. M. Two-, three-, and four-dimensional NMR methods for obtaining larger and more precise three-dimensional structures of proteins in solution. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1991;20:29–63. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.20.060191.000333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clore G. M., Robien M. A., Gronenborn A. M. Exploring the limits of precision and accuracy of protein structures determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Mol Biol. 1993 May 5;231(1):82–102. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clore G. M., Wingfield P. T., Gronenborn A. M. High-resolution three-dimensional structure of interleukin 1 beta in solution by three- and four-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 1991 Mar 5;30(9):2315–2323. doi: 10.1021/bi00223a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Covell D. G., Jernigan R. L. Conformations of folded proteins in restricted spaces. Biochemistry. 1990 Apr 3;29(13):3287–3294. doi: 10.1021/bi00465a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. DeWitte R. S., Shakhnovich E. I. Pseudodihedrals: simplified protein backbone representation with knowledge-based energy. Protein Sci. 1994 Sep;3(9):1570–1581. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eftink M. R., Wasylewski Z., Ghiron C. A. Phase-resolved spectral measurements with several two tryptophan containing proteins. Biochemistry. 1987 Dec 15;26(25):8338–8346. doi: 10.1021/bi00399a047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gronenborn A. M., Filpula D. R., Essig N. Z., Achari A., Whitlow M., Wingfield P. T., Clore G. M. A novel, highly stable fold of the immunoglobulin binding domain of streptococcal protein G. Science. 1991 Aug 9;253(5020):657–661. doi: 10.1126/science.1871600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kabsch W., Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 1983 Dec;22(12):2577–2637. doi: 10.1002/bip.360221211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Maiorov V. N., Crippen G. M. Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 1992 Oct 5;227(3):876–888. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90228-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nilges M., Clore G. M., Gronenborn A. M. Determination of three-dimensional structures of proteins from interproton distance data by hybrid distance geometry-dynamical simulated annealing calculations. FEBS Lett. 1988 Mar 14;229(2):317–324. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(88)81148-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shakhnovich E. I., Gutin A. M. Implications of thermodynamics of protein folding for evolution of primary sequences. Nature. 1990 Aug 23;346(6286):773–775. doi: 10.1038/346773a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sippl M. J. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jun 20;213(4):859–883. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80269-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Thomas P. D., Basus V. J., James T. L. Protein solution structure determination using distances from two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect experiments: effect of approximations on the accuracy of derived structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Feb 15;88(4):1237–1241. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.4.1237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vijay-Kumar S., Bugg C. E., Cook W. J. Structure of ubiquitin refined at 1.8 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1987 Apr 5;194(3):531–544. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90679-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wishart D. S., Sykes B. D., Richards F. M. Relationship between nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shift and protein secondary structure. J Mol Biol. 1991 Nov 20;222(2):311–333. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90214-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wlodawer A., Walter J., Huber R., Sjölin L. Structure of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Results of joint neutron and X-ray refinement of crystal form II. J Mol Biol. 1984 Dec 5;180(2):301–329. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(84)80006-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES