Skip to main content
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1996 Dec;5(12):2600–2616. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560051223

Conformational analysis and clustering of short and medium size loops connecting regular secondary structures: a database for modeling and prediction.

L E Donate 1, S D Rufino 1, L H Canard 1, T L Blundell 1
PMCID: PMC2143328  PMID: 8976569

Abstract

Loops are regions of nonrepetitive conformation connecting regular secondary structures. We identified 2,024 loops of one to eight residues in length, with acceptable main-chain bond lengths and peptide bond angles, from a database of 223 protein and protein-domain structures. Each loop is characterized by its sequence, main-chain conformation, and relative disposition of its bounding secondary structures as described by the separation between the tips of their axes and the angle between them. Loops, grouped according to their length and type of their bounding secondary structures, were superposed and clustered into 161 conformational classes, corresponding to 63% of all loops. Of these, 109 (51% of the loops) were populated by at least four nonhomologous loops or four loops sharing a low sequence identity. Another 52 classes, including 12% of the loops, were populated by at least three loops of low sequence similarity from three or fewer nonhomologous groups. Loop class suprafamilies resulting from variations in the termini of secondary structures are discussed in this article. Most previously described loop conformations were found among the classes. New classes included a 2:4 type IV hairpin, a helix-capping loop, and a loop that mediates dinucleotide-binding. The relative disposition of bounding secondary structures varies among loop classes, with some classes such as beta-hairpins being very restrictive. For each class, sequence preferences as key residues were identified; those most frequently at these conserved positions than in proteins were Gly, Asp, Pro, Phe, and Cys. Most of these residues are involved in stabilizing loop conformation, often through a positive phi conformation or secondary structure capping. Identification of helix-capping residues and beta-breakers among the highly conserved positions supported our decision to group loops according to their bounding secondary structures. Several of the identified loop classes were associated with specific functions, and all of the member loops had the same function; key residues were conserved for this purpose, as is the case for the parvalbumin-like calcium-binding loops. A significant number, but not all, of the member loops of other loop classes had the same function, as is the case for the helix-turn-helix DNA-binding loops. This article provides a systematic and coherent conformational classification of loops, covering a broad range of lengths and all four combinations of bounding secondary structure types, and supplies a useful basis for modelling of loop conformations where the bounding secondary structures are known or reliably predicted.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blundell T., Carney D., Gardner S., Hayes F., Howlin B., Hubbard T., Overington J., Singh D. A., Sibanda B. L., Sutcliffe M. 18th Sir Hans Krebs lecture. Knowledge-based protein modelling and design. Eur J Biochem. 1988 Mar 15;172(3):513–520. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb13917.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brennan R. G., Matthews B. W. The helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif. J Biol Chem. 1989 Feb 5;264(4):1903–1906. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chan A. W., Hutchinson E. G., Harris D., Thornton J. M. Identification, classification, and analysis of beta-bulges in proteins. Protein Sci. 1993 Oct;2(10):1574–1590. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560021004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chothia C., Lesk A. M., Tramontano A., Levitt M., Smith-Gill S. J., Air G., Sheriff S., Padlan E. A., Davies D., Tulip W. R. Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions. Nature. 1989 Dec 21;342(6252):877–883. doi: 10.1038/342877a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Colloc'h N., Cohen F. E. Beta-breakers: an aperiodic secondary structure. J Mol Biol. 1991 Sep 20;221(2):603–613. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)80075-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dasgupta S., Bell J. A. Design of helix ends. Amino acid preferences, hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1993 May;41(5):499–511. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edwards M. S., Sternberg J. E., Thornton J. M. Structural and sequence patterns in the loops of beta alpha beta units. Protein Eng. 1987 Jun;1(3):173–181. doi: 10.1093/protein/1.3.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Efimov A. V. Standard structures in proteins. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1993;60(3):201–239. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(93)90015-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Greer J. Model for haptoglobin heavy chain based upon structural homology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jun;77(6):3393–3397. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.6.3393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harrison S. C. A structural taxonomy of DNA-binding domains. Nature. 1991 Oct 24;353(6346):715–719. doi: 10.1038/353715a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Harrison S. C., Aggarwal A. K. DNA recognition by proteins with the helix-turn-helix motif. Annu Rev Biochem. 1990;59:933–969. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.004441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kabsch W., Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 1983 Dec;22(12):2577–2637. doi: 10.1002/bip.360221211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kretsinger R. H. Structure and evolution of calcium-modulated proteins. CRC Crit Rev Biochem. 1980;8(2):119–174. doi: 10.3109/10409238009105467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Leszczynski J. F., Rose G. D. Loops in globular proteins: a novel category of secondary structure. Science. 1986 Nov 14;234(4778):849–855. doi: 10.1126/science.3775366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Milner-White E. J. Situations of gamma-turns in proteins. Their relation to alpha-helices, beta-sheets and ligand binding sites. J Mol Biol. 1990 Nov 20;216(2):386–397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Morris A. L., MacArthur M. W., Hutchinson E. G., Thornton J. M. Stereochemical quality of protein structure coordinates. Proteins. 1992 Apr;12(4):345–364. doi: 10.1002/prot.340120407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Muñoz V., Blanco F. J., Serrano L. The hydrophobic-staple motif and a role for loop-residues in alpha-helix stability and protein folding. Nat Struct Biol. 1995 May;2(5):380–385. doi: 10.1038/nsb0595-380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nagarajaram H. A., Sowdhamini R., Ramakrishnan C., Balaram P. Termination of right handed helices in proteins by residues in left handed helical conformations. FEBS Lett. 1993 Apr 19;321(1):79–83. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80625-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Overington J., Johnson M. S., Sali A., Blundell T. L. Tertiary structural constraints on protein evolutionary diversity: templates, key residues and structure prediction. Proc Biol Sci. 1990 Aug 22;241(1301):132–145. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1990.0077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rice P. A., Goldman A., Steitz T. A. A helix-turn-strand structural motif common in alpha-beta proteins. Proteins. 1990;8(4):334–340. doi: 10.1002/prot.340080407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rooman M. J., Rodriguez J., Wodak S. J. Automatic definition of recurrent local structure motifs in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1990 May 20;213(2):327–336. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80194-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sibanda B. L., Thornton J. M. Beta-hairpin families in globular proteins. Nature. 1985 Jul 11;316(6024):170–174. doi: 10.1038/316170a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sowdhamini R., Blundell T. L. An automatic method involving cluster analysis of secondary structures for the identification of domains in proteins. Protein Sci. 1995 Mar;4(3):506–520. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sowdhamini R., Srinivasan N., Ramakrishnan C., Balaram P. Orthogonal beta beta motifs in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1992 Feb 20;223(4):845–851. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90246-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Steitz T. A. Structural studies of protein-nucleic acid interaction: the sources of sequence-specific binding. Q Rev Biophys. 1990 Aug;23(3):205–280. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500005552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sutcliffe M. J., Haneef I., Carney D., Blundell T. L. Knowledge based modelling of homologous proteins, Part I: Three-dimensional frameworks derived from the simultaneous superposition of multiple structures. Protein Eng. 1987 Oct-Nov;1(5):377–384. doi: 10.1093/protein/1.5.377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Swindells M. B. Loopy similarities. Nat Struct Biol. 1994 Jul;1(7):421–422. doi: 10.1038/nsb0794-421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Thornton J. M., Sibanda B. L., Edwards M. S., Barlow D. J. Analysis, design and modification of loop regions in proteins. Bioessays. 1988 Feb-Mar;8(2):63–69. doi: 10.1002/bies.950080205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tramontano A., Chothia C., Lesk A. M. Structural determinants of the conformations of medium-sized loops in proteins. Proteins. 1989;6(4):382–394. doi: 10.1002/prot.340060405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wintjens R. T., Rooman M. J., Wodak S. J. Automatic classification and analysis of alpha alpha-turn motifs in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1996 Jan 12;255(1):235–253. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yura K., Tomoda S., Go M. Repeat of a helix-turn-helix module in DNA-binding proteins. Protein Eng. 1993 Aug;6(6):621–628. doi: 10.1093/protein/6.6.621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES