Skip to main content
PMC home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1996 Feb;5(2):296–309. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560050214

Structural coupling of the inhibitory regions flanking the ETS domain of murine Ets-1.

J J Skalicky 1, L W Donaldson 1, J M Petersen 1, B J Graves 1, L P McIntosh 1
PMCID: PMC2143348  PMID: 8745408

Abstract

Several members of the ets gene family of transcription factors show negative regulation of DNA binding by intramolecular interactions. A structural mechanism for this auto-inhibition is investigated using a 161-residue N-terminal deletion mutant of murine Ets-1, Ets-1 delta N280. This protein shows a similar reduced affinity for DNA as native Ets-1 because it contains the ETS domain in context of the flanking amino- and carboxy-terminal regions that together mediate repression of DNA binding. The secondary structure of Ets-1 delta N280 was determined using NMR chemical shift, NOE, J coupling, and amide hydrogen exchange information. In addition to the winged helix-turn-helix ETS domain, Ets-1 delta N280 contains two alpha-helices in the amino-terminal inhibitory region and one alpha-helix in the carboxy-terminal inhibitory region. Chemical shift comparisons were made between this protein and an activated form of Ets-1 lacking the amino-terminal inhibitory region. The spectral differences demonstrate that the amino- and carboxy-terminal inhibitory sequences are structurally coupled to one another, thus explaining the observation that both regions are required for the repression of DNA binding. Furthermore, these data show that the inhibitory sequences also interact directly with the first helix of the intervening ETS domain, thereby providing a pathway for the repression of DNA binding. These results lead to a model of an inhibitory module in Ets-1 composed of both the amino- and carboxy-terminal regions interfaced with the ETS domain. This establishes the structural framework for understanding the intramolecular inhibition of Ets-1 DNA binding.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bai Y., Milne J. S., Mayne L., Englander S. W. Primary structure effects on peptide group hydrogen exchange. Proteins. 1993 Sep;17(1):75–86. doi: 10.1002/prot.340170110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brennan R. G. The winged-helix DNA-binding motif: another helix-turn-helix takeoff. Cell. 1993 Sep 10;74(5):773–776. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90456-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark K. L., Halay E. D., Lai E., Burley S. K. Co-crystal structure of the HNF-3/fork head DNA-recognition motif resembles histone H5. Nature. 1993 Jul 29;364(6436):412–420. doi: 10.1038/364412a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dalton S., Treisman R. Characterization of SAP-1, a protein recruited by serum response factor to the c-fos serum response element. Cell. 1992 Feb 7;68(3):597–612. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90194-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Donaldson L. W., Petersen J. M., Graves B. J., McIntosh L. P. Secondary structure of the ETS domain places murine Ets-1 in the superfamily of winged helix-turn-helix DNA-binding proteins. Biochemistry. 1994 Nov 22;33(46):13509–13516. doi: 10.1021/bi00250a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edelhoch H. Spectroscopic determination of tryptophan and tyrosine in proteins. Biochemistry. 1967 Jul;6(7):1948–1954. doi: 10.1021/bi00859a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Farrow N. A., Muhandiram R., Singer A. U., Pascal S. M., Kay C. M., Gish G., Shoelson S. E., Pawson T., Forman-Kay J. D., Kay L. E. Backbone dynamics of a free and phosphopeptide-complexed Src homology 2 domain studied by 15N NMR relaxation. Biochemistry. 1994 May 17;33(19):5984–6003. doi: 10.1021/bi00185a040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fisher R. J., Fivash M., Casas-Finet J., Erickson J. W., Kondoh A., Bladen S. V., Fisher C., Watson D. K., Papas T. Real-time DNA binding measurements of the ETS1 recombinant oncoproteins reveal significant kinetic differences between the p42 and p51 isoforms. Protein Sci. 1994 Feb;3(2):257–266. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Forman-Kay J. E., Gronenborn A. M., Kay L. E., Wingfield P. T., Clore G. M. Studies on the solution conformation of human thioredoxin using heteronuclear 15N-1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 1990 Feb 13;29(6):1566–1572. doi: 10.1021/bi00458a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Giovane A., Pintzas A., Maira S. M., Sobieszczuk P., Wasylyk B. Net, a new ets transcription factor that is activated by Ras. Genes Dev. 1994 Jul 1;8(13):1502–1513. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.13.1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grimm S., Baeuerle P. A. The inducible transcription factor NF-kappa B: structure-function relationship of its protein subunits. Biochem J. 1993 Mar 1;290(Pt 2):297–308. doi: 10.1042/bj2900297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hagman J., Grosschedl R. An inhibitory carboxyl-terminal domain in Ets-1 and Ets-2 mediates differential binding of ETS family factors to promoter sequences of the mb-1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Oct 1;89(19):8889–8893. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.19.8889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hahn S. L., Wasylyk B. The oncoprotein v-Ets is less selective in DNA binding than c-Ets-1 due to the C-terminal sequence change. Oncogene. 1994 Sep;9(9):2499–2512. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hupp T. R., Meek D. W., Midgley C. A., Lane D. P. Regulation of the specific DNA binding function of p53. Cell. 1992 Nov 27;71(5):875–886. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90562-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ikura M., Kay L. E., Bax A. A novel approach for sequential assignment of 1H, 13C, and 15N spectra of proteins: heteronuclear triple-resonance three-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. Application to calmodulin. Biochemistry. 1990 May 15;29(19):4659–4667. doi: 10.1021/bi00471a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Janknecht R., Nordheim A. Gene regulation by Ets proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993 Dec 23;1155(3):346–356. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(93)90014-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Janknecht R., Zinck R., Ernst W. H., Nordheim A. Functional dissection of the transcription factor Elk-1. Oncogene. 1994 Apr;9(4):1273–1278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jorcyk C. L., Watson D. K., Mavrothalassitis G. J., Papas T. S. The human ETS1 gene: genomic structure, promoter characterization and alternative splicing. Oncogene. 1991 Apr;6(4):523–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Karim F. D., Urness L. D., Thummel C. S., Klemsz M. J., McKercher S. R., Celada A., Van Beveren C., Maki R. A., Gunther C. V., Nye J. A. The ETS-domain: a new DNA-binding motif that recognizes a purine-rich core DNA sequence. Genes Dev. 1990 Sep;4(9):1451–1453. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.9.1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kay L. E., Torchia D. A., Bax A. Backbone dynamics of proteins as studied by 15N inverse detected heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy: application to staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry. 1989 Nov 14;28(23):8972–8979. doi: 10.1021/bi00449a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kowenz-Leutz E., Twamley G., Ansieau S., Leutz A. Novel mechanism of C/EBP beta (NF-M) transcriptional control: activation through derepression. Genes Dev. 1994 Nov 15;8(22):2781–2791. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.22.2781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Leprince D., Crepieux P., Stehelin D. c-ets-1 DNA binding to the PEA3 motif is differentially inhibited by all the mutations found in v-ets. Oncogene. 1992 Jan;7(1):9–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Leprince D., Gegonne A., Coll J., de Taisne C., Schneeberger A., Lagrou C., Stehelin D. A putative second cell-derived oncogene of the avian leukaemia retrovirus E26. Nature. 1983 Nov 24;306(5941):395–397. doi: 10.1038/306395a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Liang H., Mao X., Olejniczak E. T., Nettesheim D. G., Yu L., Meadows R. P., Thompson C. B., Fesik S. W. Solution structure of the ets domain of Fli-1 when bound to DNA. Nat Struct Biol. 1994 Dec;1(12):871–875. doi: 10.1038/nsb1294-871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lieberman P. M., Schmidt M. C., Kao C. C., Berk A. J. Two distinct domains in the yeast transcription factor IID and evidence for a TATA box-induced conformational change. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jan;11(1):63–74. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.1.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lim F., Kraut N., Framptom J., Graf T. DNA binding by c-Ets-1, but not v-Ets, is repressed by an intramolecular mechanism. EMBO J. 1992 Feb;11(2):643–652. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05096.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lopez M., Oettgen P., Akbarali Y., Dendorfer U., Libermann T. A. ERP, a new member of the ets transcription factor/oncoprotein family: cloning, characterization, and differential expression during B-lymphocyte development. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 May;14(5):3292–3309. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.5.3292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Macleod K., Leprince D., Stehelin D. The ets gene family. Trends Biochem Sci. 1992 Jul;17(7):251–256. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(92)90404-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nicholls A., Sharp K. A., Honig B. Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins. 1991;11(4):281–296. doi: 10.1002/prot.340110407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nunn M. F., Hunter T. The ets sequence is required for induction of erythroblastosis in chickens by avian retrovirus E26. J Virol. 1989 Jan;63(1):398–402. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.1.398-402.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nye J. A., Petersen J. M., Gunther C. V., Jonsen M. D., Graves B. J. Interaction of murine ets-1 with GGA-binding sites establishes the ETS domain as a new DNA-binding motif. Genes Dev. 1992 Jun;6(6):975–990. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.6.975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Petersen J. M., Skalicky J. J., Donaldson L. W., McIntosh L. P., Alber T., Graves B. J. Modulation of transcription factor Ets-1 DNA binding: DNA-induced unfolding of an alpha helix. Science. 1995 Sep 29;269(5232):1866–1869. doi: 10.1126/science.7569926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rabindran S. K., Haroun R. I., Clos J., Wisniewski J., Wu C. Regulation of heat shock factor trimer formation: role of a conserved leucine zipper. Science. 1993 Jan 8;259(5092):230–234. doi: 10.1126/science.8421783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Richardson J. S. The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure. Adv Protein Chem. 1981;34:167–339. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60520-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schultz S. C., Shields G. C., Steitz T. A. Crystal structure of a CAP-DNA complex: the DNA is bent by 90 degrees. Science. 1991 Aug 30;253(5023):1001–1007. doi: 10.1126/science.1653449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wasylyk B., Hahn S. L., Giovane A. The Ets family of transcription factors. Eur J Biochem. 1993 Jan 15;211(1-2):7–18. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-78757-7_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wasylyk C., Kerckaert J. P., Wasylyk B. A novel modulator domain of Ets transcription factors. Genes Dev. 1992 Jun;6(6):965–974. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.6.965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Watson D. K., McWilliams M. J., Lapis P., Lautenberger J. A., Schweinfest C. W., Papas T. S. Mammalian ets-1 and ets-2 genes encode highly conserved proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(21):7862–7866. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.21.7862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Werner M. H., Clore M., Fisher C. L., Fisher R. J., Trinh L., Shiloach J., Gronenborn A. M. The solution structure of the human ETS1-DNA complex reveals a novel mode of binding and true side chain intercalation. Cell. 1995 Dec 1;83(5):761–771. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90189-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Williams S. C., Baer M., Dillner A. J., Johnson P. F. CRP2 (C/EBP beta) contains a bipartite regulatory domain that controls transcriptional activation, DNA binding and cell specificity. EMBO J. 1995 Jul 3;14(13):3170–3183. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07319.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wishart D. S., Sykes B. D. The 13C chemical-shift index: a simple method for the identification of protein secondary structure using 13C chemical-shift data. J Biomol NMR. 1994 Mar;4(2):171–180. doi: 10.1007/BF00175245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang O., Kay L. E., Olivier J. P., Forman-Kay J. D. Backbone 1H and 15N resonance assignments of the N-terminal SH3 domain of drk in folded and unfolded states using enhanced-sensitivity pulsed field gradient NMR techniques. J Biomol NMR. 1994 Nov;4(6):845–858. doi: 10.1007/BF00398413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES