Skip to main content
PMC home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1996 Aug;5(8):1676–1686. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560050821

Hydrophobic regions on protein surfaces. Derivation of the solvation energy from their area distribution in crystallographic protein structures.

F Eisenhaber 1
PMCID: PMC2143472  PMID: 8844856

Abstract

For the first time, a direct approach for the derivation of an atomic solvation parameter from macromolecular structural data alone is presented. The specific free energy of solvation for hydrophobic surface regions of proteins is delineated from the area distribution of hydrophobic surface patches. The resulting value is 18 cal/(mol.A2), with a statistical uncertainty of +/-2 cal/mol.A2) at the 5% significance level. It compares favorably with the parameters for carbon obtained by other authors who use the the crystal geometry of succinic acid or energies of transfer from hydrophobic solvent to water for small organic compounds. Thus, the transferability of atomic solvation parameters for hydrophobic atoms to macromolecules has been directly demonstrated. A careful statistical analysis demonstrates that surface energy parameters derived from thermodynamic data of protein mutation experiments are clearly less confident.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Argos P. An investigation of protein subunit and domain interfaces. Protein Eng. 1988 Jul;2(2):101–113. doi: 10.1093/protein/2.2.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernstein F. C., Koetzle T. F., Williams G. J., Meyer E. F., Jr, Brice M. D., Rodgers J. R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol. 1977 May 25;112(3):535–542. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blaber M., Zhang X. J., Lindstrom J. D., Pepiot S. D., Baase W. A., Matthews B. W. Determination of alpha-helix propensity within the context of a folded protein. Sites 44 and 131 in bacteriophage T4 lysozyme. J Mol Biol. 1994 Jan 14;235(2):600–624. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blaber M., Zhang X. J., Matthews B. W. Structural basis of amino acid alpha helix propensity. Science. 1993 Jun 11;260(5114):1637–1640. doi: 10.1126/science.8503008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bryant S. H., Lawrence C. E. The frequency of ion-pair substructures in proteins is quantitatively related to electrostatic potential: a statistical model for nonbonded interactions. Proteins. 1991;9(2):108–119. doi: 10.1002/prot.340090205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Casari G., Sippl M. J. Structure-derived hydrophobic potential. Hydrophobic potential derived from X-ray structures of globular proteins is able to identify native folds. J Mol Biol. 1992 Apr 5;224(3):725–732. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90556-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cañada F. J., Law W. C., Rando R. R., Yamamoto T., Derguini F., Nakanishi K. Substrate specificities and mechanism in the enzymatic processing of vitamin A into 11-cis-retinol. Biochemistry. 1990 Oct 16;29(41):9690–9697. doi: 10.1021/bi00493a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chothia C. Hydrophobic bonding and accessible surface area in proteins. Nature. 1974 Mar 22;248(446):338–339. doi: 10.1038/248338a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chothia C. The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1976 Jul 25;105(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90191-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Covell D. G., Smythers G. W., Gronenborn A. M., Clore G. M. Analysis of hydrophobicity in the alpha and beta chemokine families and its relevance to dimerization. Protein Sci. 1994 Nov;3(11):2064–2072. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560031119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Crippen G. M., Viswanadhan V. N. Sidechain and backbone potential function for conformational analysis of proteins. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1985 May;25(5):487–509. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1985.tb02203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eisenberg D., McLachlan A. D. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature. 1986 Jan 16;319(6050):199–203. doi: 10.1038/319199a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Eriksson A. E., Baase W. A., Matthews B. W. Similar hydrophobic replacements of Leu99 and Phe153 within the core of T4 lysozyme have different structural and thermodynamic consequences. J Mol Biol. 1993 Feb 5;229(3):747–769. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eriksson A. E., Baase W. A., Zhang X. J., Heinz D. W., Blaber M., Baldwin E. P., Matthews B. W. Response of a protein structure to cavity-creating mutations and its relation to the hydrophobic effect. Science. 1992 Jan 10;255(5041):178–183. doi: 10.1126/science.1553543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Finkelstein A. V., Badretdinov AYa, Gutin A. M. Why do protein architectures have Boltzmann-like statistics? Proteins. 1995 Oct;23(2):142–150. doi: 10.1002/prot.340230204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Finkelstein A. V., Gutin A. M., Badretdinov A. Y. Perfect temperature for protein structure prediction and folding. Proteins. 1995 Oct;23(2):151–162. doi: 10.1002/prot.340230205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Harvey S. C. Treatment of electrostatic effects in macromolecular modeling. Proteins. 1989;5(1):78–92. doi: 10.1002/prot.340050109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Heringa J., Sommerfeldt H., Higgins D., Argos P. OBSTRUCT: a program to obtain largest cliques from a protein sequence set according to structural resolution and sequence similarity. Comput Appl Biosci. 1992 Dec;8(6):599–600. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/8.6.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hermann R. B. Use of solvent cavity area and number of packed solvent molecules around a solute in regard to hydrocarbon solubilities and hydrophobic interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Oct;74(10):4144–4145. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.10.4144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Holtzer A. Does Flory-Huggins theory help in interpreting solute partitioning experiments? Biopolymers. 1994 Mar;34(3):315–320. doi: 10.1002/bip.360340303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Holtzer A. The use of Flory-Huggins theory in interpreting partitioning of solutes between organic liquids and water. Biopolymers. 1992 Jun;32(6):711–715. doi: 10.1002/bip.360320611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Honig B., Yang A. S. Free energy balance in protein folding. Adv Protein Chem. 1995;46:27–58. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60331-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hubbard S. J., Gross K. H., Argos P. Intramolecular cavities in globular proteins. Protein Eng. 1994 May;7(5):613–626. doi: 10.1093/protein/7.5.613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jackson R. M., Sternberg M. J. A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: application to the docking problem. J Mol Biol. 1995 Jul 7;250(2):258–275. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jackson R. M., Sternberg M. J. Application of scaled particle theory to model the hydrophobic effect: implications for molecular association and protein stability. Protein Eng. 1994 Mar;7(3):371–383. doi: 10.1093/protein/7.3.371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Janin J., Miller S., Chothia C. Surface, subunit interfaces and interior of oligomeric proteins. J Mol Biol. 1988 Nov 5;204(1):155–164. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90606-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Janin J., Rodier F. Protein-protein interaction at crystal contacts. Proteins. 1995 Dec;23(4):580–587. doi: 10.1002/prot.340230413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jones G., Willett P., Glen R. C. Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. J Mol Biol. 1995 Jan 6;245(1):43–53. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(95)80037-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Juffer A. H., Eisenhaber F., Hubbard S. J., Walther D., Argos P. Comparison of atomic solvation parametric sets: applicability and limitations in protein folding and binding. Protein Sci. 1995 Dec;4(12):2499–2509. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560041206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Koehl P., Delarue M. Polar and nonpolar atomic environments in the protein core: implications for folding and binding. Proteins. 1994 Nov;20(3):264–278. doi: 10.1002/prot.340200307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Komine S., Yoshida K., Yamashita H., Masaki Z. Voiding dysfunction in patients with human T-lymphotropic virus type-1-associated myelopathy (HAM). Paraplegia. 1989 Jun;27(3):217–221. doi: 10.1038/sc.1989.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Korn A. P., Burnett R. M. Distribution and complementarity of hydropathy in multisubunit proteins. Proteins. 1991;9(1):37–55. doi: 10.1002/prot.340090106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Leckband D. E., Schmitt F. J., Israelachvili J. N., Knoll W. Direct force measurements of specific and nonspecific protein interactions. Biochemistry. 1994 Apr 19;33(15):4611–4624. doi: 10.1021/bi00181a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee B., Richards F. M. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol. 1971 Feb 14;55(3):379–400. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. MacArthur M. W., Thornton J. M. Influence of proline residues on protein conformation. J Mol Biol. 1991 Mar 20;218(2):397–412. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90721-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Miller S., Janin J., Lesk A. M., Chothia C. Interior and surface of monomeric proteins. J Mol Biol. 1987 Aug 5;196(3):641–656. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90038-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Miller S. The structure of interfaces between subunits of dimeric and tetrameric proteins. Protein Eng. 1989 Nov;3(2):77–83. doi: 10.1093/protein/3.2.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Miyazawa S., Jernigan R. L. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol. 1996 Mar 1;256(3):623–644. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nicholls A., Sharp K. A., Honig B. Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins. 1991;11(4):281–296. doi: 10.1002/prot.340110407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ooi T., Oobatake M., Némethy G., Scheraga H. A. Accessible surface areas as a measure of the thermodynamic parameters of hydration of peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 May;84(10):3086–3090. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.10.3086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Phillips G. N., Jr, Pettitt B. M. Structure and dynamics of the water around myoglobin. Protein Sci. 1995 Feb;4(2):149–158. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pickett S. D., Sternberg M. J. Empirical scale of side-chain conformational entropy in protein folding. J Mol Biol. 1993 Jun 5;231(3):825–839. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pinker R. J., Lin L., Rose G. D., Kallenbach N. R. Effects of alanine substitutions in alpha-helices of sperm whale myoglobin on protein stability. Protein Sci. 1993 Jul;2(7):1099–1105. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560020704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Pohl F. M. Empirical protein energy maps. Nat New Biol. 1971 Dec 29;234(52):277–279. doi: 10.1038/newbio234277a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rashin A. A., Iofin M., Honig B. Internal cavities and buried waters in globular proteins. Biochemistry. 1986 Jun 17;25(12):3619–3625. doi: 10.1021/bi00360a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rees D. C., Wolfe G. M. Macromolecular solvation energies derived from small molecule crystal morphology. Protein Sci. 1993 Nov;2(11):1882–1889. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560021110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Reynolds J. A., Gilbert D. B., Tanford C. Empirical correlation between hydrophobic free energy and aqueous cavity surface area. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Aug;71(8):2925–2927. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.8.2925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rupley J. A., Careri G. Protein hydration and function. Adv Protein Chem. 1991;41:37–172. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60197-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sharp K. A., Nicholls A., Fine R. F., Honig B. Reconciling the magnitude of the microscopic and macroscopic hydrophobic effects. Science. 1991 Apr 5;252(5002):106–109. doi: 10.1126/science.2011744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Thomas P. D., Dill K. A. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they? J Mol Biol. 1996 Mar 29;257(2):457–469. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang Y., Zhang H., Scott R. A. A new computational model for protein folding based on atomic solvation. Protein Sci. 1995 Jul;4(7):1402–1411. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES