Skip to main content
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1997 Jan;6(1):222–232. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060124

Temperature dependence of the preferential interactions of ribonuclease A in aqueous co-solvent systems: thermodynamic analysis.

G Xie 1, S N Timasheff 1
PMCID: PMC2143519  PMID: 9007994

Abstract

The temperature dependence of preferential solvent interactions with ribonuclease A in aqueous solutions of 30% sorbitol, 0.6 M MgCl2, and 0.6 M MgSO4 at low pH (1.5 and 2.0) and high pH (5.5) has been investigated. This protein was stabilized by all three co-solvents, more so at low pH than high pH (expect 0.6 M MgCl2 at pH 5.5). The preferential hydration of protein in all three co-solvents was high at temperatures below 30 degrees C and decreased with a further increase in temperature (for 0.6 M MgCl2 at pH 5.5, this was not significant), indicating a greater thermodynamic instability at low temperature than at high temperature. The preferential hydration of denatured protein (low pH, high temperature) was always greater than that of native protein (high pH, high temperature). In 30% sorbitol, the interaction passed to preferential binding at 45% for native ribonuclease A and at 55 degrees C for the denatured protein. Availability of the temperature dependence of the variation with sorbitol concentration of the chemical potential of the protein, (delta mu(2)/delta m3)T,p,m2, permitted calculation of the corresponding enthalpy and entropy parameters. Combination with available data on sorbitol concentration dependence of this interaction parameter gave (approximate) values of the transfer enthalpy, delta H2,tr, and transfer entropy delta S2,tr. Transfer of ribonuclease A from water into 30% sorbitol is characterized by positive values of the transfer free energy, transfer enthalpy, transfer entropy, and transfer heat capacity. On denaturation, the transfer enthalpy becomes more positive. This increment, however, is small relative to both the enthalpy of unfolding in water and to the transfer enthalpy of the native protein from water a 30% sorbitol solution.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1,018.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arakawa T., Bhat R., Timasheff S. N. Why preferential hydration does not always stabilize the native structure of globular proteins. Biochemistry. 1990 Feb 20;29(7):1924–1931. doi: 10.1021/bi00459a037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arakawa T., Timasheff S. N. Protein stabilization and destabilization by guanidinium salts. Biochemistry. 1984 Dec 4;23(25):5924–5929. doi: 10.1021/bi00320a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Biltonen R., Lumry R. Studies of the chymotrypsinogen family of proteins. VII. Thermodynamic analysis of transition I of alpha-chymotrypsin. J Am Chem Soc. 1969 Jul 16;91(15):4256–4264. doi: 10.1021/ja01043a039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bull H. B., Breese K. Protein hydration. I. Binding sites. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1968 Nov;128(2):488–496. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(68)90055-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CASASSA E. F., EISENBERG H. THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF MULTICOMPONENT SOLUTIONS. Adv Protein Chem. 1964;19:287–395. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60191-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Inoue H., Timasheff S. N. Preferential and absolute interactions of solvent components with proteins in mixed solvent systems. Biopolymers. 1972;11(4):737–743. doi: 10.1002/bip.1972.360110402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kuntz I. D., Jr, Kauzmann W. Hydration of proteins and polypeptides. Adv Protein Chem. 1974;28:239–345. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60232-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee J. C., Timasheff S. N. The stabilization of proteins by sucrose. J Biol Chem. 1981 Jul 25;256(14):7193–7201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu Y., Bolen D. W. The peptide backbone plays a dominant role in protein stabilization by naturally occurring osmolytes. Biochemistry. 1995 Oct 3;34(39):12884–12891. doi: 10.1021/bi00039a051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Reisler E., Haik Y., Eisenberg H. Bovine serum albumin and aqueous guanidine hydrochloride solutions. Preferential and absolute interactions and comparison with other systems. Biochemistry. 1977 Jan 25;16(2):197–203. doi: 10.1021/bi00621a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. TIMASHEFF S. N., KRONMAN M. J. The extrapolation of light-scattering data to zero concentration. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1959 Jul;83(1):60–75. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(59)90010-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Timasheff S. N. The control of protein stability and association by weak interactions with water: how do solvents affect these processes? Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1993;22:67–97. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.22.060193.000435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Timasheff S. N. Water as ligand: preferential binding and exclusion of denaturants in protein unfolding. Biochemistry. 1992 Oct 20;31(41):9857–9864. doi: 10.1021/bi00156a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. WYMAN J., Jr LINKED FUNCTIONS AND RECIPROCAL EFFECTS IN HEMOGLOBIN: A SECOND LOOK. Adv Protein Chem. 1964;19:223–286. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60190-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Xie G., Timasheff S. N. Mechanism of the stabilization of ribonuclease A by sorbitol: preferential hydration is greater for the denatured then for the native protein. Protein Sci. 1997 Jan;6(1):211–221. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES