Skip to main content
PMC home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1996 Sep;5(9):1826–1832. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560050908

Denaturants can accelerate folding rates in a class of globular proteins.

C J Camacho 1, D Thirumalai 1
PMCID: PMC2143547  PMID: 8880906

Abstract

We present a lattice Monte Carlo study to examine the effect of denaturants on the folding rates of simplified models of proteins. The two-dimensional model is made from a three-letter code mimicking the presence of hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and cysteine residues. We show that the rate of folding is maximum when the effective hydrophobic interaction epsilon H is approximately equal to the free energy gain epsilon S upon forming disulfide bonds. In the range 1 < or = epsilon H/ epsilon S < or = 3, multiple paths that connect several intermediates to the native state lead to fast folding. It is shown that at a fixed temperature and epsilon S the folding rate increases as epsilon H decreases. An approximate model is used to show that epsilon H should decrease as a function of the concentration of denaturants such as urea or guanidine hydrochloride. Our simulation results, in conjunction with this model, are used to show that increasing the concentration of denaturants can lead to an increase in folding rates. This occurs because denaturants can destabilize the intermediates without significantly altering the energy of the native conformation. Our findings are compared with experiments on the effects of denaturants on the refolding of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor and ribonuclease T1. We also argue that the phenomenon of denaturant-enhanced folding of proteins should be general.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (791.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alonso D. O., Dill K. A. Solvent denaturation and stabilization of globular proteins. Biochemistry. 1991 Jun 18;30(24):5974–5985. doi: 10.1021/bi00238a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrick D., Baldwin R. L. Three-state analysis of sperm whale apomyoglobin folding. Biochemistry. 1993 Apr 13;32(14):3790–3796. doi: 10.1021/bi00065a035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryngelson J. D., Onuchic J. N., Socci N. D., Wolynes P. G. Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis. Proteins. 1995 Mar;21(3):167–195. doi: 10.1002/prot.340210302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Camacho C. J., Thirumalai D. Modeling the role of disulfide bonds in protein folding: entropic barriers and pathways. Proteins. 1995 May;22(1):27–40. doi: 10.1002/prot.340220105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Camacho C. J., Thirumalai D. Theoretical predictions of folding pathways by using the proximity rule, with applications to bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Feb 28;92(5):1277–1281. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.5.1277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Creighton T. E. Experimental studies of protein folding and unfolding. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1978;33(3):231–297. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(79)90030-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dill K. A., Bromberg S., Yue K., Fiebig K. M., Yee D. P., Thomas P. D., Chan H. S. Principles of protein folding--a perspective from simple exact models. Protein Sci. 1995 Apr;4(4):561–602. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Greene R. F., Jr, Pace C. N. Urea and guanidine hydrochloride denaturation of ribonuclease, lysozyme, alpha-chymotrypsin, and beta-lactoglobulin. J Biol Chem. 1974 Sep 10;249(17):5388–5393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kelley R. F., Wilson J., Bryant C., Stellwagen E. Effects of guanidine hydrochloride on the refolding kinetics of denatured thioredoxin. Biochemistry. 1986 Feb 11;25(3):728–732. doi: 10.1021/bi00351a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kiefhaber T., Grunert H. P., Hahn U., Schmid F. X. Folding of RNase T1 is decelerated by a specific tertiary contact in a folding intermediate. Proteins. 1992 Feb;12(2):171–179. doi: 10.1002/prot.340120210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McCoy L. F., Jr, Rowe E. S., Wong K. P. Multiparameter kinetic study on the unfolding and refolding of bovine carbonic anhydrase B. Biochemistry. 1980 Oct 14;19(21):4738–4743. doi: 10.1021/bi00562a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schmid F. X., Grafl R., Wrba A., Beintema J. J. Role of proline peptide bond isomerization in unfolding and refolding of ribonuclease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Feb;83(4):872–876. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.4.872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shortle D., Chan H. S., Dill K. A. Modeling the effects of mutations on the denatured states of proteins. Protein Sci. 1992 Feb;1(2):201–215. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560010202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Weissman J. S., Kim P. S. Reexamination of the folding of BPTI: predominance of native intermediates. Science. 1991 Sep 20;253(5026):1386–1393. doi: 10.1126/science.1716783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES