Skip to main content
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1997 Dec;6(12):2561–2567. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560061208

Analysis of temperature factor distribution in high-resolution protein structures.

S Parthasarathy 1, M R Murthy 1
PMCID: PMC2143610  PMID: 9416605

Abstract

The temperature factors obtained from X-ray refinement of proteins at high resolution show large variations from one structure to another. However, the B-values expressed in units of standard deviation about their mean value (B'-factor) at the C alpha atoms show remarkably characteristic frequency distribution. In all of the 110 proteins examined in this study, the frequency distribution exhibited a bimodal distribution. The peaks in the B'-factor frequency distribution occur at -1.1 and 0.4 for a bin size of 0.5. The peak at lower temperature factor corresponds largely to buried residues, whereas the peak at larger value corresponds to exposed residues. The distribution could be accurately described as a superposition of two Gaussian functions. The parameters describing the distribution are therefore characteristic of protein structures. The frequency distribution for a given amino acid over all the proteins also shows a similar bimodal distribution, although the areas under the two Gaussians differ from one amino acid to another. The area under the frequency distribution curve for any interval in B'-factor represents the propensity of the amino acid to occur in that interval. This propensity is related both to the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the residue and the tendency of the residue to impose a different degree of rigidity on the polypeptide chain. The frequency distribution of stretches of high B'-factors departs appreciably from that expected for a random distribution. The correlation in the B-values of sequentially proximal residues is probably responsible for the bimodal distribution.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (466.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernstein F. C., Koetzle T. F., Williams G. J., Meyer E. F., Jr, Brice M. D., Rodgers J. R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol. 1977 May 25;112(3):535–542. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowie J. U., Lüthy R., Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science. 1991 Jul 12;253(5016):164–170. doi: 10.1126/science.1853201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chou P. Y., Fasman G. D. Prediction of protein conformation. Biochemistry. 1974 Jan 15;13(2):222–245. doi: 10.1021/bi00699a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hobohm U., Sander C. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci. 1994 Mar;3(3):522–524. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ippolito J. A., Alexander R. S., Christianson D. W. Hydrogen bond stereochemistry in protein structure and function. J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):457–471. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80364-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Janin J. Surface and inside volumes in globular proteins. Nature. 1979 Feb 8;277(5696):491–492. doi: 10.1038/277491a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee B., Richards F. M. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol. 1971 Feb 14;55(3):379–400. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lüthy R., Bowie J. U., Eisenberg D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature. 1992 Mar 5;356(6364):83–85. doi: 10.1038/356083a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lüthy R., McLachlan A. D., Eisenberg D. Secondary structure-based profiles: use of structure-conserving scoring tables in searching protein sequence databases for structural similarities. Proteins. 1991;10(3):229–239. doi: 10.1002/prot.340100307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ragone R., Facchiano F., Facchiano A., Facchiano A. M., Colonna G. Flexibility plot of proteins. Protein Eng. 1989 May;2(7):497–504. doi: 10.1093/protein/2.7.497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Taylor W. R., Thornton J. M. Prediction of super-secondary structure in proteins. Nature. 1983 Feb 10;301(5900):540–542. doi: 10.1038/301540a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Thanki N., Umrania Y., Thornton J. M., Goodfellow J. M. Analysis of protein main-chain solvation as a function of secondary structure. J Mol Biol. 1991 Sep 20;221(2):669–691. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)80080-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Vihinen M., Torkkila E., Riikonen P. Accuracy of protein flexibility predictions. Proteins. 1994 Jun;19(2):141–149. doi: 10.1002/prot.340190207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES