Skip to main content
PMC home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1997 Mar;6(3):524–533. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060302

Automatic identification and representation of protein binding sites for molecular docking.

J Ruppert 1, W Welch 1, A N Jain 1
PMCID: PMC2143670  PMID: 9070435

Abstract

Molecular docking is a popular way to screen for novel drug compounds. The method involves aligning small molecules to a protein structure and estimating their binding affinity. To do this rapidly for tens of thousands of molecules requires an effective representation of the binding region of the target protein. This paper presents an algorithm for representing a protein's binding site in a way that is specifically suited to molecular docking applications. Initially the protein's surface is coated with a collection of molecular fragments that could potentially interact with the protein. Each fragment, or probe, serves as a potential alignment point for atoms in a ligand, and is scored to represent that probe's affinity for the protein. Probes are then clustered by accumulating their affinities, where high affinity clusters are identified as being the "stickiest" portions of the protein surface. The stickiest cluster is used as a computational binding "pocket" for docking. This method of site identification was tested on a number of ligand-protein complexes; in each case the pocket constructed by the algorithm coincided with the known ligand binding site. Successful docking experiments demonstrated the effectiveness of the probe representation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (8.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bolin J. T., Filman D. J., Matthews D. A., Hamlin R. C., Kraut J. Crystal structures of Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus casei dihydrofolate reductase refined at 1.7 A resolution. I. General features and binding of methotrexate. J Biol Chem. 1982 Nov 25;257(22):13650–13662. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Böhm H. J. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1994 Jun;8(3):243–256. doi: 10.1007/BF00126743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gehlhaar D. K., Verkhivker G. M., Rejto P. A., Sherman C. J., Fogel D. B., Fogel L. J., Freer S. T. Molecular recognition of the inhibitor AG-1343 by HIV-1 protease: conformationally flexible docking by evolutionary programming. Chem Biol. 1995 May;2(5):317–324. doi: 10.1016/1074-5521(95)90050-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goodford P. J. A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. J Med Chem. 1985 Jul;28(7):849–857. doi: 10.1021/jm00145a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jain A. N. Scoring noncovalent protein-ligand interactions: a continuous differentiable function tuned to compute binding affinities. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1996 Oct;10(5):427–440. doi: 10.1007/BF00124474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jiang F., Kim S. H. "Soft docking": matching of molecular surface cubes. J Mol Biol. 1991 May 5;219(1):79–102. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90859-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lin S. L., Nussinov R., Fischer D., Wolfson H. J. Molecular surface representations by sparse critical points. Proteins. 1994 Jan;18(1):94–101. doi: 10.1002/prot.340180111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Miller M. D., Kearsley S. K., Underwood D. J., Sheridan R. P. FLOG: a system to select 'quasi-flexible' ligands complementary to a receptor of known three-dimensional structure. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1994 Apr;8(2):153–174. doi: 10.1007/BF00119865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rarey M., Kramer B., Lengauer T. Time-efficient docking of flexible ligands into active sites of proteins. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol. 1995;3:300–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shoichet B. K., Kuntz I. D. Matching chemistry and shape in molecular docking. Protein Eng. 1993 Sep;6(7):723–732. doi: 10.1093/protein/6.7.723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shoichet B. K., Kuntz I. D. Protein docking and complementarity. J Mol Biol. 1991 Sep 5;221(1):327–346. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)80222-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Welch W., Ruppert J., Jain A. N. Hammerhead: fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein binding sites. Chem Biol. 1996 Jun;3(6):449–462. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(96)90093-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES