Skip to main content
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1997 Jun;6(6):1358–1366. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060627

How protein chemists learned about the hydrophobic factor.

C Tanford 1
PMCID: PMC2143727  PMID: 9194199

Abstract

It is generally accepted today that the hydrophobic force is the dominant energetic factor that leads to the folding of polypeptide chains into compact globular entities. This principle was first explicitly introduced to protein chemists in 1938 by Irving Langmuir, past master in the application of hydrophobicity to other problems, and was enthusiastically endorsed by J.D. Bernal. But both proposal and endorsement came in the course of a debate about a quite different structural principle, the so-called "cyclol hypothesis" proposed by D. Wrinch, which soon proved to be theoretically and experimentally unsupportable. Being a more tangible idea, directly expressed in structural terms, the cyclol hypothesis received more attention than the hydrophobic principle and the latter never actually entered the mainstream of protein science until 1959, when it was thrust into the limelight in a lucid review by W. Kauzmann. A theoretical paper by H.S. Frank and M. Evans, not itself related to protein folding, probably played a major role in the acceptance of the hydrophobicity concept by protein chemists because it provided a crude but tangible picture of the origin of hydrophobicity per se in terms of water structure.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Edsall J. T. Isidor Traube: physical chemist, biochemist, colloid chemist and controversialist. Proc Am Philos Soc. 1985 Dec;129(4):371–406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Edsall J. T. Memories of early days in protein science, 1926-1940. Protein Sci. 1992 Nov;1(11):1526–1530. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560011114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mirsky A. E., Pauling L. On the Structure of Native, Denatured, and Coagulated Proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1936 Jul;22(7):439–447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.22.7.439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. WAUGH D. F. Protein-protein interactions. Adv Protein Chem. 1954;9:325–437. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60210-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES