Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1999 Oct;8(10):2166–2176. doi: 10.1110/ps.8.10.2166

Cooperative effects of potassium, magnesium, and magnesium-ADP on the release of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase from the chaperonin GroEL.

A C Clark 1, B S Karon 1, C Frieden 1
PMCID: PMC2144136  PMID: 10548063

Abstract

Previous investigation has shown that at 22 degrees C and in the presence of the chaperonin GroEL, the slowest step in the refolding of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase (EcDHFR) reflects release of a late folding intermediate from the cavity of GroEL (Clark AC, Frieden C, 1997, J Mol Biol 268:512-525). In this paper, we investigate the effects of potassium, magnesium, and MgADP on the release of the EcDHFR late folding intermediate from GroEL. The data demonstrate that GroEL consists of at least two conformational states, with apparent rate constants for EcDHFR release that differ by four- to fivefold. In the absence of potassium, magnesium, and ADP, approximately 80-90% of GroEL resides in the form with the faster rate of release. Magnesium and potassium both shift the distribution of GroEL forms toward the form with the slower release rate, though cooperativity for the magnesium-induced transition is observed only in the presence of potassium. MgADP at low concentrations (0-50 microM) shifts the distribution of GroEL forms toward the form with the faster release rate, and this effect is also potassium dependent. Nearly identical results were obtained with a GroEL mutant that forms only a single ring, demonstrating that these effects occur within a single toroid of GroEL. In the presence of saturating magnesium, potassium, and MgADP, the apparent rate constant for the release of EcDHFR from wild-type GroEL at 22 degrees C reaches a limiting value of 0.014 s(-1). For the single ring mutant of GroEL, the rate of EcDHFR release under the same conditions reaches a limiting value of 0.024 s(-1), suggesting that inter-ring negative cooperativity exists for MgADP-induced substrate release. The data suggest that MgADP preferentially binds to one conformation of GroEL, that with the faster apparent rate constant for EcDHFR release, and induces a conformational change leading to more rapid release of substrate protein.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (334.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahrweiler P. M., Frieden C. Effects of point mutations in a hinge region on the stability, folding, and enzymatic activity of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase. Biochemistry. 1991 Aug 6;30(31):7801–7809. doi: 10.1021/bi00245a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Azem A., Diamant S., Goloubinoff P. Effect of divalent cations on the molecular structure of the GroEL oligomer. Biochemistry. 1994 May 31;33(21):6671–6675. doi: 10.1021/bi00187a037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Braig K., Otwinowski Z., Hegde R., Boisvert D. C., Joachimiak A., Horwich A. L., Sigler P. B. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A. Nature. 1994 Oct 13;371(6498):578–586. doi: 10.1038/371578a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cayley P. J., Dunn S. M., King R. W. Kinetics of substrate, coenzyme, and inhibitor binding to Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase. Biochemistry. 1981 Feb 17;20(4):874–879. doi: 10.1021/bi00507a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark A. C., Frieden C. GroEL-mediated folding of structurally homologous dihydrofolate reductases. J Mol Biol. 1997 May 2;268(2):512–525. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark A. C., Frieden C. Native Escherichia coli and murine dihydrofolate reductases contain late-folding non-native structures. J Mol Biol. 1999 Jan 29;285(4):1765–1776. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark A. C., Frieden C. The chaperonin GroEL binds to late-folding non-native conformations present in native Escherichia coli and murine dihydrofolate reductases. J Mol Biol. 1999 Jan 29;285(4):1777–1788. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Clark A. C., Hugo E., Frieden C. Determination of regions in the dihydrofolate reductase structure that interact with the molecular chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry. 1996 May 7;35(18):5893–5901. doi: 10.1021/bi953051v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Clark A. C., Ramanathan R., Frieden C. Purification of GroEL with low fluorescence background. Methods Enzymol. 1998;290:100–118. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(98)90010-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Diamant S., Azem A., Weiss C., Goloubinoff P. Effect of free and ATP-bound magnesium and manganese ions on the ATPase activity of chaperonin GroEL14. Biochemistry. 1995 Jan 10;34(1):273–277. doi: 10.1021/bi00001a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dunn S. M., Batchelor J. G., King R. W. Kinetics of ligand binding to dihydrofolate reductase: binary complex formation with NADPH and coenzyme analogues. Biochemistry. 1978 Jun 13;17(12):2356–2364. doi: 10.1021/bi00605a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. GroEL-mediated protein folding. Protein Sci. 1997 Apr;6(4):743–760. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fisher M. T. Promotion of the in vitro renaturation of dodecameric glutamine synthetase from Escherichia coli in the presence of GroEL (chaperonin-60) and ATP. Biochemistry. 1992 Apr 28;31(16):3955–3963. doi: 10.1021/bi00131a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Frieden C., Clark A. C. Protein folding: how the mechanism of GroEL action is defined by kinetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 May 27;94(11):5535–5538. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.11.5535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Frieden C. Refolding of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase: sequential formation of substrate binding sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(12):4413–4416. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gibbons D. L., Horowitz P. M. Ligand-induced conformational changes in the apical domain of the chaperonin GroEL. J Biol Chem. 1996 Jan 5;271(1):238–243. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.1.238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hayer-Hartl M. K., Weber F., Hartl F. U. Mechanism of chaperonin action: GroES binding and release can drive GroEL-mediated protein folding in the absence of ATP hydrolysis. EMBO J. 1996 Nov 15;15(22):6111–6121. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hendrix R. W. Purification and properties of groE, a host protein involved in bacteriophage assembly. J Mol Biol. 1979 Apr 15;129(3):375–392. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90502-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoeltzli S. D., Frieden C. 19F NMR spectroscopy of [6-19F]tryptophan-labeled Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase: equilibrium folding and ligand binding studies. Biochemistry. 1994 May 10;33(18):5502–5509. doi: 10.1021/bi00184a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jackson G. S., Staniforth R. A., Halsall D. J., Atkinson T., Holbrook J. J., Clarke A. R., Burston S. G. Binding and hydrolysis of nucleotides in the chaperonin catalytic cycle: implications for the mechanism of assisted protein folding. Biochemistry. 1993 Mar 16;32(10):2554–2563. doi: 10.1021/bi00061a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lin Z., Eisenstein E. Nucleotide binding-promoted conformational changes release a nonnative polypeptide from the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Mar 5;93(5):1977–1981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.5.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Llorca O., Pérez-Pérez J., Carrascosa J. L., Galán A., Muga A., Valpuesta J. M. Effects of the inter-ring communication in GroEL structural and functional asymmetry. J Biol Chem. 1997 Dec 26;272(52):32925–32932. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.52.32925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Penner M. H., Frieden C. Kinetic analysis of the mechanism of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase. J Biol Chem. 1987 Nov 25;262(33):15908–15914. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rye H. S., Burston S. G., Fenton W. A., Beechem J. M., Xu Z., Sigler P. B., Horwich A. L. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature. 1997 Aug 21;388(6644):792–798. doi: 10.1038/42047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sigler P. B., Xu Z., Rye H. S., Burston S. G., Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:581–608. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Todd M. J., Viitanen P. V., Lorimer G. H. Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. Science. 1994 Jul 29;265(5172):659–666. doi: 10.1126/science.7913555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Todd M. J., Viitanen P. V., Lorimer G. H. Hydrolysis of adenosine 5'-triphosphate by Escherichia coli GroEL: effects of GroES and potassium ion. Biochemistry. 1993 Aug 24;32(33):8560–8567. doi: 10.1021/bi00084a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Touchette N. A., Perry K. M., Matthews C. R. Folding of dihydrofolate reductase from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 1986 Sep 23;25(19):5445–5452. doi: 10.1021/bi00367a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Viitanen P. V., Lubben T. H., Reed J., Goloubinoff P., O'Keefe D. P., Lorimer G. H. Chaperonin-facilitated refolding of ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase and ATP hydrolysis by chaperonin 60 (groEL) are K+ dependent. Biochemistry. 1990 Jun 19;29(24):5665–5671. doi: 10.1021/bi00476a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Weissman J. S., Hohl C. M., Kovalenko O., Kashi Y., Chen S., Braig K., Saibil H. R., Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell. 1995 Nov 17;83(4):577–587. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90098-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Weissman J. S., Rye H. S., Fenton W. A., Beechem J. M., Horwich A. L. Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell. 1996 Feb 9;84(3):481–490. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81293-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Allosteric control by ATP of non-folded protein binding to GroEL. J Mol Biol. 1996 Jan 26;255(3):356–361. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry. 1995 Apr 25;34(16):5303–5308. doi: 10.1021/bi00016a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Transient kinetic analysis of adenosine 5'-triphosphate binding-induced conformational changes in the allosteric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry. 1998 May 19;37(20):7083–7088. doi: 10.1021/bi980370o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES