Skip to main content
PMC home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1998 Sep;7(9):1875–1883. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560070904

Conversion of a beta-strand to an alpha-helix induced by a single-site mutation observed in the crystal structure of Fis mutant Pro26Ala.

W Z Yang 1, T P Ko 1, L Corselli 1, R C Johnson 1, H S Yuan 1
PMCID: PMC2144158  PMID: 9761469

Abstract

The conversion from an alpha-helix to a beta-strand has received extensive attention since this structural change may induce many amyloidogenic proteins to self-assemble into fibrils and cause fatal diseases. Here we report the conversion of a peptide segment from a beta-strand to an alpha-helix by a single-site mutation as observed in the crystal structure of Fis mutant Pro26Ala determined at 2.0 A resolution. Pro26 in Fis occurs at the point where a flexible extended beta-hairpin arm leaves the core structure. Thus it can be classified as a "hinge proline" located at the C-terminal end of the beta2-strand and the N-terminal cap of the A alpha-helix. The replacement of Pro26 to alanine extends the A alpha-helix for two additional turns in one of the dimeric subunits; therefore, the structure of the peptide from residues 22 to 26 is converted from a beta-strand to an alpha-helix. This result confirms the structural importance of the proline residue located at the hinge region and may explain the mutant's reduced ability to activate Hin-catalyzed DNA inversion. The peptide (residues 20 to 26) in the second monomer subunit presumably retains its beta-strand conformation in the crystal; therefore, this peptide shows a "chameleon-like" character since it can adopt either an alpha-helix or a beta-strand structure in different environments. The structure of Pro26Ala provides an additional example where not only the protein sequence, but also non-local interactions determine the secondary structure of proteins.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abel K., Yoder M. D., Hilgenfeld R., Jurnak F. An alpha to beta conformational switch in EF-Tu. Structure. 1996 Oct 15;4(10):1153–1159. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(96)00123-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergdoll M., Remy M. H., Cagnon C., Masson J. M., Dumas P. Proline-dependent oligomerization with arm exchange. Structure. 1997 Mar 15;5(3):391–401. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(97)00196-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blaber M., Zhang X. J., Matthews B. W. Structural basis of amino acid alpha helix propensity. Science. 1993 Jun 11;260(5114):1637–1640. doi: 10.1126/science.8503008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doig A. J., Baldwin R. L. N- and C-capping preferences for all 20 amino acids in alpha-helical peptides. Protein Sci. 1995 Jul;4(7):1325–1336. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Doig A. J., MacArthur M. W., Stapley B. J., Thornton J. M. Structures of N-termini of helices in proteins. Protein Sci. 1997 Jan;6(1):147–155. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Finkel S. E., Johnson R. C. The Fis protein: it's not just for DNA inversion anymore. Mol Microbiol. 1992 Nov;6(22):3257–3265. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb02193.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harrison P. M., Bamborough P., Daggett V., Prusiner S. B., Cohen F. E. The prion folding problem. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1997 Feb;7(1):53–59. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80007-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heichman K. A., Johnson R. C. The Hin invertasome: protein-mediated joining of distant recombination sites at the enhancer. Science. 1990 Aug 3;249(4968):511–517. doi: 10.1126/science.2166334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jasanoff A., Fersht A. R. Quantitative determination of helical propensities from trifluoroethanol titration curves. Biochemistry. 1994 Mar 1;33(8):2129–2135. doi: 10.1021/bi00174a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Johnson R. C., Bruist M. F., Simon M. I. Host protein requirements for in vitro site-specific DNA inversion. Cell. 1986 Aug 15;46(4):531–539. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90878-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Johnson R. C. Mechanism of site-specific DNA inversion in bacteria. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1991 Oct;1(3):404–411. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80307-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kelly J. W. Alternative conformations of amyloidogenic proteins govern their behavior. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1996 Feb;6(1):11–17. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(96)80089-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Koch C., Kahmann R. Purification and properties of the Escherichia coli host factor required for inversion of the G segment in bacteriophage Mu. J Biol Chem. 1986 Nov 25;261(33):15673–15678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Koch C., Ninnemann O., Fuss H., Kahmann R. The N-terminal part of the E.coli DNA binding protein FIS is essential for stimulating site-specific DNA inversion but is not required for specific DNA binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Nov 11;19(21):5915–5922. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.21.5915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kostrewa D., Granzin J., Koch C., Choe H. W., Raghunathan S., Wolf W., Labahn J., Kahmann R., Saenger W. Three-dimensional structure of the E. coli DNA-binding protein FIS. Nature. 1991 Jan 10;349(6305):178–180. doi: 10.1038/349178a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kostrewa D., Granzin J., Stock D., Choe H. W., Labahn J., Saenger W. Crystal structure of the factor for inversion stimulation FIS at 2.0 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1992 Jul 5;226(1):209–226. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90134-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Luo P., Baldwin R. L. Mechanism of helix induction by trifluoroethanol: a framework for extrapolating the helix-forming properties of peptides from trifluoroethanol/water mixtures back to water. Biochemistry. 1997 Jul 8;36(27):8413–8421. doi: 10.1021/bi9707133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Minor D. L., Jr, Kim P. S. Context is a major determinant of beta-sheet propensity. Nature. 1994 Sep 15;371(6494):264–267. doi: 10.1038/371264a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Minor D. L., Jr, Kim P. S. Context-dependent secondary structure formation of a designed protein sequence. Nature. 1996 Apr 25;380(6576):730–734. doi: 10.1038/380730a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. O'Neil K. T., DeGrado W. F. A thermodynamic scale for the helix-forming tendencies of the commonly occurring amino acids. Science. 1990 Nov 2;250(4981):646–651. doi: 10.1126/science.2237415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Osuna R., Finkel S. E., Johnson R. C. Identification of two functional regions in Fis: the N-terminus is required to promote Hin-mediated DNA inversion but not lambda excision. EMBO J. 1991 Jun;10(6):1593–1603. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07680.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pan C. Q., Finkel S. E., Cramton S. E., Feng J. A., Sigman D. S., Johnson R. C. Variable structures of Fis-DNA complexes determined by flanking DNA-protein contacts. J Mol Biol. 1996 Dec 13;264(4):675–695. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Prusiner S. B. Molecular biology and genetics of prion diseases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Mar 29;343(1306):447–463. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Richardson J. S., Richardson D. C. Amino acid preferences for specific locations at the ends of alpha helices. Science. 1988 Jun 17;240(4859):1648–1652. doi: 10.1126/science.3381086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Riek R., Hornemann S., Wider G., Billeter M., Glockshuber R., Wüthrich K. NMR structure of the mouse prion protein domain PrP(121-231). Nature. 1996 Jul 11;382(6587):180–182. doi: 10.1038/382180a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Safo M. K., Yang W. Z., Corselli L., Cramton S. E., Yuan H. S., Johnson R. C. The transactivation region of the fis protein that controls site-specific DNA inversion contains extended mobile beta-hairpin arms. EMBO J. 1997 Nov 17;16(22):6860–6873. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.22.6860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Xiong H., Buckwalter B. L., Shieh H. M., Hecht M. H. Periodicity of polar and nonpolar amino acids is the major determinant of secondary structure in self-assembling oligomeric peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 3;92(14):6349–6353. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.14.6349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Xu J., Johnson R. C. aldB, an RpoS-dependent gene in Escherichia coli encoding an aldehyde dehydrogenase that is repressed by Fis and activated by Crp. J Bacteriol. 1995 Jun;177(11):3166–3175. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.11.3166-3175.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yuan H. S., Finkel S. E., Feng J. A., Kaczor-Grzeskowiak M., Johnson R. C., Dickerson R. E. The molecular structure of wild-type and a mutant Fis protein: relationship between mutational changes and recombinational enhancer function or DNA binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 1;88(21):9558–9562. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yuan H. S., Wang S. S., Yang W. Z., Finkel S. E., Johnson R. C. The structure of Fis mutant Pro61Ala illustrates that the kink within the long alpha-helix is not due to the presence of the proline residue. J Biol Chem. 1994 Nov 18;269(46):28947–28954. doi: 10.2210/pdb1fip/pdb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES