Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1999 Dec;8(12):2621–2629. doi: 10.1110/ps.8.12.2621

Structural determinants of trypsin affinity and specificity for cationic inhibitors.

F Polticelli 1, P Ascenzi 1, M Bolognesi 1, B Honig 1
PMCID: PMC2144217  PMID: 10631977

Abstract

The binding free energies of four inhibitors to bovine beta-trypsin are calculated. The inhibitors use either ornithine, lysine, or arginine to bind to the S1 specificity site. The electrostatic contribution to binding free energy is calculated by solving the finite difference Poisson-Boltzmann equation, the contribution of nonpolar interactions is calculated using a free energy-surface area relationship and the loss of conformational entropy is estimated both for trypsin and ligand side chains. Binding free energy values are of a reasonable magnitude and the relative affinity of the four inhibitors for trypsin is correctly predicted. Electrostatic interactions are found to oppose binding in all cases. However, in the case of ornithine- and lysine-based inhibitors, the salt bridge formed between their charged group and the partially buried carboxylate of Asp189 is found to stabilize the complex. Our analysis reveals how the molecular architecture of the trypsin binding site results in highly specific recognition of substrates and inhibitors. Specifically, partially burying Asp189 in the inhibitor-free enzyme decreases the penalty for desolvation of this group upon complexation. Water molecules trapped in the binding interface further stabilize the buried ion pair, resulting in a favorable electrostatic contribution of the ion pair formed with ornithine and lysine side chains. Moreover, all side chains that form the trypsin specificity site are partially buried, and hence, relatively immobile in the inhibitor-free state, thus reducing the entropic cost of complexation. The implications of the results for the general problem of recognition and binding are considered. A novel finding in this regard is that like charged molecules can have electrostatic contributions to binding that are more favorable than oppositely charged molecules due to enhanced interactions with the solvent in the highly charged complex that is formed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andrews P. R., Craik D. J., Martin J. L. Functional group contributions to drug-receptor interactions. J Med Chem. 1984 Dec;27(12):1648–1657. doi: 10.1021/jm00378a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ascenzi P., Balliano G., Milla P., Ferraccioli R., Sartori P., Djinovic-Carugo K., Bolognesi M. Inhibition of bovine beta-trypsin by the active site titrant N alpha-(N,N-dimethylcarbamoyl)-alpha-azaornithine p-nitrophenyl ester: a kinetic and X-ray crystallographic study. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995 Dec 14;217(2):437–444. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.2795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernstein F. C., Koetzle T. F., Williams G. J., Meyer E. F., Jr, Brice M. D., Rodgers J. R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol. 1977 May 25;112(3):535–542. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bode W., Huber R. Natural protein proteinase inhibitors and their interaction with proteinases. Eur J Biochem. 1992 Mar 1;204(2):433–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16654.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Böhm H. J. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1994 Jun;8(3):243–256. doi: 10.1007/BF00126743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Friedman R. A., Honig B. A free energy analysis of nucleic acid base stacking in aqueous solution. Biophys J. 1995 Oct;69(4):1528–1535. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80023-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Froloff N., Windemuth A., Honig B. On the calculation of binding free energies using continuum methods: application to MHC class I protein-peptide interactions. Protein Sci. 1997 Jun;6(6):1293–1301. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gilson M. K., Given J. A., Bush B. L., McCammon J. A. The statistical-thermodynamic basis for computation of binding affinities: a critical review. Biophys J. 1997 Mar;72(3):1047–1069. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78756-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gilson M. K., Given J. A., Head M. S. A new class of models for computing receptor-ligand binding affinities. Chem Biol. 1997 Feb;4(2):87–92. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(97)90251-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gilson M. K., Honig B. Calculation of the total electrostatic energy of a macromolecular system: solvation energies, binding energies, and conformational analysis. Proteins. 1988;4(1):7–18. doi: 10.1002/prot.340040104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gilson M. K., Rashin A., Fine R., Honig B. On the calculation of electrostatic interactions in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1985 Aug 5;184(3):503–516. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90297-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hendsch Z. S., Tidor B. Do salt bridges stabilize proteins? A continuum electrostatic analysis. Protein Sci. 1994 Feb;3(2):211–226. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Honig B. H., Hubbell W. L. Stability of "salt bridges" in membrane proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Sep;81(17):5412–5416. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.17.5412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Honig B., Nicholls A. Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science. 1995 May 26;268(5214):1144–1149. doi: 10.1126/science.7761829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jackson R. M., Sternberg M. J. A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: application to the docking problem. J Mol Biol. 1995 Jul 7;250(2):258–275. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lamb M. L., Jorgensen W. L. Computational approaches to molecular recognition. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 1997 Dec;1(4):449–457. doi: 10.1016/s1367-5931(97)80038-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Marrone T. J., Briggs J. M., McCammon J. A. Structure-based drug design: computational advances. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1997;37:71–90. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.37.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Misra V. K., Hecht J. L., Yang A. S., Honig B. Electrostatic contributions to the binding free energy of the lambdacI repressor to DNA. Biophys J. 1998 Nov;75(5):2262–2273. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77671-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nicholls A., Sharp K. A., Honig B. Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins. 1991;11(4):281–296. doi: 10.1002/prot.340110407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Novotny J., Bruccoleri R. E., Davis M., Sharp K. A. Empirical free energy calculations: a blind test and further improvements to the method. J Mol Biol. 1997 May 2;268(2):401–411. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Novotny J., Bruccoleri R. E., Saul F. A. On the attribution of binding energy in antigen-antibody complexes McPC 603, D1.3, and HyHEL-5. Biochemistry. 1989 May 30;28(11):4735–4749. doi: 10.1021/bi00437a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Otlewski J., Zbyryt T. Single peptide bond hydrolysis/resynthesis in squash inhibitors of serine proteinases. 1. Kinetics and thermodynamics of the interaction between squash inhibitors and bovine beta-trypsin. Biochemistry. 1994 Jan 11;33(1):200–207. doi: 10.1021/bi00167a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Perona J. J., Craik C. S. Structural basis of substrate specificity in the serine proteases. Protein Sci. 1995 Mar;4(3):337–360. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pickett S. D., Sternberg M. J. Empirical scale of side-chain conformational entropy in protein folding. J Mol Biol. 1993 Jun 5;231(3):825–839. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sampogna R. V., Honig B. Electrostatic coupling between retinal isomerization and the ionization state of Glu-204: a general mechanism for proton release in bacteriorhodopsin. Biophys J. 1996 Sep;71(3):1165–1171. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79320-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sartori P., Djinovic Carugo K., Ferraccioli R., Balliano G., Milla P., Ascenzi P., Bolognesi M. Active site titration of bovine beta-trypsin by N alpha-(N,N-dimethylcarbamoyl)-alpha-aza-lysine p-nitrophenyl ester: kinetic and crystallographic analysis. FEBS Lett. 1995 Jan 16;358(1):53–56. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)01366-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sharp K. A., Nicholls A., Fine R. F., Honig B. Reconciling the magnitude of the microscopic and macroscopic hydrophobic effects. Science. 1991 Apr 5;252(5002):106–109. doi: 10.1126/science.2011744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith K. C., Honig B. Evaluation of the conformational free energies of loops in proteins. Proteins. 1994 Feb;18(2):119–132. doi: 10.1002/prot.340180205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sussman J. L., Lin D., Jiang J., Manning N. O., Prilusky J., Ritter O., Abola E. E. Protein Data Bank (PDB): database of three-dimensional structural information of biological macromolecules. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1998 Nov 1;54(Pt 6 1):1078–1084. doi: 10.1107/s0907444998009378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Vincent J. P., Lazdunski M. Trypsin-pancreatic trypsin inhibitor association. Dynamics of the interaction and role of disulfide bridges. Biochemistry. 1972 Aug 1;11(16):2967–2977. doi: 10.1021/bi00766a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Williams D. H., Searle M. S., Mackay J. P., Gerhard U., Maplestone R. A. Toward an estimation of binding constants in aqueous solution: studies of associations of vancomycin group antibiotics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Feb 15;90(4):1172–1178. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.4.1172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yang A. S., Gunner M. R., Sampogna R., Sharp K., Honig B. On the calculation of pKas in proteins. Proteins. 1993 Mar;15(3):252–265. doi: 10.1002/prot.340150304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yang A. S., Honig B. Free energy determinants of secondary structure formation: I. alpha-Helices. J Mol Biol. 1995 Sep 22;252(3):351–365. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yang A. S., Honig B. Free energy determinants of secondary structure formation: II. Antiparallel beta-sheets. J Mol Biol. 1995 Sep 22;252(3):366–376. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang T., Koshland D. E., Jr Computational method for relative binding energies of enzyme-substrate complexes. Protein Sci. 1996 Feb;5(2):348–356. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560050219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES