Skip to main content
PMC home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1999 Dec;8(12):2598–2610. doi: 10.1110/ps.8.12.2598

Rotamer strain as a determinant of protein structural specificity.

G A Lazar 1, E C Johnson 1, J R Desjarlais 1, T M Handel 1
PMCID: PMC2144231  PMID: 10631975

Abstract

We present direct evidence for a change in protein structural specificity due to hydrophobic core packing. High resolution structural analysis of a designed core variant of ubiquitin reveals that the protein is in slow exchange between two conformations. Examination of side-chain rotamers indicates that this dynamic response and the lower stability of the protein are coupled to greater strain and mobility in the core. The results suggest that manipulating the level of side-chain strain may be one way of fine tuning the stability and specificity of proteins.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alexeev D., Bury S. M., Turner M. A., Ogunjobi O. M., Muir T. W., Ramage R., Sawyer L. Synthetic, structural and biological studies of the ubiquitin system: chemically synthesized and native ubiquitin fold into identical three-dimensional structures. Biochem J. 1994 Apr 1;299(Pt 1):159–163. doi: 10.1042/bj2990159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson D. H., Weiss M. S., Eisenberg D. Charges, hydrogen bonds, and correlated motions in the 1 A resolution refined structure of the mating pheromone Er-1 from Euplotes raikovi. J Mol Biol. 1997 Oct 24;273(2):479–500. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bai Y., Englander J. J., Mayne L., Milne J. S., Englander S. W. Thermodynamic parameters from hydrogen exchange measurements. Methods Enzymol. 1995;259:344–356. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(95)59051-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bai Y., Milne J. S., Mayne L., Englander S. W. Primary structure effects on peptide group hydrogen exchange. Proteins. 1993 Sep;17(1):75–86. doi: 10.1002/prot.340170110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baldwin E. P., Hajiseyedjavadi O., Baase W. A., Matthews B. W. The role of backbone flexibility in the accommodation of variants that repack the core of T4 lysozyme. Science. 1993 Dec 10;262(5140):1715–1718. doi: 10.1126/science.8259514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bax A., Vuister G. W., Grzesiek S., Delaglio F., Wang A. C., Tschudin R., Zhu G. Measurement of homo- and heteronuclear J couplings from quantitative J correlation. Methods Enzymol. 1994;239:79–105. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(94)39004-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen H., Hughes D. D., Chan T. A., Sedat J. W., Agard D. A. IVE (Image Visualization Environment): a software platform for all three-dimensional microscopy applications. J Struct Biol. 1996 Jan-Feb;116(1):56–60. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dahiyat B. I., Mayo S. L. De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. Science. 1997 Oct 3;278(5335):82–87. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5335.82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Desjarlais J. R., Handel T. M. De novo design of the hydrophobic cores of proteins. Protein Sci. 1995 Oct;4(10):2006–2018. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560041006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dill K. A. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry. 1990 Aug 7;29(31):7133–7155. doi: 10.1021/bi00483a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dunbrack R. L., Jr, Cohen F. E. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci. 1997 Aug;6(8):1661–1681. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dyson H. J., Wright P. E. Equilibrium NMR studies of unfolded and partially folded proteins. Nat Struct Biol. 1998 Jul;5 (Suppl):499–503. doi: 10.1038/739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Folmer R. H., Hilbers C. W., Konings R. N., Nilges M. Floating stereospecific assignment revisited: application to an 18 kDa protein and comparison with J-coupling data. J Biomol NMR. 1997 Apr;9(3):245–258. doi: 10.1023/a:1018670623695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gonzalez L., Jr, Plecs J. J., Alber T. An engineered allosteric switch in leucine-zipper oligomerization. Nat Struct Biol. 1996 Jun;3(6):510–515. doi: 10.1038/nsb0696-510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gonzalez L., Jr, Woolfson D. N., Alber T. Buried polar residues and structural specificity in the GCN4 leucine zipper. Nat Struct Biol. 1996 Dec;3(12):1011–1018. doi: 10.1038/nsb1296-1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Harata K., Abe Y., Muraki M. Crystallographic evaluation of internal motion of human alpha-lactalbumin refined by full-matrix least-squares method. J Mol Biol. 1999 Mar 26;287(2):347–358. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Harbury P. B., Zhang T., Kim P. S., Alber T. A switch between two-, three-, and four-stranded coiled coils in GCN4 leucine zipper mutants. Science. 1993 Nov 26;262(5138):1401–1407. doi: 10.1126/science.8248779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jackson S. E., Moracci M., elMasry N., Johnson C. M., Fersht A. R. Effect of cavity-creating mutations in the hydrophobic core of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. Biochemistry. 1993 Oct 26;32(42):11259–11269. doi: 10.1021/bi00093a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnson E. C., Lazar G. A., Desjarlais J. R., Handel T. M. Solution structure and dynamics of a designed hydrophobic core variant of ubiquitin. Structure. 1999 Aug 15;7(8):967–976. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80123-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kamtekar S., Schiffer J. M., Xiong H., Babik J. M., Hecht M. H. Protein design by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids. Science. 1993 Dec 10;262(5140):1680–1685. doi: 10.1126/science.8259512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kortemme T., Ramírez-Alvarado M., Serrano L. Design of a 20-amino acid, three-stranded beta-sheet protein. Science. 1998 Jul 10;281(5374):253–256. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5374.253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kraulis P. J., Domaille P. J., Campbell-Burk S. L., Van Aken T., Laue E. D. Solution structure and dynamics of ras p21.GDP determined by heteronuclear three- and four-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 1994 Mar 29;33(12):3515–3531. doi: 10.1021/bi00178a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Laskowski R. A., Rullmannn J. A., MacArthur M. W., Kaptein R., Thornton J. M. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J Biomol NMR. 1996 Dec;8(4):477–486. doi: 10.1007/BF00228148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lazar G. A., Desjarlais J. R., Handel T. M. De novo design of the hydrophobic core of ubiquitin. Protein Sci. 1997 Jun;6(6):1167–1178. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lazar G. A., Handel T. M. Hydrophobic core packing and protein design. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 1998 Dec;2(6):675–679. doi: 10.1016/s1367-5931(98)80102-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lim W. A., Hodel A., Sauer R. T., Richards F. M. The crystal structure of a mutant protein with altered but improved hydrophobic core packing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jan 4;91(1):423–427. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lim W. A., Sauer R. T. The role of internal packing interactions in determining the structure and stability of a protein. J Mol Biol. 1991 May 20;219(2):359–376. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90570-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Miller D. W., Agard D. A. Enzyme specificity under dynamic control: a normal mode analysis of alpha-lytic protease. J Mol Biol. 1999 Feb 12;286(1):267–278. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mizoue L. S., Bazan J. F., Johnson E. C., Handel T. M. Solution structure and dynamics of the CX3C chemokine domain of fractalkine and its interaction with an N-terminal fragment of CX3CR1. Biochemistry. 1999 Feb 2;38(5):1402–1414. doi: 10.1021/bi9820614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Munson M., Balasubramanian S., Fleming K. G., Nagi A. D., O'Brien R., Sturtevant J. M., Regan L. What makes a protein a protein? Hydrophobic core designs that specify stability and structural properties. Protein Sci. 1996 Aug;5(8):1584–1593. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560050813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nilges M. Calculation of protein structures with ambiguous distance restraints. Automated assignment of ambiguous NOE crosspeaks and disulphide connectivities. J Mol Biol. 1995 Feb 3;245(5):645–660. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.0053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nilges M., Macias M. J., O'Donoghue S. I., Oschkinat H. Automated NOESY interpretation with ambiguous distance restraints: the refined NMR solution structure of the pleckstrin homology domain from beta-spectrin. J Mol Biol. 1997 Jun 13;269(3):408–422. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Palmer A. G., 3rd Probing molecular motion by NMR. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1997 Oct;7(5):732–737. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80085-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Philippopoulos M., Lim C. Exploring the dynamic information content of a protein NMR structure: comparison of a molecular dynamics simulation with the NMR and X-ray structures of Escherichia coli ribonuclease HI. Proteins. 1999 Jul 1;36(1):87–110. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19990701)36:1<87::aid-prot8>3.0.co;2-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rader S. D., Agard D. A. Conformational substates in enzyme mechanism: the 120 K structure of alpha-lytic protease at 1.5 A resolution. Protein Sci. 1997 Jul;6(7):1375–1386. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rojas N. R., Kamtekar S., Simons C. T., McLean J. E., Vogel K. M., Spiro T. G., Farid R. S., Hecht M. H. De novo heme proteins from designed combinatorial libraries. Protein Sci. 1997 Dec;6(12):2512–2524. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560061204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Starich M. R., Wikström M., Schumacher S., Arst H. N., Jr, Gronenborn A. M., Clore G. M. The solution structure of the Leu22-->Val mutant AREA DNA binding domain complexed with a TGATAG core element defines a role for hydrophobic packing in the determination of specificity. J Mol Biol. 1998 Apr 3;277(3):621–634. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sun S., Brem R., Chan H. S., Dill K. A. Designing amino acid sequences to fold with good hydrophobic cores. Protein Eng. 1995 Dec;8(12):1205–1213. doi: 10.1093/protein/8.12.1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Talluri S., Wagner G. An optimized 3D NOESY-HSQC. J Magn Reson B. 1996 Aug;112(2):200–205. doi: 10.1006/jmrb.1996.0132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Vijay-Kumar S., Bugg C. E., Cook W. J. Structure of ubiquitin refined at 1.8 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1987 Apr 5;194(3):531–544. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90679-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Walsh S. T., Cheng H., Bryson J. W., Roder H., DeGrado W. F. Solution structure and dynamics of a de novo designed three-helix bundle protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 May 11;96(10):5486–5491. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wand A. J., Urbauer J. L., McEvoy R. P., Bieber R. J. Internal dynamics of human ubiquitin revealed by 13C-relaxation studies of randomly fractionally labeled protein. Biochemistry. 1996 May 14;35(19):6116–6125. doi: 10.1021/bi9530144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wishart D. S., Bigam C. G., Yao J., Abildgaard F., Dyson H. J., Oldfield E., Markley J. L., Sykes B. D. 1H, 13C and 15N chemical shift referencing in biomolecular NMR. J Biomol NMR. 1995 Sep;6(2):135–140. doi: 10.1007/BF00211777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yao J., Dyson H. J., Wright P. E. Chemical shift dispersion and secondary structure prediction in unfolded and partly folded proteins. FEBS Lett. 1997 Dec 15;419(2-3):285–289. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)01474-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES