Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1999 Feb;8(2):361–369. doi: 10.1110/ps.8.2.361

Pair potentials for protein folding: choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes.

M R Betancourt 1, D Thirumalai 1
PMCID: PMC2144252  PMID: 10048329

Abstract

We examine the similarities and differences between two widely used knowledge-based potentials, which are expressed as contact matrices (consisting of 210 elements) that gives a scale for interaction energies between the naturally occurring amino acid residues. These are the Miyazawa-Jernigan contact interaction matrix M and the potential matrix S derived by Skolnick J et al., 1997, Protein Sci 6:676-688. Although the correlation between the two matrices is good, there is a relatively large dispersion between the elements. We show that when Thr is chosen as a reference solvent within the Miyazawa and Jernigan scheme, the dispersion between the M and S matrices is reduced. The resulting interaction matrix B gives hydrophobicities that are in very good agreement with experiment. The small dispersion between the S and B matrices, which arises due to differing reference states, is shown to have dramatic effect on the predicted native states of lattice models of proteins. These findings and other arguments are used to suggest that for reliable predictions of protein structures, pairwise additive potentials are not sufficient. We also establish that optimized protein sequences can tolerate relatively large random errors in the pair potentials. We conjecture that three body interaction may be needed to predict the folds of proteins in a reliable manner.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (226.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Camacho C. J., Thirumalai D. Kinetics and thermodynamics of folding in model proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jul 1;90(13):6369–6372. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.13.6369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chan H. S., Dill K. A. Origins of structure in globular proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Aug;87(16):6388–6392. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.16.6388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Du R., Grosberg A. Y., Tanaka T. Models of protein interactions: how to choose one. Fold Des. 1998;3(3):203–211. doi: 10.1016/S1359-0278(98)00028-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ferrenberg AM, Swendsen RH. Optimized Monte Carlo data analysis. Phys Rev Lett. 1989 Sep 18;63(12):1195–1198. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Finkelstein A. V., Badretdinov AYa, Gutin A. M. Why do protein architectures have Boltzmann-like statistics? Proteins. 1995 Oct;23(2):142–150. doi: 10.1002/prot.340230204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Godzik A. Knowledge-based potentials for protein folding: what can we learn from known protein structures? Structure. 1996 Apr 15;4(4):363–366. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(96)00041-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Godzik A., Koliński A., Skolnick J. Are proteins ideal mixtures of amino acids? Analysis of energy parameter sets. Protein Sci. 1995 Oct;4(10):2107–2117. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560041016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jernigan R. L., Bahar I. Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1996 Apr;6(2):195–209. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(96)80075-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Levitt M. A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding. J Mol Biol. 1976 Jun 14;104(1):59–107. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90004-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mirny L. A., Shakhnovich E. I. How to derive a protein folding potential? A new approach to an old problem. J Mol Biol. 1996 Dec 20;264(5):1164–1179. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Miyazawa S., Jernigan R. L. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol. 1996 Mar 1;256(3):623–644. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moult J. Comparison of database potentials and molecular mechanics force fields. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1997 Apr;7(2):194–199. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80025-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nozaki Y., Tanford C. The solubility of amino acids and two glycine peptides in aqueous ethanol and dioxane solutions. Establishment of a hydrophobicity scale. J Biol Chem. 1971 Apr 10;246(7):2211–2217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Roseman M. A. Hydrophilicity of polar amino acid side-chains is markedly reduced by flanking peptide bonds. J Mol Biol. 1988 Apr 5;200(3):513–522. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90540-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sippl M. J. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1995 Apr;5(2):229–235. doi: 10.1016/0959-440x(95)80081-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Skolnick J., Jaroszewski L., Kolinski A., Godzik A. Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding. When is the quasichemical approximation correct? Protein Sci. 1997 Mar;6(3):676–688. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sun S. Reduced representation model of protein structure prediction: statistical potential and genetic algorithms. Protein Sci. 1993 May;2(5):762–785. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560020508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tanaka S., Scheraga H. A. Medium- and long-range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three-dimensional structures of proteins. Macromolecules. 1976 Nov-Dec;9(6):945–950. doi: 10.1021/ma60054a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Thomas P. D., Dill K. A. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they? J Mol Biol. 1996 Mar 29;257(2):457–469. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang L., Skolnick J. How do potentials derived from structural databases relate to "true" potentials? Protein Sci. 1998 Jan;7(1):112–122. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560070112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES