Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1999 Apr;8(4):890–896. doi: 10.1110/ps.8.4.890

The loss in hydrophobic surface area resulting from a Leu to Val mutation at the N-terminus of the aldehyde dehydrogenase presequence prevents import of the protein into mitochondria.

P K Hammen 1, T S Heard 1, M Waltner 1, H Weiner 1
PMCID: PMC2144303  PMID: 10211835

Abstract

An apparent conservative mutation, Leu to Val, at the second residue of the rat liver mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) presequence resulted in a precursor protein that was not imported into mitochondria. Additional mutants were made to substitute various amino acids with nonpolar side chains for Leu2. The Ile, Phe, and Trp mutants were imported to an extent similar to that of the native precursor, but the Ala mutant was imported only about one-fourth as well. It was shown that the N-terminal methionine was removed from the L2V mutant in a reaction catalyzed by methionine aminopeptidase. The N-terminal methionine of native pALDH and the other mutant presequences was blocked, presumably by acetylation. Because of the difference in co-translational modification, the L2V mutant sustained a significant loss in the available hydrophobic surface of the presequence. Import competence was restored to the L2V mutant when it was translated using a system that did not remove Met1. The removal of an Arg-Gly-Pro helix linker segment (residues 11-14) from the L2V mutant, which shifted three leucine residues toward the N-terminus, also restored import competence. These results lead to the conclusion that a minimum amount of hydrophobic surface area near the N-termini of mitochondrial presequences is an essential property to determine their ability to be imported. As a result, both electrostatic and hydrophobic components must be considered when trying to understand the interactions between precursor proteins and proteins of the mitochondrial import apparatus.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (216.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alconada A., Kübrich M., Moczko M., Hönlinger A., Pfanner N. The mitochondrial receptor complex: the small subunit Mom8b/Isp6 supports association of receptors with the general insertion pore and transfer of preproteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Nov;15(11):6196–6205. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.11.6196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arfin S. M., Bradshaw R. A. Cotranslational processing and protein turnover in eukaryotic cells. Biochemistry. 1988 Oct 18;27(21):7979–7984. doi: 10.1021/bi00421a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bedwell D. M., Strobel S. A., Yun K., Jongeward G. D., Emr S. D. Sequence and structural requirements of a mitochondrial protein import signal defined by saturation cassette mutagenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Mar;9(3):1014–1025. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.3.1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boissel J. P., Kasper T. J., Bunn H. F. Cotranslational amino-terminal processing of cytosolic proteins. Cell-free expression of site-directed mutants of human hemoglobin. J Biol Chem. 1988 Jun 15;263(17):8443–8449. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolliger L., Junne T., Schatz G., Lithgow T. Acidic receptor domains on both sides of the outer membrane mediate translocation of precursor proteins into yeast mitochondria. EMBO J. 1995 Dec 15;14(24):6318–6326. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00322.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chu T. W., Grant P. M., Strauss A. W. Mutation of a neutral amino acid in the transit peptide of rat mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase abolishes binding and import. J Biol Chem. 1987 Nov 15;262(32):15759–15764. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chu T. W., Grant P. M., Strauss A. W. The role of arginine residues in the rat mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase transit peptide. J Biol Chem. 1987 Sep 15;262(26):12806–12811. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eisenberg D., Weiss R. M., Terwilliger T. C. The helical hydrophobic moment: a measure of the amphiphilicity of a helix. Nature. 1982 Sep 23;299(5881):371–374. doi: 10.1038/299371a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hammen P. K., Waltner M., Hahnemann B., Heard T. S., Weiner H. The role of positive charges and structural segments in the presequence of rat liver aldehyde dehydrogenase in import into mitochondria. J Biol Chem. 1996 Aug 30;271(35):21041–21048. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Haucke V., Lithgow T., Rospert S., Hahne K., Schatz G. The yeast mitochondrial protein import receptor Mas20p binds precursor proteins through electrostatic interaction with the positively charged presequence. J Biol Chem. 1995 Mar 10;270(10):5565–5570. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.10.5565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heard T. S., Weiner H. A regional net charge and structural compensation model to explain how negatively charged amino acids can be accepted within a mitochondrial leader sequence. J Biol Chem. 1998 Nov 6;273(45):29389–29393. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.45.29389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Horwich A. L., Kalousek F., Fenton W. A., Pollock R. A., Rosenberg L. E. Targeting of pre-ornithine transcarbamylase to mitochondria: definition of critical regions and residues in the leader peptide. Cell. 1986 Feb 14;44(3):451–459. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90466-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jarvis J. A., Ryan M. T., Hoogenraad N. J., Craik D. J., Høj P. B. Solution structure of the acetylated and noncleavable mitochondrial targeting signal of rat chaperonin 10. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jan 20;270(3):1323–1331. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.3.1323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Komiya T., Rospert S., Koehler C., Looser R., Schatz G., Mihara K. Interaction of mitochondrial targeting signals with acidic receptor domains along the protein import pathway: evidence for the 'acid chain' hypothesis. EMBO J. 1998 Jul 15;17(14):3886–3898. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.14.3886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Komiya T., Sakaguchi M., Mihara K. Cytoplasmic chaperones determine the targeting pathway of precursor proteins to mitochondria. EMBO J. 1996 Jan 15;15(2):399–407. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kraus J. P., Novotný J., Kalousek F., Swaroop M., Rosenberg L. E. Different structures in the amino-terminal domain of the ornithine transcarbamylase leader peptide are involved in mitochondrial import and carboxyl-terminal cleavage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(23):8905–8909. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.23.8905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lithgow T., Glick B. S., Schatz G. The protein import receptor of mitochondria. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Mar;20(3):98–101. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)88972-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nargang F. E., Künkele K. P., Mayer A., Ritzel R. G., Neupert W., Lill R. 'Sheltered disruption' of Neurospora crassa MOM22, an essential component of the mitochondrial protein import complex. EMBO J. 1995 Mar 15;14(6):1099–1108. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07093.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nargang F. E., Rapaport D., Ritzel R. G., Neupert W., Lill R. Role of the negative charges in the cytosolic domain of TOM22 in the import of precursor proteins into mitochondria. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Jun;18(6):3173–3181. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.6.3173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pak Y. K., Weiner H. Import of chemically synthesized signal peptides into rat liver mitochondria. J Biol Chem. 1990 Aug 25;265(24):14298–14307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Richards F. M. The interpretation of protein structures: total volume, group volume distributions and packing density. J Mol Biol. 1974 Jan 5;82(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90570-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Roise D., Theiler F., Horvath S. J., Tomich J. M., Richards J. H., Allison D. S., Schatz G. Amphiphilicity is essential for mitochondrial presequence function. EMBO J. 1988 Mar;7(3):649–653. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02859.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sanger F., Nicklen S., Coulson A. R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463–5467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schatz G. Just follow the acid chain. Nature. 1997 Jul 10;388(6638):121–122. doi: 10.1038/40510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sharp K. A., Nicholls A., Friedman R., Honig B. Extracting hydrophobic free energies from experimental data: relationship to protein folding and theoretical models. Biochemistry. 1991 Oct 8;30(40):9686–9697. doi: 10.1021/bi00104a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sin N., Meng L., Wang M. Q., Wen J. J., Bornmann W. G., Crews C. M. The anti-angiogenic agent fumagillin covalently binds and inhibits the methionine aminopeptidase, MetAP-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jun 10;94(12):6099–6103. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.12.6099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Skerjanc I. S., Sheffield W. P., Silvius J. R., Shore G. C. Identification of hydrophobic residues in the signal sequence of mitochondrial preornithine carbamyltransferase that enhance the rate of precursor import. J Biol Chem. 1988 Nov 25;263(33):17233–17236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Thornton K., Wang Y., Weiner H., Gorenstein D. G. Import, processing, and two-dimensional NMR structure of a linker-deleted signal peptide of rat liver mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem. 1993 Sep 15;268(26):19906–19914. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang T. T., Farrés J., Weiner H. Liver mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase: in vitro expression, in vitro import, and effect of alcohols on import. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1989 Aug 1;272(2):440–449. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(89)90238-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang Y., Weiner H. The presequence of rat liver aldehyde dehydrogenase requires the presence of an alpha-helix at its N-terminal region which is stabilized by the helix at its C termini. J Biol Chem. 1993 Mar 5;268(7):4759–4765. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yamada R., Bradshaw R. A. Rat liver polysome N alpha-acetyltransferase: substrate specificity. Biochemistry. 1991 Jan 29;30(4):1017–1021. doi: 10.1021/bi00218a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. von Heijne G., Steppuhn J., Herrmann R. G. Domain structure of mitochondrial and chloroplast targeting peptides. Eur J Biochem. 1989 Apr 1;180(3):535–545. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb14679.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES