Skip to main content
PMC home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1999 Jun;8(6):1314–1319. doi: 10.1110/ps.8.6.1314

The paradox between m values and deltaCp's for denaturation of ribonuclease T1 with disulfide bonds intact and broken.

I V Baskakov 1, D W Bolen 1
PMCID: PMC2144357  PMID: 10386881

Abstract

Urea-induced denaturations of RNase T1 and reduced and carboxyamidated RNase T1 (RTCAM) as a function of temperature were analyzed using the linear extrapolation method, and denaturation m values, deltaCp, deltaH, deltaS, and deltaG quantities were determined. Because both deltaCp and m values are believed to reflect the protein surface area newly exposed on denaturation, the prediction is that the ratio of m values for RNase T1 and RTCAM should equal the deltaCp ratio for the two proteins. This is not the case, for it is found that the m value of RTCAM is 1.5 times that of RNase T1, while the denaturation deltaCp's for the two proteins are identical. The paradox of why the two parameters, m and deltaCp, are not equivalent in their behavior is of importance in the interpretations of their respective molecular-level meanings. It is found that the measured denaturation deltaCp's are consistent with deltaCp's calculated on the basis of empirical relationships between the change in surface area on denaturation (deltaASA), and that the measured m value of RNase T1 agrees with m calculated from empirical data relating m to deltaASA. However, the measured m of RTCAM is so much out of line with its calculated m as to call into question the validity of always equating m with surface area newly exposed on denaturation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (204.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baskakov I. V., Bolen D. W. Monitoring the sizes of denatured ensembles of staphylococcal nuclease proteins: implications regarding m values, intermediates, and thermodynamics. Biochemistry. 1998 Dec 22;37(51):18010–18017. doi: 10.1021/bi981849j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baskakov I., Bolen D. W. Forcing thermodynamically unfolded proteins to fold. J Biol Chem. 1998 Feb 27;273(9):4831–4834. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.9.4831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baskakov I., Wang A., Bolen D. W. Trimethylamine-N-oxide counteracts urea effects on rabbit muscle lactate dehydrogenase function: a test of the counteraction hypothesis. Biophys J. 1998 May;74(5):2666–2673. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77972-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carra J. H., Privalov P. L. Thermodynamics of denaturation of staphylococcal nuclease mutants: an intermediate state in protein folding. FASEB J. 1996 Jan;10(1):67–74. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.10.1.8566550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DeKoster G. T., Robertson A. D. Calorimetrically-derived parameters for protein interactions with urea and guanidine-HCl are not consistent with denaturant m values. Biophys Chem. 1997 Feb 28;64(1-3):59–68. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4622(96)02219-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Greene R. F., Jr, Pace C. N. Urea and guanidine hydrochloride denaturation of ribonuclease, lysozyme, alpha-chymotrypsin, and beta-lactoglobulin. J Biol Chem. 1974 Sep 10;249(17):5388–5393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hilser V. J., Townsend B. D., Freire E. Structure-based statistical thermodynamic analysis of T4 lysozyme mutants: structural mapping of cooperative interactions. Biophys Chem. 1997 Feb 28;64(1-3):69–79. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4622(96)02220-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kiefhaber T., Schmid F. X., Renner M., Hinz H. J., Hahn U., Quaas R. Stability of recombinant Lys25-ribonuclease T1. Biochemistry. 1990 Sep 11;29(36):8250–8257. doi: 10.1021/bi00488a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Murphy K. P., Freire E. Thermodynamics of structural stability and cooperative folding behavior in proteins. Adv Protein Chem. 1992;43:313–361. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60556-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Myers J. K., Pace C. N., Scholtz J. M. Denaturant m values and heat capacity changes: relation to changes in accessible surface areas of protein unfolding. Protein Sci. 1995 Oct;4(10):2138–2148. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560041020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mücke M., Schmid F. X. A kinetic method to evaluate the two-state character of solvent-induced protein denaturation. Biochemistry. 1994 Nov 1;33(43):12930–12935. doi: 10.1021/bi00209a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mücke M., Schmid F. X. Enzymatic catalysis of prolyl isomerization in an unfolding protein. Biochemistry. 1992 Sep 1;31(34):7848–7854. doi: 10.1021/bi00149a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pace C. N., Grimsley G. R., Thomson J. A., Barnett B. J. Conformational stability and activity of ribonuclease T1 with zero, one, and two intact disulfide bonds. J Biol Chem. 1988 Aug 25;263(24):11820–11825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Plaza del Pino I. M., Pace C. N., Freire E. Temperature and guanidine hydrochloride dependence of the structural stability of ribonuclease T1. Biochemistry. 1992 Nov 17;31(45):11196–11202. doi: 10.1021/bi00160a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Santoro M. M., Bolen D. W. Unfolding free energy changes determined by the linear extrapolation method. 1. Unfolding of phenylmethanesulfonyl alpha-chymotrypsin using different denaturants. Biochemistry. 1988 Oct 18;27(21):8063–8068. doi: 10.1021/bi00421a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Soulages J. L. Chemical denaturation: potential impact of undetected intermediates in the free energy of unfolding and m-values obtained from a two-state assumption. Biophys J. 1998 Jul;75(1):484–492. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77537-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Spolar R. S., Livingstone J. R., Record M. T., Jr Use of liquid hydrocarbon and amide transfer data to estimate contributions to thermodynamic functions of protein folding from the removal of nonpolar and polar surface from water. Biochemistry. 1992 Apr 28;31(16):3947–3955. doi: 10.1021/bi00131a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Thomson J. A., Shirley B. A., Grimsley G. R., Pace C. N. Conformational stability and mechanism of folding of ribonuclease T1. J Biol Chem. 1989 Jul 15;264(20):11614–11620. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yu Y., Makhatadze G. I., Pace C. N., Privalov P. L. Energetics of ribonuclease T1 structure. Biochemistry. 1994 Mar 22;33(11):3312–3319. doi: 10.1021/bi00177a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES