Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1999 Sep;8(9):1806–1815. doi: 10.1110/ps.8.9.1806

Predicting allosteric switches in myosins.

K Kirshenbaum 1, M Young 1, S Highsmith 1
PMCID: PMC2144402  PMID: 10493582

Abstract

The sequences of several members of the myosin family of molecular motors are evaluated using ASP (Ambivalent Structure Predictor), a new computational method. ASP predicts structurally ambivalent sequence elements by analyzing the output from a secondary structure prediction algorithm. These ambivalent sequence elements form secondary structures that are hypothesized to function as switches by undergoing conformational rearrangement. For chicken skeletal muscle myosin, 13 discrete structurally ambivalent sequence elements are identified. All 13 are located in the heavy chain motor domain. When these sequence elements are mapped into the myosin tertiary structure, they form two compact regions that connect the actin binding site to the adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) site, and the ATP site to the fulcrum site for the force-producing bending of the motor domain. These regions, predicted by the new algorithm to undergo conformational rearrangements, include the published known and putative switches of the myosin motor domain, and they form plausible allosteric connections between the three main functional sites of myosin. The sequences of several other members of the myosin I and II families are also analyzed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bauer C. B., Kuhlman P. A., Bagshaw C. R., Rayment I. X-ray crystal structure and solution fluorescence characterization of Mg.2'(3')-O-(N-methylanthraniloyl) nucleotides bound to the Dictyostelium discoideum myosin motor domain. J Mol Biol. 1997 Dec 5;274(3):394–407. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chou P. Y., Fasman G. D. Prediction of protein conformation. Biochemistry. 1974 Jan 15;13(2):222–245. doi: 10.1021/bi00699a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chou P. Y., Fasman G. D. The conformation of glucagon: predictions and consequences. Biochemistry. 1975 Jun 3;14(11):2536–2541. doi: 10.1021/bi00682a037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coluccio L. M. Myosin I. Am J Physiol. 1997 Aug;273(2 Pt 1):C347–C359. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1997.273.2.C347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dominguez R., Freyzon Y., Trybus K. M., Cohen C. Crystal structure of a vertebrate smooth muscle myosin motor domain and its complex with the essential light chain: visualization of the pre-power stroke state. Cell. 1998 Sep 4;94(5):559–571. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81598-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fisher A. J., Smith C. A., Thoden J. B., Smith R., Sutoh K., Holden H. M., Rayment I. X-ray structures of the myosin motor domain of Dictyostelium discoideum complexed with MgADP.BeFx and MgADP.AlF4-. Biochemistry. 1995 Jul 18;34(28):8960–8972. doi: 10.1021/bi00028a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gulick A. M., Bauer C. B., Thoden J. B., Rayment I. X-ray structures of the MgADP, MgATPgammaS, and MgAMPPNP complexes of the Dictyostelium discoideum myosin motor domain. Biochemistry. 1997 Sep 30;36(39):11619–11628. doi: 10.1021/bi9712596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Highsmith S., Duignan K., Franks-Skiba K., Polosukhina K., Cooke R. Reversible inactivation of myosin subfragment 1 activity by mechanical immobilization. Biophys J. 1998 Mar;74(3):1465–1472. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77858-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Highsmith S., Eden D. Ligand-induced myosin subfragment 1 global conformational change. Biochemistry. 1990 May 1;29(17):4087–4093. doi: 10.1021/bi00469a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Highsmith S., Kretzschmar K. M., O'Konski C. T., Morales M. F. Flexibility of myosin rod, light meromyosin, and myosin subfragment-2 in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Nov;74(11):4986–4990. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.11.4986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hvidt S., Chang T., Yu H. Rigidity of myosin and myosin rod by electric birefringence. Biopolymers. 1984 Jul;23(7):1283–1294. doi: 10.1002/bip.360230712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kull F. J., Sablin E. P., Lau R., Fletterick R. J., Vale R. D. Crystal structure of the kinesin motor domain reveals a structural similarity to myosin. Nature. 1996 Apr 11;380(6574):550–555. doi: 10.1038/380550a0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Maita T., Yajima E., Nagata S., Miyanishi T., Nakayama S., Matsuda G. The primary structure of skeletal muscle myosin heavy chain: IV. Sequence of the rod, and the complete 1,938-residue sequence of the heavy chain. J Biochem. 1991 Jul;110(1):75–87. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a123546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mendelson R. A., Morales M. F., Botts J. Segmental flexibility of the S-1 moiety of myosin. Biochemistry. 1973 Jun 5;12(12):2250–2255. doi: 10.1021/bi00736a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Onishi H., Morales M. F., Kojima S., Katoh K., Fujiwara K. Functional transitions in myosin: role of highly conserved Gly and Glu residues in the active site. Biochemistry. 1997 Apr 1;36(13):3767–3772. doi: 10.1021/bi9630772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pollard T. D., Doberstein S. K., Zot H. G. Myosin-I. Annu Rev Physiol. 1991;53:653–681. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.53.030191.003253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Polosukhina K., Highsmith S. Kinetic investigation of the ligand dependence of rabbit skeletal muscle myosin subfragment 1 Cys-697 and Cys-707 reactivities. Biochemistry. 1997 Sep 30;36(39):11952–11958. doi: 10.1021/bi9713759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rayment I., Holden H. M., Whittaker M., Yohn C. B., Lorenz M., Holmes K. C., Milligan R. A. Structure of the actin-myosin complex and its implications for muscle contraction. Science. 1993 Jul 2;261(5117):58–65. doi: 10.1126/science.8316858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rayment I., Rypniewski W. R., Schmidt-Bäse K., Smith R., Tomchick D. R., Benning M. M., Winkelmann D. A., Wesenberg G., Holden H. M. Three-dimensional structure of myosin subfragment-1: a molecular motor. Science. 1993 Jul 2;261(5117):50–58. doi: 10.1126/science.8316857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rayment I., Smith C., Yount R. G. The active site of myosin. Annu Rev Physiol. 1996;58:671–702. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.58.030196.003323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Reisler E., Burke M., Himmelfarb S., Harrington W. F. Spatial proximity of the two essential sulfhydryl groups of myosin. Biochemistry. 1974 Sep 10;13(19):3837–3840. doi: 10.1021/bi00716a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rost B. PHD: predicting one-dimensional protein structure by profile-based neural networks. Methods Enzymol. 1996;266:525–539. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(96)66033-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rost B., Sander C. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J Mol Biol. 1993 Jul 20;232(2):584–599. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ruppel K. M., Spudich J. A. Structure-function analysis of the motor domain of myosin. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996;12:543–573. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ruppel K. M., Spudich J. A. Structure-function studies of the myosin motor domain: importance of the 50-kDa cleft. Mol Biol Cell. 1996 Jul;7(7):1123–1136. doi: 10.1091/mbc.7.7.1123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sablin E. P., Kull F. J., Cooke R., Vale R. D., Fletterick R. J. Crystal structure of the motor domain of the kinesin-related motor ncd. Nature. 1996 Apr 11;380(6574):555–559. doi: 10.1038/380555a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Smith C. A., Rayment I. X-ray structure of the magnesium(II)-pyrophosphate complex of the truncated head of Dictyostelium discoideum myosin to 2.7 A resolution. Biochemistry. 1995 Jul 18;34(28):8973–8981. doi: 10.1021/bi00028a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith C. A., Rayment I. X-ray structure of the magnesium(II).ADP.vanadate complex of the Dictyostelium discoideum myosin motor domain to 1.9 A resolution. Biochemistry. 1996 Apr 30;35(17):5404–5417. doi: 10.1021/bi952633+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Warrick H. M., De Lozanne A., Leinwand L. A., Spudich J. A. Conserved protein domains in a myosin heavy chain gene from Dictyostelium discoideum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Dec;83(24):9433–9437. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.24.9433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wells J. A., Yount R. G. Active site trapping of nucleotides by crosslinking two sulfhydryls in myosin subfragment 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):4966–4970. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.4966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Werber M. M., Szent-Györgyi A. G., Fasman G. D. Fluorescence studies on heavy meromyosin-substrate interaction. Biochemistry. 1972 Jul 18;11(15):2872–2883. doi: 10.1021/bi00765a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Whittaker M., Wilson-Kubalek E. M., Smith J. E., Faust L., Milligan R. A., Sweeney H. L. A 35-A movement of smooth muscle myosin on ADP release. Nature. 1995 Dec 14;378(6558):748–751. doi: 10.1038/378748a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Young M., Kirshenbaum K., Dill K. A., Highsmith S. Predicting conformational switches in proteins. Protein Sci. 1999 Sep;8(9):1752–1764. doi: 10.1110/ps.8.9.1752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES