Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 2000 Jun;9(6):1235–1245. doi: 10.1110/ps.9.6.1235

Molecular simulation study of cooperativity in hydrophobic association.

C Czaplewski 1, S Rodziewicz-Motowidło 1, A Liwo 1, D R Ripoll 1, R J Wawak 1, H A Scheraga 1
PMCID: PMC2144663  PMID: 10892816

Abstract

To investigate the cooperativity of hydrophobic interactions, the potential of mean force of two- and three-molecule methane clusters in water was determined by molecular dynamics simulations using two methods: umbrella-sampling with the weighted histogram analysis method and thermodynamic integration. Two water models, TIP3P and TIP4P, were used, while each methane molecule was modeled as a united atom. It was found that the three-body potential of mean force is not additive, i.e., it cannot be calculated as a sum of two-body contributions, but requires an additional three-body cooperative term. The cooperative term, which amounts to only about 10% of the total hydrophobic association free energy, was found to increase the strength of hydrophobic association; this finding differs from the results of earlier Monte Carlo studies with the free energy perturbation method of Rank and Baker (1997). As in the work of Rank and Baker, the solvent contribution to the potential of mean force was found to be well approximated by the molecular surface of two methane molecules. Moreover, we also found that the cooperative term is well represented by the difference between the molecular surface of the three-methane cluster and those of all three pairs of methane molecules. In addition, it was found that, while there is a cooperative contribution to the hydrophobic association free energy albeit a small one, the errors associated with the use of pairwise potentials are comparable to or larger than this contribution.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (609.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cramer Christopher J., Truhlar Donald G. Implicit Solvation Models: Equilibria, Structure, Spectra, and Dynamics. Chem Rev. 1999 Aug 11;99(8):2161–2200. doi: 10.1021/cr960149m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Godzik A., Kolinski A., Skolnick J. De novo and inverse folding predictions of protein structure and dynamics. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1993 Aug;7(4):397–438. doi: 10.1007/BF02337559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. KAUZMANN W. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Adv Protein Chem. 1959;14:1–63. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60608-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Koradi R., Billeter M., Wüthrich K. MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J Mol Graph. 1996 Feb;14(1):51-5, 29-32. doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00009-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Liwo A., Lee J., Ripoll D. R., Pillardy J., Scheraga H. A. Protein structure prediction by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 May 11;96(10):5482–5485. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. No K. T., Kim S. G., Cho K. H., Scheraga H. A. Description of hydration free energy density as a function of molecular physical properties. Biophys Chem. 1999 Apr 5;78(1-2):127–145. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4622(98)00225-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rank J. A., Baker D. A desolvation barrier to hydrophobic cluster formation may contribute to the rate-limiting step in protein folding. Protein Sci. 1997 Feb;6(2):347–354. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Richards F. M. Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1977;6:151–176. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.06.060177.001055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Roux B., Simonson T. Implicit solvent models. Biophys Chem. 1999 Apr 5;78(1-2):1–20. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4622(98)00226-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Scheraga H. A. Theory of hydrophobic interactions. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1998 Oct;16(2):447–460. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1998.10508260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tsai J., Gerstein M., Levitt M. Simulating the minimum core for hydrophobic collapse in globular proteins. Protein Sci. 1997 Dec;6(12):2606–2616. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560061212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tuñn I., Silla E., Pascual-Ahuir J. L. Molecular surface area and hydrophobic effect. Protein Eng. 1992 Dec;5(8):715–716. doi: 10.1093/protein/5.8.715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES