Skip to main content
PMC home page
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 1995 Jun;41:1005–1011.

Alternative medicine and general practitioners. Opinions and behaviour.

M J Verhoef 1, L R Sutherland 1
PMCID: PMC2146582  PMID: 7780312

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe general practitioners' opinions and behaviour regarding alternative medicine. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of a random sample of Ontario and Alberta general practitioners. SETTING: General practices in Ontario and Alberta. PARTICIPANTS: A questionnaire was mailed to 400 general practitioners. Of the 384 eligible physicians, 200 completed the questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reported beliefs and practices concerning alternative medicine. RESULTS: Acupuncture, chiropractic, and hypnosis were considered most useful and reflexology, naturopathy, and homeopathy least useful. Results showed 56% of general practitioners believed that alternative medicine has ideas and methods from which conventional medicine could benefit, 54% referred to alternative practitioners, and 16% practised some form of alternative medicine. Province of practice, place of graduation, training in alternative approaches, number of alternative approaches perceived useful, and attitude toward alternative medicine were clearly related to referring to alternative practitioners. Sex, age, type of practice, training in alternative medicine, referring to alternative practitioners, number of alternative approaches perceived useful, and attitude toward alternative medicine were related to practicing alternative medicine. CONCLUSION: Although acceptance and integration of alternative medicine extend only to certain approaches, alternative medicine cannot be discounted in general practice. A study encompassing all Canadian provinces could help in planning medical education and developing policies to guide physician behaviour.

Full text

PDF
1005

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aakster C. W. Concepts in alternative medicine. Soc Sci Med. 1986;22(2):265–273. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90075-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aldridge D. The delivery of health care alternatives: discussion paper. J R Soc Med. 1990 Mar;83(3):179–182. doi: 10.1177/014107689008300317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson E., Anderson P. General practitioners and alternative medicine. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Feb;37(295):52–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berk M. L. Interviewing physicians: the effect of improved response rate. Am J Public Health. 1985 Nov;75(11):1338–1340. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.11.1338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eisenberg D. M., Kessler R. C., Foster C., Norlock F. E., Calkins D. R., Delbanco T. L. Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jan 28;328(4):246–252. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199301283280406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hadley C. M. Complementary medicine and the general practitioner: a survey of general practitioners in the Wellington area. N Z Med J. 1988 Nov 9;101(857):766–768. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Himmel W., Schulte M., Kochen M. M. Complementary medicine: are patients' expectations being met by their general practitioners? Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Jun;43(371):232–235. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kleijnen J., Knipschild P., ter Riet G. Clinical trials of homoeopathy. BMJ. 1991 Feb 9;302(6772):316–323. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6772.316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Knipschild P., Kleijnen J., ter Riet G. Belief in the efficacy of alternative medicine among general practitioners in The Netherlands. Soc Sci Med. 1990;31(5):625–626. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90099-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lewith G. T., Field J., Machin D. Acupuncture compared with placebo in post-herpetic pain. Pain. 1983 Dec;17(4):361–368. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90167-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lynöe N., Svensson T. Physicians and alternative medicine--an investigation of attitudes and practice. Scand J Soc Med. 1992 Mar;20(1):55–60. doi: 10.1177/140349489202000111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Marshall R. J., Gee R., Israel M., Neave D., Edwards F., Dumble J., Wong S., Chan C., Patel R., Poon P. The use of alternative therapies by Auckland general practitioners. N Z Med J. 1990 May 9;103(889):213–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Meade T. W., Dyer S., Browne W., Townsend J., Frank A. O. Low back pain of mechanical origin: randomised comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient treatment. BMJ. 1990 Jun 2;300(6737):1431–1437. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6737.1431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Reilly D. T. Young doctors' views on alternative medicine. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Jul 30;287(6388):337–339. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6388.337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Verhoef M. J., Sutherland L. R., Brkich L. Use of alternative medicine by patients attending a gastroenterology clinic. CMAJ. 1990 Jan 15;142(2):121–125. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Visser G. J., Peters L. Alternative medicine and general practitioners in The Netherlands: towards acceptance and integration. Fam Pract. 1990 Sep;7(3):227–232. doi: 10.1093/fampra/7.3.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wharton R., Lewith G. Complementary medicine and the general practitioner. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Jun 7;292(6534):1498–1500. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6534.1498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES