Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1953 Mar 20;36(4):473–487. doi: 10.1085/jgp.36.4.473

THE RELATIONSHIP OF SODIUM UPTAKE, POTASSIUM REJECTION, AND SKIN POTENTIAL IN ISOLATED FROG SKIN

Ernst G Huf 1, Joyce Wills 1
PMCID: PMC2147378  PMID: 13035064

Abstract

1. Isolated surviving frog skin, when bathed with the same kind of diluted Ringer's solution on both sides, shows a negative correlation between net active salt uptake by the epithelium and spontaneous skin potential. Average values of 0.15 to 0.86 µeq. x hr.–1 x cm.–2 were measured and correlated with average skin potentials ranging from 107 to 25 mv. 2. Sodium uptake exceeded chloride uptake by about the same amount, irrespective of the height of the skin potential. 3. The same skins which exhibited a negative correlation between net uptake of sodium chloride and skin potential showed a positive correlation between net potassium rejection from the epithelium and skin potential, for voltages above 30 to 40 mv. In skins of voltages lower than this, potassium ions were taken up rather than rejected. Average values for rejection of +11.8 to –0.8 centi-µeq. x hr.–1 x cm.–2 were measured. 4. Net fluid uptake, associated with active uptake of sodium chloride, was small and occurred in the direction of the salt uptake. No dependence of net fluid uptake upon skin potential was observed. 5. Skins of winter frogs, pretreated with a commercial purified ACTH preparation, were less active than their respective controls with regard to uptake of sodium chloride. Rejection of potassium was the same in treated and untreated skins. Posterior pituitary factors, as possible contaminants, did not account for the effect of the ACTH preparation. 6. DOCA, DOC, and cortisone did not alter the normal correlation referred to under (1) and (3). 7. In interpreting the experimental results on theoretical grounds, it is suggested (a) that in normal skin, it is the variation in the electric conductance in skin of chloride ions which essentially, although not exclusively, determines the rate of net uptake of sodium chloride, (b) that a factor in the ACTH preparation used, possibly ACTH itself, may have lowered the electric conductance in skin of sodium ions either truly or apparently, (c) that potassium ions are treated by the skin primarily as passive ions. There is some indication that potassium ions are also actively taken up by the epithelium of skin.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (810.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. HUF E. G., PARRISH J. Nature of the electrolyte pump in surviving frog skin. Am J Physiol. 1951 Feb;164(2):428–436. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1951.164.2.428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. HUF E. G., PARRISH J., WEATHERFORD C. Active salt and water uptake by isolated frog skin. Am J Physiol. 1951 Jan;164(1):137–142. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1950.164.1.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HUF E. G., WILLS J., COOLEY M. J. The significance of the anion in active salt uptake by isolated frog skin. Pflugers Arch. 1952 Apr;255(1):16–26. doi: 10.1007/BF00371771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HUF E. G., WILLS J. Influence of some inorganic cations on active salt and water uptake by isolated frog skin. Am J Physiol. 1951 Oct;167(1):255–260. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1951.167.1.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. JOHNSEN V. K., LEVI H., USSING H. H. The mode of passage of chloride ions through the isolated frog skin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1952 Jun 6;25(2-3):150–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1952.tb00866.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. LEVI H., USSING H. H. Resting potential and ion movements in the frog skin. Nature. 1949 Nov 26;164(4178):928–928. doi: 10.1038/164928a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. USSING H. H., ZERAHN K. Active transport of sodium as the source of electric current in the short-circuited isolated frog skin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1951 Aug 25;23(2-3):110–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1951.tb00800.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES