Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1954 Nov 20;38(2):225–243.

FILTRATION, DIFFUSION, AND MOLECULAR SIEVING THROUGH POROUS CELLULOSE MEMBRANES

Eugene M Renkin 1
PMCID: PMC2147404  PMID: 13211998

Abstract

1. A study has been made of the diffusion and filtration of a graded series of molecules (including tritium-labelled water, urea, glucose, antipyrine, sucrose, raffinose, and hemoglobin) in aqueous solution through porous cellulose membranes of three degrees of porosity. 2. Experimental results were in close agreement with predictions based on the membrane pore theory of Pappenheimer et al. (1,2). Restriction to molecular diffusion is a function of pore radius and molecular radius described by equation (11) in the text. Molecular sieving during ultrafiltration is a function of total pore area per unit path length, pore radius, molecular radius, and filtration rate given by equations (16) and (19). 3. Estimates of average pore radius made by means of this theory were considerably larger than estimates made by the method of Elford and Ferry (3) (Table II). Sources of error in the latter method are discussed and a new method of membrane calibration is proposed in which the total cross-sectional area of the pores is measured by direct diffusion of isotope-labelled water. 4. Steady-state osmotic pressures of solutions of sucrose and raffinose measured during molecular sieving through cellulose membranes were found to be close to the "ideal" osmotic pressures calculated by van't Hoff's law. Thus the present experimental data support the methods used by Pappenheimer et al. in their studies on living capillary walls as well as their theory of membrane pore permeability.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (923.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BUGHER J. C. Characteristics of collodion membranes for ultrafiltration. J Gen Physiol. 1953 Jan;36(3):431–448. doi: 10.1085/jgp.36.3.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Conway E. J., O'malley E. Microdiffusion methods. Ammonia and urea using buffered absorbents (revised methods for ranges greater than 10mug. N). Biochem J. 1942 Sep;36(7-9):655–661. doi: 10.1042/bj0360655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eggleton M. G., Pappenheimer J. R., Winton F. R. The influence of diuretics on the osmotic work done and on the efficiency of the isolated kidney of the dog. J Physiol. 1940 Jan 15;97(3):363–382. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1940.sp003815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GRIM E. Relation between pressure and concentration difference across membranes permeable to solute and solvent. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1953 Jun;83(2):195–200. doi: 10.3181/00379727-83-20306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hamilton P. B., Farr L. E., Hiller A., Van Slyke D. D. PREPARATION OF HEMOGLOBIN SOLUTIONS FOR INTRAVENOUS INFUSION. J Exp Med. 1947 Nov 30;86(6):455–463. doi: 10.1084/jem.86.6.455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. PAPPENHEIMER J. R. Passage of molecules through capillary wals. Physiol Rev. 1953 Jul;33(3):387–423. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1953.33.3.387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. RENKIN E. M. Capillary and cellular permeability to some compounds related to antipyrine. Am J Physiol. 1953 Apr;173(1):125–130. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1953.173.1.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SCHREINER G. E. Determination of inulin by means of resorcinol. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1950 May;74(1):117–120. doi: 10.3181/00379727-74-17827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES