Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1957 Mar 20;40(4):565–577. doi: 10.1085/jgp.40.4.565

INTRACELLULAR RECORDING FROM THE GIANT SYNAPSE OF THE SQUID

Theodore H Bullock 1, Susumu Hagiwara 1
PMCID: PMC2147642  PMID: 13416531

Abstract

1. Recording with glass micropipette electrodes inserted close to the synaptic region, in the presynaptic and in the postsynaptic fibers of the giant synapse in the stellate ganglion of the squid, has been accomplished. 2. The forms of the spike and of the synaptic potential are very much like those reported earlier (Bullock, 1948) from macroelectrodes. The crest time and the rate of fall are labile and depend on the state of fatigue, though the time of initiation of the postsynaptic potential does not. 3. It is concluded after examination of both intra- and extracellular recordings that there is a real synaptic delay of the order of 1 or 2 milliseconds at 15–20°C. 4. There is sometimes a very small and sometimes no visible deflection in the intracellular postsynaptic record attributable to the presynaptic spike. It is concluded that transmission cannot be electrical. 5. The amplitude of the postsynaptic potential can be controlled over some range by the amplitude of the presynaptic potential. 6. Hyperpolarization of the postsynaptic membrane results in increase in amplitude of spikes up to 200 millivolts, in increase in the membrane potential level at which the spike flares up, but in no considerable change in the amplitude in postsynaptic potential. 7. The postsynaptic potential can add to the late falling phase and the undershoot of an antidromic spike in the postfiber but cannot add to the crest or early part of the falling phase. The earliest part of the antidromic spike during which the postsynaptic potential can add is probably a period of refractoriness to electrical shock by analogy with the properties of the axon.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (786.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALBE-FESSARD D., BUSER P. Réception intracellulaire de l'activité d'un neurone des lobes électriques de Torpedo marmorata. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci. 1952 Dec 22;235(25):1688–1690. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ALTAMIRANO M., COATES C. W., GRUNDFEST H. Mechanisms of direct and neural excitability in electroplaques of electric eel. J Gen Physiol. 1955 Jan 20;38(3):319–360. doi: 10.1085/jgp.38.3.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. ARAKI T., OTANI T. Response of single motoneurons to direct stimulation in toad's spinal cord. J Neurophysiol. 1955 Sep;18(5):472–485. doi: 10.1152/jn.1955.18.5.472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BROCK L. G., COOMBS J. S., ECCLES J. C. The recording of potentials from motoneurones with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1952 Aug;117(4):431–460. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BULLOCK T. H. The invertebrate neuron junction. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1952;17:267–273. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1952.017.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. COOMBS J. S., ECCLES J. C., FATT P. Excitatory synaptic action in motoneurones. J Physiol. 1955 Nov 28;130(2):374–395. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Changes in end-plate activity produced by presynaptic polarization. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):586–604. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ECCLES R. M. Intracellular potentials recorded from a mammalian sympathetic ganglion. J Physiol. 1955 Dec 29;130(3):572–584. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FATT P., KATZ B. An analysis of the end-plate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1951 Nov 28;115(3):320–370. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. FATT P., KATZ B. The effect of inhibitory nerve impulses on a crustacean muscle fibre. J Physiol. 1953 Aug;121(2):374–389. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. FRANK K., FUORTES M. G. Potentials recorded from the spinal cord with microelectrodes. J Physiol. 1955 Dec 29;130(3):625–654. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. FRANK K., FUORTES M. G. Unitary activity of spinal interneurones of cats. J Physiol. 1956 Feb 28;131(2):424–435. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. TASAKI I., HAGIWARA S., WATANABE A. Action potentials recorded from inside a Mauthner cell of the catfish. Jpn J Physiol. 1954 Mar 5;4(1):79–90. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.4.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. TASAKI I., POLLEY E. H., ORREGO F. Action potentials from individual elements in cat geniculate and striate cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1954 Sep;17(5):454–474. doi: 10.1152/jn.1954.17.5.454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. TAUC L. Etude de l'activité élémentaire des cellules du ganglion abdominal de l'Aplysie. J Physiol (Paris) 1955;47(4):769–792. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Terzuolo C. A., Bullock T. H. MEASUREMENT OF IMPOSED VOLTAGE GRADIENT ADEQUATE TO MODULATE NEURONAL FIRING. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1956 Sep;42(9):687–694. doi: 10.1073/pnas.42.9.687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. WOODBURY J. W., PATTON H. D. Electrical activity of single spinal cord elements. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1952;17:185–188. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1952.017.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES