Abstract
Non-invasive automatic blood pressure monitors (BP-103N, DINAMAP 845XT, Finapres 2300) were compared with the auscultatory method. The blood pressure readings given by the oscillometric method (BP-103N, DINAMAP 845XT) were accurate and reproducible. Agreement with the auscultatory method was especially good for systolic pressure. For diastolic pressure readings, there was less agreement with the results of the auscultatory method. The finger arterial pressure method (Finapres 2300) occasionally displayed greater variability than the devices using the oscillometric method.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cederholm I., Sørensen J., Carlsson C. Thrombosis following percutaneous radial artery cannulation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1986 Apr;30(3):227–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1986.tb02402.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goldthorp S. L., Cameron A., Asbury A. J. Dinamap arm and thigh arterial pressure measurement. Anaesthesia. 1986 Oct;41(10):1032–1035. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1986.tb12749.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kermode J. L., Davis N. J., Thompson W. R. Comparison of the Finapres blood pressure monitor with intra-arterial manometry during induction of anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1989 Nov;17(4):470–475. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8901700413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]