Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Anesthesia Progress logoLink to Anesthesia Progress
. 1998 Fall;45(4):139–142.

Change in pain threshold by meperidine, naproxen sodium, and acetaminophen as determined by electric pulp testing.

P L Carnes 1, B Cook 1, P D Eleazer 1, J P Scheetz 1
PMCID: PMC2148986  PMID: 10483385

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare changes in pain threshold caused by meperidine, naproxen sodium, acetaminophen, and placebo. The change in pain threshold was measured by electric pulp testing. Acetaminophen elevated the pain threshold statistically significantly. Clinically, however, the superiority of acetaminophen is questionable. No elevation of the pain threshold occurred with narcotic drugs or with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: our research shows that the electric pulp tests of patients who have taken these drugs preoperatively will have results similar to those of patients who have taken no drugs. We question the philosophy of administering these drugs for change in pain threshold at the levels used here preoperatively.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bannwarth B., Demotes-Mainard F., Schaeverbeke T., Labat L., Dehais J. Central analgesic effects of aspirin-like drugs. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 1995;9(1):1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.1995.tb00258.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen A. C., Chapman C. R. Aspirin analgesia evaluated by event-related potentials in man: possible central action in brain. Exp Brain Res. 1980;39(4):359–364. doi: 10.1007/BF00239300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooper B. Y., Vierck C. J., Jr, Yeomans D. C. Selective reduction of second pain sensations by systemic morphine in humans. Pain. 1986 Jan;24(1):93–116. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90030-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dong W. K., Chudler E. H., Martin R. F. Physiological properties of intradental mechanoreceptors. Brain Res. 1985 May 20;334(2):389–395. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90239-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edwall L., Olgart L. A new technique for recording of intradental sensory nerve activity in man. Pain. 1977 Apr;3(2):121–125. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(77)90075-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gerschman J. A., Giebartowski J. Effect of electronic dental anesthesia on pain threshold and pain tolerance levels of human teeth subjected to stimulation with an electric pulp tester. Anesth Prog. 1991 Mar-Apr;38(2):45–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HARRIS S. C., BRANDEL N. E. The tooth pulp as an algesimetry site. J Dent Res. 1950 Feb;29(1):68–72. doi: 10.1177/00220345500290011301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones S. F., McQuay H. J., Moore R. A., Hand C. W. Morphine and ibuprofen compared using the cold pressor test. Pain. 1988 Aug;34(2):117–122. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90156-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lado E. A., Richmond A. F., Marks R. G. Reliability and validity of a digital pulp tester as a test standard for measuring sensory perception. J Endod. 1988 Jul;14(7):352–356. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80197-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MUMFORD J. M. PAIN THRESHOLD OF NORMAL HUMAN ANTERIOR TEETH. Arch Oral Biol. 1963 Jul;8:493–501. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(63)90066-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Matthes H. W., Maldonado R., Simonin F., Valverde O., Slowe S., Kitchen I., Befort K., Dierich A., Le Meur M., Dollé P. Loss of morphine-induced analgesia, reward effect and withdrawal symptoms in mice lacking the mu-opioid-receptor gene. Nature. 1996 Oct 31;383(6603):819–823. doi: 10.1038/383819a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moore U. J., Marsh V. R., Ashton C. H., Seymour R. A. Effects of peripherally and centrally acting analgesics on somato-sensory evoked potentials. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995 Aug;40(2):111–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1995.tb05766.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mumford J. M. Pain perception threshold on stimulating human teeth and the histological condition of the pulp. Br Dent J. 1967 Nov 7;123(9):427–433. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Piletta P., Porchet H. C., Dayer P. Central analgesic effect of acetaminophen but not of aspirin. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1991 Apr;49(4):350–354. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1991.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sandrini G., Ruiz L., Capararo M., Garofoli F., Beretta A., Nappi G. Central analgesic activity of ibuprofen. A neurophysiological study in humans. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1992;12(4):197–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Taddese A., Nah S. Y., McCleskey E. W. Selective opioid inhibition of small nociceptive neurons. Science. 1995 Nov 24;270(5240):1366–1369. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5240.1366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vreeland D. L., Reader A., Beck M., Meyers W., Weaver J. An evaluation of volumes and concentrations of lidocaine in human inferior alveolar nerve block. J Endod. 1989 Jan;15(1):6–12. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80091-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Anesthesia Progress are provided here courtesy of American Dental Society of Anesthesiology

RESOURCES